More AI safety departures at top firms - OpenAI edition

quote:

---

A safety leader at OpenAI has quit the company, warning that its culture was broken and that AI firms were not “being nearly careful enough” about developing the technology.

David Robinson, who led the writing of safety reports that accompanied the ChatGPT developer’s product releases, explained his resignation in an essay headlined: “I quit OpenAI because its culture is broken.”

Robinson wrote that a cultural overhaul was needed at cutting-edge AI firms and incidents such as a “swarm” of OpenAI agents – AI programmes operating autonomously without human oversight – attacking the AI startup Hugging Face were “typical of the industry, given the speed and flexibility with which people operate”.

Writing in the Atlantic magazine, Robinson wrote: “I agree with other recently departed staff that the companies building this technology aren’t being nearly careful enough. But I believe that we need to look deeper than specific rules or new laws. We need to talk about culture.”

Referring to OpenAI’s pace of development, he wrote: “As the company sprints from one launch to the next, it is failing to achieve the level of care that I believe is needed.”

OpenAI has shown signs of caution in recent weeks, after the Hugging Face incident and the revelation that it has notified more than 100 organisations about rogue agent activity. This week it announced it was scrapping the release of a next-generation ?AI model after researchers raised safety concerns ?during internal testing. OpenAI has also paused training of its most advanced models.

Geoffrey Irving, who worked at OpenAI and was chief scientist at the UK government’s AI Safety Institute before joining the AI safety researchcompany Resolution, also issued a warning on AI on Saturday.

Writing in Time, he said: “Recent warnings about the potential destructive power of AI are understating the severity of the situation. I believe there’s about a 50% chance we all die because of the development of smarter-than-human AI systems, and that our actions over the next two to 10 years will determine the outcome.”

The warnings follow the resignation of Jacob Coxon, a researcher at the OpenAI rival Anthropic, who quit the Claude chatbot developer last month. He said he believed AI “could kill us all by the end of the decade” – and was backed up by an Anthropic employee warning there was a more than 10% chance AI would wipe out humanity within the next decade. Critics of such warnings have cautioned, however, that they are unscientific because they cannot be verified or falsified.

---