- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mike Lindell TV Releases Irrefutable Election Theft Proo
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:30 pm to texashorn
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:30 pm to texashorn
quote:so when the people who committed the fraud certified biden, that means the election was legit?
I think those 81 million votes received the mandate they deserve when 50 states certified their results and Biden was sworn in Jan. 20
every day i am astonish at how many stupid people there are in this country
you must have missed the fact that multiple swing states had legislators that pronounced that their state's certification should be considered in dispute and that officials from multiple states signed on to the tex scotus case
0
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:31 pm to Crimson1st
quote:the colonists took up arms for less than what happened in the election
What else are “we” supposed to do?
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:38 pm to texridder
quote:oh my gosh here we go. who let the village idiot in here. you going to punk out like you always do when i hit you with facts?
why don't you post a link to a reputable source that says that multiple states stopped counting on Wednesday morning.
explain the georgia situation
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:46 pm to bfniii
quote:
good old ad hominem. none of this means his election analysis is false, right?
Anyone that takes the time to check actual county by county voter participation data for the claims made in the video will easily find that several are absolutely false.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:48 pm to EA6B
ok. lay it out. show your work
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:57 pm to EA6B
quote:
Anyone that takes the time to check actual county by county voter participation data for the claims made in the video will easily find that several are absolutely false.
I'd like to see that - Have you found any examples??
please don't tell us you are taking someone's 'word' for what you stated.
This should be easily debunked - a simple link would do wonders for your credibility if it contains any sort of data and analysis.
There is a mountain of data there - to dismiss it should require some amount of actual data facts. Not just knee jerk allegations of "conspiracy theory" like they did for the election.
Show us what you got.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:59 pm to SirJerTheBald
I'm sick of every time a liberal rag says something about Lindell, they keep hammering the words 'unfounded' claims etc. Three or four times in the article.
I happen to believe they are pretty well 'founded'.
I happen to believe they are pretty well 'founded'.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 9:04 pm to bfniii
He claimed in the state of Ohio for every single county the percentage of people that voted vs the total number registered to vote was identical. I guess he uses a different definition as to what “identical” means
LINK
There are plenty of others false claims I don’t understand why people take everything at face value and not do their own due diligence. This guy is not a data scientist, he threw this together on his kitchen table. I have been waiting since the election for someone from a legitimate firm like Ernst & Young that has a division specializing in forensic data analysis to do a analysis of the data, but apparently no one is willing to pay for it. Instead we get junk analysis done on a kitchen table by a physicist.
LINK
There are plenty of others false claims I don’t understand why people take everything at face value and not do their own due diligence. This guy is not a data scientist, he threw this together on his kitchen table. I have been waiting since the election for someone from a legitimate firm like Ernst & Young that has a division specializing in forensic data analysis to do a analysis of the data, but apparently no one is willing to pay for it. Instead we get junk analysis done on a kitchen table by a physicist.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 9:24 pm
Posted on 4/5/21 at 9:53 pm to EA6B
quote:not exactly. you seem to be overlooking his claim of phantom voters
He claimed in the state of Ohio for every single county the percentage of people that voted vs the total number registered to vote was identical
quote:let's hear them. you were kind of shaky on #1
There are plenty of others false claims
quote:this kind of chicanery took place in multiple states. proven dead people voting. the outreach center in georgia. p.o. boxes. people voting more than once. maidengate. you're acting like we didn't already hash out all of this over the last 3 months. people have looked into these claims and aren't taking things at face value as you claim. heck, this very video is citizen journalism not taking the state's claims at face value like you seem to be doing by citing s.o.s. data. and this kind of citizen journalism took place in all the swing states. many of the election cases were based on these investigations
I don’t understand why people take everything at face value and not do their own due diligence
Posted on 4/5/21 at 10:32 pm to EA6B
A lot of engineers are well-versed in statistics. In fact, anyone that 'moves' test data has to be somewhat proficient in stats.
IOW, you don't have to be a "data scientist" to be a data scientist.
IOW, you don't have to be a "data scientist" to be a data scientist.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 10:47 pm to AlwysATgr
I don’t even care - I don’t need anyone to tel me what I watched with my own eyes - Trump
Won and won big.
Won and won big.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 11:08 pm to bfniii
quote:
oh my gosh here we go. who let the village idiot in here. you going to punk out like you always do when i hit you with facts?
You have a serious psychological problem.
You spout this crap over and over and every time I call you out, you never make a response.
You are delusional.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 10:37 am to texridder
quote:I've asked you to prove me wrong every time and you run away from every thread.
You spout this crap
quote:LOL. Ask anybody else if they believe this.
every time I call you out
quote:absolute, objective, blatant lie. Quote any thread you like. No one on this board would describe me as someone who "doesn't respond."
you never make a response
quote:oh so you can prove Lindell and co. are wrong. Feel free to start any time champ. Let's see who's delusional.
You are delusional
So once again I am asking you to prove your point. Like with actual facts and statistics and data.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 11:30 am to bfniii
Tex has some serious issues and repeatedly gets word raped here... yet keeps returning. He must like it.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 11:45 am to Langland
quote:
The question I want answered is "Who or what government entity committed the cyber fruad?"
the op did not prove fraud.
it fails to account for the emotions of the electorate.
the op says there couldnt be such a turnout because it would be new data and the past is always predictive.
actually its not.
the whole thread hangs on false premise.
guess the ops people dont care for social sciences.
social science can explain the turnout.
people were disgusted by trump. suburbs voted against trump.
the left reviled trump.
anger and fear fuel turnout.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 11:48 am to CelticDog
only 65% of registered voters voted in Georgia.
the op premise of some unusually big turnout "beyond belief" is simply wrong. 65%.
and only 70% registered.
turnout was ordinary.
the op premise of some unusually big turnout "beyond belief" is simply wrong. 65%.
and only 70% registered.
turnout was ordinary.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 11:57 am to CelticDog
quote:
the op premise of some unusually big turnout "beyond belief" is simply wrong. 65%. and only 70% registered. turnout was ordinary.
You’re wasting your time here, none of these posters will ever take 10 minutes to actually look at the voter data themselves, and form a informed opinion as to whether the conclusions presented in the video is likely to be true or not.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 11:58 am to NashvilleTider
quote:
I watched with my own eyes - Trump
Won and won big.
watched?
watched what?
wtf are you claiming?
another poster used an expression about liberals in the boycott vs cancel culture thread.
ALL ENCOMPASSING HYSTERICAL OUTRAGE.
that is why trump lost.
feel free to share how you watched anything about voting in Pennsylvania or georgia that lets us know how your watching works.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 12:00 pm to CelticDog
Why?
Why the frick?
Do you type shite
like a fricking idiot?
Why the frick?
Do you type shite
like a fricking idiot?
Posted on 4/6/21 at 12:12 pm to CelticDog
quote:not factual or quantifiable in any way
it fails to account for the emotions of the electorate
quote:you can say that all you want but I have repeatedly asked for someone to produce the 80 mil biden votes for us to peruse. No one has. Trump's votes, otoh, were largely in person so we know that number is solid. So it seems you're operating from the shaky presupposition that the mail in votes actually exist and are legit, like your handlers told you to say.
social science can explain the turnout. people were disgusted by trump. suburbs voted against trump
Perhaps you could start with Maricopa co. Show us those votes
Page 6 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News