re: 'Member how those new walls were a waste of money

For what?

Well, based on the stupidity of the analogy...

But sure, either one, as long as you stop.

That's the whole point of the wall - take up enough time to catch the frickers

Assholes who try to discredit the idea act like it will just be thrown up and nobody would be monitoring it.

quote:

---

For what?

---

This is the PT forum, the lady mentioned BiteMe, that should’ve been enough info to answer the question. It’s gonna take you awhile to get back in da groove....I’m pulling for ya. Lol!

quote:

---

Not really. Your opinion is that the outlay doesn't justify the benefit. Many people do not agree. 

---

Yes, really. The numbers show that the majority of illegal residents would not be affected by the wall at all. Those are numbers that you can look up all on your own.

And I don't care about agreement, especially with the shite I read here on a daily basis.

quote:

---

which is what? 

---

If you're reasonably educated on the topic and are willing to be honest, you already know the answer to that question. If you aren't, I'm not going to waste my time.

Also, "differential earning potential" is an idiotic retort to what I've posted.

Still as sharp as ever, aren't you?

quote:

---

Yeah walls don't work...

---

quote:

---

I didn't say that.

Go ahead and give that another shot, sport.

---

Ok so if I said it was a sunny mid-afternoon day in July in Alabama...anyone within reason would know I was intimating that it was hot. Did I say precisely "It is hot!"? No but come on, you could easily deduce that was what was being intimated.

So when you say walls are a waste of money, you are saying they don't work because if they did work, inversely, it would not be a waste of money.

Don't be obtuse!

quote:

---

Ok so if I said it was a sunny mid-afternoon day in July in Alabama...anyone within reason would know I was intimating that it was hot.

---

I'd say that's an idiotic assumption and completely subjective. I'd also probably just ask before I made an idiotic assumption.

quote:

---

So when you say walls are a waste of money, you are saying they don't work because if they did work, inversely, it would not be a waste of money. 

---

Nope. I'm saying a border wall is a waste of money. Your incorrect inference is your problem, not mine.

Ok so you said "Border walls are a waste of money!"

To which I said "So you're saying walls don't work?"

And you claim this is an idiotic assumption I made...this is why one should never argue with a liberal!

Not exactly, but sure, I guess that's close enough.

And I'm correct. It was an idiotic assumption.