- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/6/21 at 12:15 pm to EA6B
quote:
You’re wasting your time here, none of these posters will ever take 10 minutes to actually look at the voter data themselves, and form a informed opinion as to whether the conclusions presented in the video is likely to be true or not.
the entire presentation is looking at the data.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 12:15 pm to EA6B
quote:so first, I addressed your silly post and you haven't responded. Second, you act like parroting s.o.s. numbers is supposed to be some sort of valid operational premise. The citizen journalism in the video casts doubt on the state's numbers that you are citing. You know why right? The answer to that question is crucial. It's currently separating patriots from traitors
You’re wasting your time here, none of these posters will ever take 10 minutes to actually look at the voter data themselves
Posted on 4/6/21 at 12:15 pm to xxTIMMYxx
maybe you guys should actually watch the fricking video.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 12:20 pm to CelticDog
quote:trump voters voting in person. Well documented vote switching. Videos of Biden votes resulting from fraud. Those claims
watched?
watched what?
wtf are you claiming?
quote:ok. Prove it. Show me the biden votes. Or are you just taking corrupt bureaucrats at their word like a good cardboard cutout.
ALL ENCOMPASSING HYSTERICAL OUTRAGE.
that is why trump lost
quote:eyewitness testimony. Like the ballot truckdriver whistleblower.
feel free to share how you watched anything about voting in Pennsylvania
quote:where to start. How about the Veritas video for starters.
or georgia
You want to talk mi or wi? How about nv or az? We can go all day
Posted on 4/6/21 at 12:24 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:FREAKING BOOM. EXACTLY WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY
did you completely ignore the part where they went to the houses and the person didn't live there
There it is. Americans, real Americans, as citizen journalists have been uncovering fraud for months now. But people like Celtic don't want to hear that. They want to act all smug like they have facts on their side when they don't and just parrot what their handlers told them to say
Posted on 4/6/21 at 12:31 pm to bfniii
Is there any reason why you believe someone who teaches at a children’s school in Cincinnati who was wrong on his covid predictions over elections administrators across the country, in all 50 states?
By the way, I am nearly 15 minutes into the video.
Ok, I had to stop. The “world-famous physicist” who teaches at a Cincinnati children’s school said computers are stupid, they only act on the information provided.
What if the world-renowned physicist’s information is faulty and misunderstood, as alleged over and over? The covid burnout prediction was wrong, so why put such certainty in this one ?
I did notice Lindell blamed Dominion again for vote-switching or phantom voting tabulations, or whatever. He is really doubling down. He’s either smarter than everyone else, or just bat-shite crazy.
By the way, I am nearly 15 minutes into the video.
Ok, I had to stop. The “world-famous physicist” who teaches at a Cincinnati children’s school said computers are stupid, they only act on the information provided.
What if the world-renowned physicist’s information is faulty and misunderstood, as alleged over and over? The covid burnout prediction was wrong, so why put such certainty in this one ?
I did notice Lindell blamed Dominion again for vote-switching or phantom voting tabulations, or whatever. He is really doubling down. He’s either smarter than everyone else, or just bat-shite crazy.
This post was edited on 4/6/21 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 4/6/21 at 1:54 pm to CelticDog
quote:
fails to account for the emotions of the electorate
So what metric would be used for this other than the votes which are the very thing that is called into question?
Posted on 4/6/21 at 1:58 pm to texashorn
quote:
What if the world-renowned physicist’s information is faulty and misunderstood, as alleged over and over? The covid burnout prediction was wrong, so why put such certainty in this one ?
So what was flawed about his methodology? In either/both cases.
(Not familiar with the Covid burnout prediction)
Posted on 4/6/21 at 3:18 pm to texashorn
quote:this is called the genetic fallacy. I'll let you discover why it's considered a fallacy.
Is there any reason why you believe someone who teaches at a children’s school in Cincinnati
quote:does that make his information about the election false? No. Of course not.
who was wrong on his covid predictions over elections administrators across the country, in all 50 states?
The reason why his information is believable is because there has been a preponderance of evidence of fraud and because at least some of his information was gathered and corroborated first hand.
I hope that answers your dumb question
quote:factually correct.
computers are stupid, they only act on the information provided
quote:i'm listening
What if the world-renowned physicist’s information is faulty and misunderstood
quote:or, he's seen the mountain of evidence that the rest of us have seen.
He’s either smarter than everyone else, or just bat-shite crazy
Posted on 4/6/21 at 3:49 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
did you completely ignore the part where they went to the houses and the person didn't live there?
People move and don’t update their voter registration, for several years if you went to the address on my voter registration card I didn’t live there, if we examined republican voters in the same manner the findings would probably be about the same.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 4:13 pm to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
Mike Lindell TV Releases Irrefutable Election Theft Proof
Posted on 4/6/21 at 4:21 pm to TBoy
You're two days late to this discussion. Just roll out of bed with 56lsu?
Posted on 4/6/21 at 4:21 pm to GhostOfFreedom
I’m sitting on G waiting on O to take our country back from the marxists
Posted on 4/6/21 at 5:41 pm to texridder
tex, where are you bitch. get in here and give us your awesome facts.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 5:42 pm to EA6B
quote:
People move and don’t update their voter registration
yeah, that's what it was, mistaken address. that explains what was going on in all of the swing states. is that it? that's all you've got? so i have to choose between your sophistry and the scientific data analysis gathered first hand? well, that's a tough one.
Posted on 4/6/21 at 5:43 pm to TBoy
quote:great. now the other village idiot is in here
TBoy
don't bother watching the video. you won't understand it. it's for adults
Posted on 4/6/21 at 6:06 pm to bfniii
quote:
Dr. Frank explains that the 2010 census was used to actually cast votes for voters that had either passed away or no longer lived in the county or state.
In numerous documented cases, voters showed up to vote at their precinct only to be told they had already voted, when in fact, they had not voted. What is now being revealed by the scientific investigation of Dr. Frank is that these Americans had their vote cast for them through a highly sophisticated computer program.
LINK
How does he know this (I believe he said this was all publicly available information, both the census AND the voter rolls) when...
The U.S. government will not release personally identifiable information about an individual to any other individual or agency until 72 years after it was collected for the decennial census.
quote:
The reason why his information is believable is because there has been a preponderance of evidence of fraud and because at least some of his information was gathered and corroborated first hand. I hope that answers your dumb question
That sure sounds like a “just because” answer. You have been confronted with questions in this thread and you pass them off with “just because.”
Why should anyone engage you when you get hostile after being questioned?
This post was edited on 4/6/21 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 4/6/21 at 6:11 pm to bfniii
If people want to criticize it, fine. Point out what was flawed about it.
Was his data stream suspect?
Were his ground rules and assumptions wrong?
Did he not fit his curve right? I think he said was a 6th order polynomial. Did he err?
Was his data stream suspect?
Were his ground rules and assumptions wrong?
Did he not fit his curve right? I think he said was a 6th order polynomial. Did he err?
Posted on 4/6/21 at 6:58 pm to bfniii
quote:
yeah, that's what it was, mistaken address. that explains what was going on in all of the swing states. is that it? that's all you've got? so i have to choose between your sophistry and the scientific data analysis gathered first hand? well, that's a tough one.
No, your choice is to take at face value a analysis done by someone with marginal credentials to perform such analysis, or spend a little time looking at the actually voter data, and from that determine if the analysis is credible. I’ve already done the work, but why should I bother to share it? If it doesn’t support the agenda it will just be called more evidence of fraud.
Page 7 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News