- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Meet Rebecca Lavrenz, one of the J6 thugs who was so deservedly arrested by Dear Leader
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:35 am to thejuiceisloose
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:35 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
That's great to hear but if she broke the law....
Says the guy who’s very username
quote:
thejuiceisloose
celebrates a double murderer.
0
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:35 am to Revelator
quote:
Ok, so I read the statement of facts. So she walked around the Capitol lazily and might have raised her voice.
And this is grounds for an arrest?
Why did you leave the part out about entering an area she clearly knew she was not permitted to be in?
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:35 am to SlowFlowPro
Give it a rest, man. J6 was in very large part a govt stung.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I have the advantage of intellectual honesty and avoiding hypocrisy and let me tell you: it feels great.
You’re smelling your own farts.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:37 am to LegalEazyE
quote:
There were multiple of you figs on here celebrating her imprisonment or
Then link the comments. It's not difficult.
quote:
or implying it is justified
Did she break the law or not?
If she did, are you saying she's permitted to break the law, why?
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why did you leave the part out about entering an area she clearly knew she was not permitted to be in?
Because I don’t think it’s relevant when she didn’t remove the barrier herself and guards were filmed waving people in. It’s akin to people swarming the field after an LSU game. Technically, you know you shouldn’t do it, but you also don’t expect to be jailed if you do.
This post was edited on 4/4/24 at 11:43 am
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:37 am to the808bass
quote:
You’re smelling your own farts.
Did she break a law that is on the books?
Yes or no
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Praying was not all she did
Then what did she do you egotistical piece of shite???
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If you're a "law and order" type, you should be getting hard over this.
If you're an "equal protection under the law" type, it should make you want to vomit.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:38 am to LegalEazyE
Are you claiming it wouldn't be?
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did she break a law that is on the books? Yes or no
How many posts have you made about prosecutorial discretion?
Ballpark is fine.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:40 am to Flats
quote:
If you're an "equal protection under the law" type, it should make you want to vomit.
The problem with that is there isn't a comparable scenario to J6 since like maybe the 1800s?
That's why whataboutism is a very weak response.
Also that's literally what Leftists argue re racial discrimination in policing. Clearly they have lots of hypocrisy, too.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:40 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
and violate 18 U.S.C. 1752(a)(1)
Thank you for reconfirming what we all already knew: you are an idiot who is useful to the fascists in power.
.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The problem with that is there isn't a comparable scenario to J6 since like maybe the 1800s?
Huh?
This is why I know you're simply trolling.
Gtfooh
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:41 am to the808bass
quote:
How many posts have you made about prosecutorial discretion?
That's not a yes or no.
quote:
Did she break a law that is on the books? Yes or no
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The problem with that is there isn't a comparable scenario to J6 since like maybe the 1800s?
Nah, her charges could have been applied to hundreds of the Kavanaugh protestors.
quote:
That's why whataboutism is a very weak response.
I don't know who you that "whataboutism" is some sort of magic talisman that deflects all criticism of hypocrisy and double standards, but you're a dumbass for believing them.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:42 am to hogcard1964
quote:
Huh?
What other riot led to violent confrontations intended to disrupt Congress?
Not the Kavanaugh protests.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Also that's literally what Leftists argue re racial discrimination in policing. Clearly they have lots of hypocrisy, too.
When I see these posts from you I start singing Wilson Phillips.
“Hold on for one more day.
If you hold on for one more day, things will go your way.
Hold on for one more day.”
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:43 am to L.A.
the reason for the excessive prosecutions, charges and sentencing seems to be to buttress the impending prosecution against DJT, the more numbers they can rack up, the more they will claim legitimacy and linkage in the charges against Trump. These defendants are pawns to the doj.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What other riot led to violent confrontations intended to disrupt Congress?
I missed the violence in the Lavrenz complaint.
Page 4 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News