- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/10/21 at 2:57 pm to Jjdoc
Posted on 5/10/21 at 2:58 pm to jonnyanony
Yea that's where I was because in my realm when talking about the language I just hear SQL or T-SQL...never MS SQL
Posted on 5/10/21 at 2:58 pm to cwill
quote:
If you google "Microsoft SQL Dominion" you find that information provided to the TX SOS and the CO SOS list MS SQL as a standard component.
CO SOS
TX SOS
Also listed as a component in the US Election Assistance Commission's Certificate of Conformance: LINK
So what's going on?
Posted on 5/10/21 at 2:59 pm to Powerman
quote:But I can modify said data either remote or locally so if its not supposed to run on SQL server side then why is that?
Yeah it does matter. Because SQL isn't fricking "software" so much as it is a language for querying databases.
Posted on 5/10/21 at 2:59 pm to DaTruth7
quote:
SQL makes it super easy to manipulate data if you know what you are doing.
That's why you have to have DBAs that adhere to strict DB security standards....even after the network/server security is evaluated.
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:00 pm to shawnlsu
quote:
quote:
Microsoft SQL is illegal now
On those machines, yes, it is. What part of that don't you understand?
Can anyone link to something supporting the comment that MS SQL is illegal on these voting machines?
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:03 pm to cwill
If they do either you got bad docs or they did...what you linked looks pretty official....it checks all the boxes so to speak.
Although I'd hesitate to contract with the folks if they tell me I have to add a damn 2008 R2 SQL Server to my farm of 2016+ servers....My first thought would be "Hell no" and it would be hard to talk me down.
Although I'd hesitate to contract with the folks if they tell me I have to add a damn 2008 R2 SQL Server to my farm of 2016+ servers....My first thought would be "Hell no" and it would be hard to talk me down.
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:04 pm to DaTruth7
quote:
SQL makes it super easy to manipulate data if you know what you are doing.
It does
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:04 pm to cwill
quote:
If you google "Microsoft SQL Dominion" you find that information provided to the TX SOS and the CO SOS list MS SQL as a standard component.
CO SOS
TX SOS
Also listed as a component in the US Election Assistance Commission's Certificate of Conformance: LINK
So what's going on?
Maybe read what you link to? You ran a search and saw links and failed to read.
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:05 pm to GodnCountry
quote:
It does
This always fascinates me....I'm not sure how people get "write" access at all on DBs if they "don't know what they are doing".
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:05 pm to Powerman
LOL at you again. He failed to read what he linked.
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:05 pm to Jjdoc
So did they find any actual code? Look in the SQL logs? DB instances? Connection strings? authentication information?
Or was it just the software?
Or was it just the software?
This post was edited on 5/10/21 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:06 pm to cwill
My guess is the SQL was linked via an online network not just running SQL on the machines.
But wait these machines are servers? they run SQL but are not online hmmmm that is fishy for sure.
But wait these machines are servers? they run SQL but are not online hmmmm that is fishy for sure.
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:07 pm to GodnCountry
quote:
Maybe read what you link to? You ran a search and saw links and failed to read.
I'm not a programmer or an IT person, so please feel free to enlighten me as to what I'm missing in the links I provided.
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:08 pm to cwill
Yes. Look up the election commission certified program. It's not.
You linked to it yourself.
You linked to it yourself.
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:09 pm to ninthward
quote:
My guess is the SQL was linked via an online network not just running SQL on the machines.
But wait these machines are servers? they run SQL but are not online hmmmm that is fishy for sure.
Right so that was my question if it was a "connected" server then that is an issue because I think it was well published that they couldn't be on a network.
I think bringing up some arbitrary point that "MS SQL isn't allowed on them" is what got this thread talking because frankly it seems ridiculous.
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:10 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
It does not "provide access" at all. That part is not correct.
You are playing semantics.
With Management studio an authorized user can connect to a remote SQL Server and access a remote database. Network connectivity obviously needs to exist.
I didn't say it was the only way to do it. It may be the easiest and best way though. The existence of a separate program that connects to a remote server is pretty obvious proof of something nefarious going on.
SSMS won't have compiled code. The scripts don't have to be stored at all and never have to be resident on the hard drive.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News