- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
More Doubt About Allleged J6 Pipebomber
Posted on 9/1/26 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 6:47 pm
Steve Baker dropped another bombshell. He says:
-that a whistleblower said the FBI knew of a cellphone that pinged very close to both the RNC and the DNC "bomb" locations on J5.
-the FBI concluded that the person who placed the two devices HAD to be a law enforcement officer
-the forensic gait analysis led to a Capitol Hill police officer
I'm not 100% on Kyle Seraphin, but it's worth listening to his 10 minute interview of Steve Baker:
-that a whistleblower said the FBI knew of a cellphone that pinged very close to both the RNC and the DNC "bomb" locations on J5.
-the FBI concluded that the person who placed the two devices HAD to be a law enforcement officer
-the forensic gait analysis led to a Capitol Hill police officer
I'm not 100% on Kyle Seraphin, but it's worth listening to his 10 minute interview of Steve Baker:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/1/26 at 6:48 pm to IvoryBillMatt
A lot of fuss and coverup over fake bombs during a fake insurrection.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 6:51 pm to IvoryBillMatt
PART 1 of text of Baker's X post:
??BREAKING Exclusive: ?? FBI and Congressman knew J6 pipe bomber was law enforcement before the arrest of Brian Cole Jr.??
“We knew then it was a law enforcement person.”
Established and trusted sources have confirmed to me that the former @FBI Assistant Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs briefed a Congressman, staff, former high-ranking @CapitolPolice commanders, and a well-known journalist that a FirstNet whistleblower informed the FBI that it was a single law enforcement phone number that pinged within three meters of both pipe bomb drop locations on January 5, 2021.
Three weeks after that October 16, 2025 briefing, Congressman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA, @RepLoudermilk) sent me a string of personal text messages confirming that he and his staff had received corroborating evidence that the placing of those explosive devices “points to USCP [U.S. Capitol Police] involvement.”
The October 16, 2025 FBI briefing
On December 2, 2025, only two days before the arrest of Brian Cole Jr. as the alleged J6 pipe bomber, a formerly high-ranking Capitol Police whistleblower reached out to inform me that he had been part of a briefing at Rep. Loudermilk’s office on October 16, 2025. The FBI’s congressional liaison, Marshall Yates, briefed a small group of only five others that the FBI had received information from a First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) whistleblower about a single, redacted FirstNet phone number that had “pinged” within three meters of where pipe bombs were discovered on January 6, 2021, at both the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C.
According to Yates, the FirstNet whistleblower told the FBI that data long reported as “corrupted” was actually retrievable. The FBI sent a warrant to AT&T and Verizon for that data. Both mobile network carriers sent the recovered data to FirstNet for redactions.
According to the Capitol Police whistleblower who attended this briefing, Yates explained that because it was now known by the FBI to be a FirstNet redacted phone number that pinged within three meters of both bomb placement locations on the evening of January 5, he said, “We knew then it was a law enforcement person.”
Who was at the briefing
*Marshall Yates, (@MarshallYates_) FBI Assistant Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs
*Congressman Barry Loudermilk, (@RepLoudermilk) Chairman of the Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021
*Rob Adkerson, (@RobAdkerson1791) Rep. Loudermilk’s then Chief of Staff
*Steven Sund, (@ChiefSund) former Chief of the U.S. Capitol Police
*A now-retired former Deputy Chief of the U.S. Capitol Police who became a whistleblower in November of 2021 when he filed his first protected disclosure related to the events of January 6, 2021, with members of Congress
*John Solomon (@jsolomonReports), investigative journalist, founder and CEO of @JustTheNews. Now serves as the chairman of the new Government Transparency Task Force in the White House.
Why they were there
The Capitol Police whistleblower told me that he and former Chief Sund had received calls from Rob Adkerson asking them to come in for the meeting. The whistleblower and Sund have a long personal relationship and arranged to meet early for coffee before going to Loudermilk’s office. The whistleblower told me he didn’t understand his purpose for being there, as he had no background or working familiarity with FirstNet or the cellular network providers.
*During the development of this story, the whistleblower informed me that he had consulted with Chief Sund several times to ensure their memories of Yates’s briefing were accurate and in sync.*
Loudermilk and Adkerson were obvious choices for the briefing, as Loudermilk had chaired both subcommittees investigating January 6 since the GOP won back control of Congress in 2023. Adkerson, the de facto leader of the committees’ investigative efforts, had always been the point man for my many interactions with the Congressman and his staff.
According to the whistleblower, John Solomon was the “odd bird” in the mix; even stranger, he said, “Although Yates was giving the briefing, it felt like Solomon called the meeting.”
The whistleblower’s most significant observation was in the form of a question, “Why, after all this time, has Solomon never done a story about it?”
I have reached out to everyone for comments about that briefing, except for Solomon. Adkerson confirmed the subject matter with me several weeks ago, during his primary campaign run for his former boss’s congressional seat. Loudermilk announced early this year that he would not seek reelection in November, prompting Adkerson to resign as Loudermilk’s chief of staff and mount an unsuccessful effort to earn his boss’s seat in Congress.
Loudermilk’s announcement to step down from his seat on February 4 of this year came only three weeks after his new subcommittee’s only hearing on January 14, during which Chairman Loudermilk dropped the most underreported statement by any Congress member this year. Loudermilk revealed, “Additionally, the FBI operational updates note two eyewitnesses who described the gray hoodie suspect as a White male. Did this influence the FBI’s investigation?”
Three weeks later, Loudermilk announced he was leaving Congress for “personal reasons,” to spend more dedicated time with his family as a husband, father, and grandfather.
What else does Loudermilk know
I reached out directly to Loudermilk and his new chief of staff for comment on this story, and while I’ve not heard back from either, I already have an extensive, Capitol Hill-quaking statement from the Congressman. Only 20 days after that October 16, 2025 briefing about the FirstNet phone number pinging at both bomb-drop locations, Loudermilk sent me a string of text messages. At that time, the Congressman was already aware of our coming story in which we would name a former Capitol Police officer as a potential forensic match to the gray hooded bomber. With no prompting, on November 5 of last year, I received the following messages from Loudermilk:
“You are about to shake the world!!”
“I've been talking with Rob and Brandon … [his former and current chiefs of staff] ... Having my team dig deeper to find corroborating evidence. We had recently uncovered some evidence that was leading us in the same direction. We need to talk face to face. I have info that can fill in the gaps.”
“Will need to meet to discuss. It is circumstantial, but it points to USCP involvement.”
“If you have this right, I don't believe the individual acted alone. I want to connect the dots and to everyone.”
Exactly one month after Loudermilk sent me those text messages, the FBI arrested Brian Cole Jr., an autistic black man who would in no way qualify for a FirstNet phone number.
??BREAKING Exclusive: ?? FBI and Congressman knew J6 pipe bomber was law enforcement before the arrest of Brian Cole Jr.??
“We knew then it was a law enforcement person.”
Established and trusted sources have confirmed to me that the former @FBI Assistant Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs briefed a Congressman, staff, former high-ranking @CapitolPolice commanders, and a well-known journalist that a FirstNet whistleblower informed the FBI that it was a single law enforcement phone number that pinged within three meters of both pipe bomb drop locations on January 5, 2021.
Three weeks after that October 16, 2025 briefing, Congressman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA, @RepLoudermilk) sent me a string of personal text messages confirming that he and his staff had received corroborating evidence that the placing of those explosive devices “points to USCP [U.S. Capitol Police] involvement.”
The October 16, 2025 FBI briefing
On December 2, 2025, only two days before the arrest of Brian Cole Jr. as the alleged J6 pipe bomber, a formerly high-ranking Capitol Police whistleblower reached out to inform me that he had been part of a briefing at Rep. Loudermilk’s office on October 16, 2025. The FBI’s congressional liaison, Marshall Yates, briefed a small group of only five others that the FBI had received information from a First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) whistleblower about a single, redacted FirstNet phone number that had “pinged” within three meters of where pipe bombs were discovered on January 6, 2021, at both the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C.
According to Yates, the FirstNet whistleblower told the FBI that data long reported as “corrupted” was actually retrievable. The FBI sent a warrant to AT&T and Verizon for that data. Both mobile network carriers sent the recovered data to FirstNet for redactions.
According to the Capitol Police whistleblower who attended this briefing, Yates explained that because it was now known by the FBI to be a FirstNet redacted phone number that pinged within three meters of both bomb placement locations on the evening of January 5, he said, “We knew then it was a law enforcement person.”
Who was at the briefing
*Marshall Yates, (@MarshallYates_) FBI Assistant Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs
*Congressman Barry Loudermilk, (@RepLoudermilk) Chairman of the Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021
*Rob Adkerson, (@RobAdkerson1791) Rep. Loudermilk’s then Chief of Staff
*Steven Sund, (@ChiefSund) former Chief of the U.S. Capitol Police
*A now-retired former Deputy Chief of the U.S. Capitol Police who became a whistleblower in November of 2021 when he filed his first protected disclosure related to the events of January 6, 2021, with members of Congress
*John Solomon (@jsolomonReports), investigative journalist, founder and CEO of @JustTheNews. Now serves as the chairman of the new Government Transparency Task Force in the White House.
Why they were there
The Capitol Police whistleblower told me that he and former Chief Sund had received calls from Rob Adkerson asking them to come in for the meeting. The whistleblower and Sund have a long personal relationship and arranged to meet early for coffee before going to Loudermilk’s office. The whistleblower told me he didn’t understand his purpose for being there, as he had no background or working familiarity with FirstNet or the cellular network providers.
*During the development of this story, the whistleblower informed me that he had consulted with Chief Sund several times to ensure their memories of Yates’s briefing were accurate and in sync.*
Loudermilk and Adkerson were obvious choices for the briefing, as Loudermilk had chaired both subcommittees investigating January 6 since the GOP won back control of Congress in 2023. Adkerson, the de facto leader of the committees’ investigative efforts, had always been the point man for my many interactions with the Congressman and his staff.
According to the whistleblower, John Solomon was the “odd bird” in the mix; even stranger, he said, “Although Yates was giving the briefing, it felt like Solomon called the meeting.”
The whistleblower’s most significant observation was in the form of a question, “Why, after all this time, has Solomon never done a story about it?”
I have reached out to everyone for comments about that briefing, except for Solomon. Adkerson confirmed the subject matter with me several weeks ago, during his primary campaign run for his former boss’s congressional seat. Loudermilk announced early this year that he would not seek reelection in November, prompting Adkerson to resign as Loudermilk’s chief of staff and mount an unsuccessful effort to earn his boss’s seat in Congress.
Loudermilk’s announcement to step down from his seat on February 4 of this year came only three weeks after his new subcommittee’s only hearing on January 14, during which Chairman Loudermilk dropped the most underreported statement by any Congress member this year. Loudermilk revealed, “Additionally, the FBI operational updates note two eyewitnesses who described the gray hoodie suspect as a White male. Did this influence the FBI’s investigation?”
Three weeks later, Loudermilk announced he was leaving Congress for “personal reasons,” to spend more dedicated time with his family as a husband, father, and grandfather.
What else does Loudermilk know
I reached out directly to Loudermilk and his new chief of staff for comment on this story, and while I’ve not heard back from either, I already have an extensive, Capitol Hill-quaking statement from the Congressman. Only 20 days after that October 16, 2025 briefing about the FirstNet phone number pinging at both bomb-drop locations, Loudermilk sent me a string of text messages. At that time, the Congressman was already aware of our coming story in which we would name a former Capitol Police officer as a potential forensic match to the gray hooded bomber. With no prompting, on November 5 of last year, I received the following messages from Loudermilk:
“You are about to shake the world!!”
“I've been talking with Rob and Brandon … [his former and current chiefs of staff] ... Having my team dig deeper to find corroborating evidence. We had recently uncovered some evidence that was leading us in the same direction. We need to talk face to face. I have info that can fill in the gaps.”
“Will need to meet to discuss. It is circumstantial, but it points to USCP involvement.”
“If you have this right, I don't believe the individual acted alone. I want to connect the dots and to everyone.”
Exactly one month after Loudermilk sent me those text messages, the FBI arrested Brian Cole Jr., an autistic black man who would in no way qualify for a FirstNet phone number.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 6:52 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I didn't watch this, but Tucker put this out a couple of months ago.
People should be pounding Bongino on Twitter about this.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. People should be pounding Bongino on Twitter about this.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 6:53 pm to IvoryBillMatt
So the FBI got a CP officer to do it?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 6:55 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Part 2 of Baker's text:
Questions
Why hasn’t the FBI or Loudermilk’s committee informed the public about that redacted FirstNet phone number? Will the FBI now publish the data FirstNet recovered, to either confirm or denounce this story?
Only one week after the October 16 meeting, the FBI re-upped the $500,000 reward with new video footage of the gray hooded bomber, posting that video to all social media sites and again asking the public for leads to help identify the bomber. This suggests they still had no suspects at the time. Why would they again publicize the reward money and ask for the public’s help when they had new information that the bomber was carrying a first responders FirstNet phone?
Why hasn’t the FBI responded to Loudermilk’s revelation that the Bureau had two eyewitnesses stating the gray hooded figure was a “white male?” Also, while several pedestrians crossed paths with that figure on January 5, ironically, one of those people was none other than Marshall Yates. To my knowledge, Yates has never publicly acknowledged whether or not he is one of those two witnesses. (Is he?) Now that he has left his position at the FBI, will he acknowledge the contents of that briefing he gave to Loudermilk et al? Or is that information classified as “secret” or “sensitive,” and would he be in violation of his separation agreement with the FBI to even discuss that briefing?
What notes or recordings of that October briefing were made? Was John Solomon taking notes? Had the FBI already pre-briefed him before October 16? If the Capitol Police whistleblower, Chief Sund, and Rob Adkerson’s memories are correct, that information is the single most important story since the January 6 riot itself. Why would Solomon not have published that story sometime in the last 10 and 1/2 months?
Questions
Why hasn’t the FBI or Loudermilk’s committee informed the public about that redacted FirstNet phone number? Will the FBI now publish the data FirstNet recovered, to either confirm or denounce this story?
Only one week after the October 16 meeting, the FBI re-upped the $500,000 reward with new video footage of the gray hooded bomber, posting that video to all social media sites and again asking the public for leads to help identify the bomber. This suggests they still had no suspects at the time. Why would they again publicize the reward money and ask for the public’s help when they had new information that the bomber was carrying a first responders FirstNet phone?
Why hasn’t the FBI responded to Loudermilk’s revelation that the Bureau had two eyewitnesses stating the gray hooded figure was a “white male?” Also, while several pedestrians crossed paths with that figure on January 5, ironically, one of those people was none other than Marshall Yates. To my knowledge, Yates has never publicly acknowledged whether or not he is one of those two witnesses. (Is he?) Now that he has left his position at the FBI, will he acknowledge the contents of that briefing he gave to Loudermilk et al? Or is that information classified as “secret” or “sensitive,” and would he be in violation of his separation agreement with the FBI to even discuss that briefing?
What notes or recordings of that October briefing were made? Was John Solomon taking notes? Had the FBI already pre-briefed him before October 16? If the Capitol Police whistleblower, Chief Sund, and Rob Adkerson’s memories are correct, that information is the single most important story since the January 6 riot itself. Why would Solomon not have published that story sometime in the last 10 and 1/2 months?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 6:59 pm to IvoryBillMatt
This was gone over in depth, someone stupidly named someone just to get a suspect out there on radar, seems it may not have been that person and the MSM claims this is all a conspiracy theory gone bust when in fact, it's 100% a phony and staged event.
And still, no one will be brought to justice over it.
And still, no one will be brought to justice over it.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:04 pm to LSUbest
quote:
So the FBI got a CP officer to do it?
If I were forced to make a guess, I would say that the CP officer was told that it was part of a training exercise. The "bombs" were plan B to pin the "insurrection" on Trump in case the Deep State didn’t bait/coax/let the protesters into the Capitol.
Whoever planned the Fedsurrection is whoever had the CP officer plant the devices.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:23 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
lot of fuss and coverup over fake bombs during a fake insurrection.
Agreed. That's why Baker's work is important to expose who was behind the plot. Finding the real "bomber" would be a great start.
It's telling that MSM won't touch this story with a 10-foot pole (expected). What's disappointing is how MAGA has lost interest.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:29 pm to IvoryBillMatt
The older I get, the more I realize that nearly everything, and I mean everything, on the news is manufactured political theater designed to evoke a response or push an agenda. J6 was used to try and silence dissent at a time when society was literally being remade by scientists and social engineers in the COVID era. What the federal government got away with took a giant blow to our Constitution and civil liberties.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:48 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
This was gone over in depth
The FirstNet phone (available only to first responders) hasn't been discussed anywhere that I could find.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:53 pm to IvoryBillMatt
W meant the fake bombs left & the cops who just allowed civilians to casually walk by , oblivious to the so called danger of live devices because the cops knew they were plants.
The alleged former FBI who joined the DC force, the male suspect some claimed walked with a female gait…
The alleged former FBI who joined the DC force, the male suspect some claimed walked with a female gait…
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:02 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Im not saying they do or don’t have the right bomber, but Firstnet is available to people besides first responders/LEO/etc…
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:06 pm to IvoryBillMatt
An innocent black autistic kid sits in jail while Shauni has a nice new job with the CIA.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:21 pm to G2160
quote:
not saying they do or don’t have the right bomber, but Firstnet is available to people besides first responders/LEO/etc…
Thanks. Very helpful.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:20 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
People should be pounding Bongino on Twitter about this.
They were, and they should still. He deserves to be hounded on it.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:41 am to IvoryBillMatt
It was always evident that those 'bombs' were merely props for Pelosi to use in demanding immediate approval on the electors - did not want the planned challenges to take place.
Needed a "crisis"
Needed a "crisis"
Popular
Back to top
8








