- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Moore wins, Senate expells him, then what?
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:05 pm to bamarep
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:05 pm to bamarep
quote:
That applies to sitting Senate members you moron.
Should I rephrase? They seat him and then expel him. Don't be a dick. I'm talking about the aftermath.
This post was edited on 11/15/17 at 10:07 pm
1
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:11 pm to Smalls
Thank you for proposing the recipe for the Senate to make their 12% approval rating even worse.
Try to unseat him, PLEEEEZE.
Due process still matters to more Americans than those cucked mfers want to admit.
Try to unseat him, PLEEEEZE.
Due process still matters to more Americans than those cucked mfers want to admit.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:16 pm to Smalls
If the Senate attempts that move they will create a huge problem for themselves... Alabama will not only push back but also strike with a closed fist....
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:25 pm to Smalls
quote:
quote:
The Constitution simply states that each house of Congress may "punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member."
Senate.gov
they'd need 18 Republican Senators to expel him and they have zero grounds to do so
pretty slippery slope and most Senators probably won;t wanna go down the road that says decades old and unproven accusation are now new grounds for expulsion
as for your question - governor appoints
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:27 pm to bamarep
quote:
You so fit the typical Aub.
on the poli baord?
plenty of liberals from every fan base & most AU people on this forum (and IRL) are hard core conservatives...
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:28 pm to Smalls
quote:
Moore wins, Senate expells him, then what?
Alabamians screw their sister/cousin and yell roll tide before Harvey Updyke poisons the trees in Mitch McConnell's front yard.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 11:01 pm to Smalls
fivethirtyeight.com did an analysis of the different scenarios of what could happen with this election:
LINK
basically, the Republican party is screwed bad optics no matter what happens. The best case scenario is a write-in candidate wins, but a write-in campaign makes the chances of a Jones victory a lot greater.
LINK
basically, the Republican party is screwed bad optics no matter what happens. The best case scenario is a write-in candidate wins, but a write-in campaign makes the chances of a Jones victory a lot greater.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 12:34 am to bamarep
quote:
Senate can't expel him dipshit.
Take Civics 101
Article 1 V
Posted on 11/16/17 at 12:35 am to dcbl
quote:
they'd need 18 Republican Senators to expel him and they have zero grounds to do so
19 by my count. 48 Dems plus 19 = 67.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 12:36 am to Mephistopheles
Good luck. Poor frick.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 12:37 am to bamarep
quote:
Thank you for proposing the recipe for the Senate to make their 12% approval rating even worse.
It'd be the one thing they could do that most right minded people will agree with.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 12:37 am to Mephistopheles
Ahhh, yes. Interfering with ANOTHER election.
How convenient.
How convenient.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 12:39 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Ahhh, yes. Interfering with ANOTHER election.
How convenient.
Well the Senate doesn't set any boundaries (does it?) So it has to get in on that sweet election fixing action somehow.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 12:43 am to Mephistopheles
quote:
Well the Senate doesn't set any boundaries (does it?) So it has to get in on that sweet election fixing action somehow.
Exactly.
So, expelling a duly elected member of Congress on mere accusations; would be interfering with an election, right?
You people are pathetic.
You found out that your smear campaign will not work; and now, you are trying to justify a Congress not accepting a member elected by a state, that has probably NEVER been done in our history.
Think about that.
You guys want to play this game; and I’m saying the people are not going to take it.
Try. It.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 12:56 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Congress not accepting a member elected by a state, that has probably NEVER been done in our history.
The Senate has done it before, but not since 1862. The last time proceedings to expel began occurred in 2011, but Ensign resigned.
I do find it troubling that accusations alone would cause the Senate to expel a member.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 1:00 am to Smalls
They won't expel him, they have no grounds to do so. This is how it will go down he will win this election and then these women will be forced to shite or get off of the pot which they will get off because they have no case. This is all a shite show for headlines. Roy Moore will be a Senator from Alabama and they are going to have to swallow it.
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 1:01 am
Posted on 11/16/17 at 1:02 am to Smalls
quote:
The Senate has done it before, but not since 1862. The last time proceedings to expel began occurred in 2011, but Ensign resigned.
It NEVER happened! He resigned. Thatndoesbt appear to be what Moore is doing.
Let’s stick to the facts and not conflate the two.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 1:12 am to stelly1025
quote:
They won't expel him, they have no grounds to do so. This is how it will go down he will win this election and then these women will be forced to shite or get off of the pot which they will get off because they have no case. This is all a shite show for headlines. Roy Moore will be a Senator from Alabama and they are going to have to swallow it.
Yep, they are going to fade away just like all the Trump rape victims, Bush groping victims, Mccain's sexual assault victims, and Romneys binder, they have gone back to the well a few too many times on this one.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 3:59 am to cave canem
quote:
Yep, they are going to fade away just like all the Trump rape victims
What the supposed one who was 13 years old and had the suit being bankrolled by a former producer of Jerry Springer or the women who claimed to have been groped with Allred's daughter representing them, yeah seems credible.
quote:
Bush groping victims,
Bush is a piece of shite ,but he is 93 years old.
quote:
Mccain's sexual assault victims
Again McCain is a piece of shite ,but I have no idea where you are getting alleged sexual assaults from, link this.
quote:
Romneys binder,
Okay.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 4:07 am to dcbl
quote:
they'd need 18 Republican Senators to expel him and they have zero grounds to do so
DEMs would not vote to expel him - they would cite "adherence to the Constitution" interpretation that suits them.
They would just 'tsk tsk' at the plight of the GOP having 'no better candidate than a child raping holy roller' and that would be the centerpiece of their campaign for 2018 and decades to come.
The GOP must take care of this themselves = BEFORE THE ELECTION
Whatever it takes - do what a DEMOCRAT would do (and have already done in NJ back in 1996) = Delay the election long enough to replace Moore's name with a more electable name.
Yep = I know the GOP griped to high heaven back in '96 when Toricelli's name was simply replaced with Lautenburg - DESPITE IT BEING AGAINST NJ LAW.
Goose meet gander
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News