- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massive W for Trump.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 9:41 am to SallysHuman
Posted on 11/17/25 at 9:41 am to SallysHuman
Despite the merits of the “controversial” interview, President Trump’s comments on this issue will politically mollify this argument IMO and should put a floor under the falling poll numbers with the 30 and under demo.
0
Posted on 11/17/25 at 9:42 am to tide06
quote:
Please either provide an example of me "hating" on Jews or retract the statement.
Any standing up for Tucker Carlson's right to interview anyone he chooses is the holocaust.
Any reasonable observation that TC pushed back on antiJew stuff, again, holocaust.
Any question of why our politicians fly ANY FLAG that is not of this country- whether it be Israeli, Palestinian, Ukrainian... holocaust.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 9:48 am to cajunangelle
quote:That was my recollection as well, in part because that clearly is exactly what Tucker meant.
I would swear he said hate.
I don't get the asinine insinuation that the quote was "out of context" or otherwise misleading.
I suspect the poster found a transcript, word searched it for the word "hate," came up blank, and then assumed I was allied with the ADL or some such slop.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 9:49 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Tucker pushed back on "The Jews" stuff pretty hard, NF's views, while a bit extreme, aren't completely off the wall. I didn't nod at everything he said by any means- but based on this ONE interview, I'd say the "controversy" is at least 90% contrived.
You can call Nick Fuentes a lot of things and he certainly has his faults.
But what you cannot call him is a liar.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 9:56 am to SallysHuman
quote:He isn't in it.
Angelle... that NF clip you posted... where is Tucker in it?
Is he in it?
Now then, you have the TC-NF transcript. Quote Carlson's question to Fuentes about his Erika Kirk defamation.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 9:56 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
I suspect the poster found a transcript, word searched it for the word "hate," came up blank, and then assumed I was allied with the ADL or some such slop.
No.. I read the whole transcript.
I pulled up the section you spoke of and highlighted it for you.
Which is far more effort than you've put into this thread.
quote:
I don't get the asinine insinuation that the quote was "out of context" or otherwise misleading.
What is it Tucker "dislikes" more than anything? Neocons.
Why does he find their views on the issue so abhorrent? He thinks it is heretical.
This tactic "deplatformers" are using is the SAME tactic used against the Trump/Charlottesville mess. Very fine people on both sides- do you recall that? It is definitely a popular tactic to take people out of context and misquote them as a tool to discredit them. That is not a good thing to do and I will always push back on it.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:00 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Now then, you have the TC-NF transcript. Quote Carlson's question to Fuentes about his Erika Kirk defamation.
Don't recall reading it.
What’s your point?
Was this interview about every controversial thing NF ever uttered? If so, it was a rather short interview.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:00 am to SoFlaGuy
quote:
Well that’s not very fascist of him!
He really is the most un-fascist fascist ever.
I voted for a god-emperor and literally Hitler. So disappointed that bLuMpF isn't exactly who the Left told me he is.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:01 am to SallysHuman
quote:
What's that have to do with Tucker?
Also... are you **certain** that is *exactly* what even NF had to say? I've got the transcript ready... already ctrl+F it for ""stalin"...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. I don't think Tucker's response was very good here. Stalin intentionally killed at least 6 million people.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:07 am to RidiculousHype
Was an admirer.
Weird, yucky.
What was wrong with TC's response?
Context... they were speaking of threats n NF's life, the date of such coincided with Stalin's bday... TC wanted to know more about the threats of violence.
Where is Tucker wrong on that?
They never "got back to that"... I wish they would have because that was a very "wth?" statement NF made, but they didn't.
Your problem with Tucker on that is.... what?
Weird, yucky.
What was wrong with TC's response?
Context... they were speaking of threats n NF's life, the date of such coincided with Stalin's bday... TC wanted to know more about the threats of violence.
Where is Tucker wrong on that?
They never "got back to that"... I wish they would have because that was a very "wth?" statement NF made, but they didn't.
Your problem with Tucker on that is.... what?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:09 am to RidiculousHype
quote:
I don't think Tucker's response was very good here. Stalin intentionally killed at least 6 million people.
Hitler's name is also invoked in the interview... Thy also didn't go over how many people he killed.
Oh no... TC is a nazi! :ohnos:
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:09 am to SallysHuman
quote:
You're a reader of minds and hearts?
No, I'm a reader of actions.
quote:
I can only take him at his word.
LOL.
So when Biden repeatedly told the American public that the economy was going great guns, I suppose you took him at his word, too?
I suppose you also took the words of all of the politicians and media mouthpieces who told you Biden was mentally fit as a fiddle and totally capable of being POTUS?
We both know the answer is no. You looked at the evidence and concluded that those were lies. Just like I did. Just like we all do all the time, every day.
Truth is, you're simply not intelligent enough to have foreseen that you just made the dumbest claim possible by attempting to occupy the moral high ground implying that I wasn't being fair or that I don't have a basis for my conclusions.
And if you don't evaluate the evidence, compare it to actions and results, and conclude that a whole lot of people are lying at any given time in today's political landscape, you're even more of a moron than the above claim makes you.
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 10:10 am
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:13 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
So when Biden repeatedly told the American public that the economy was going great guns, I suppose you took him at his word, too?
The economy spoke for itself, nice false equivalence ya got there.
quote:
I suppose you also took the words of all of the politicians and media mouthpieces who told you Biden was mentally fit as a fiddle and totally capable of being POTUS?
Another false equivalence... I took Biden as proof of Biden's acuity- not second hand or third hand secret knowledge.
quote:
And if you don't evaluate the evidence, compare it to actions and results, and conclude that a whole lot of people are lying at any given time in today's political landscape, you're even more of a moron than the above claim makes you.
I'm sorry, do tell me what "actions and results" a political commentator is responsible for. I mean, seriously...
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:20 am to SallysHuman
quote:NO!
What is it Tucker "dislikes" more than anything? Neocons.
The word "neocon" appears nowhere in the clip. "Christian Zionists" is the term you're looking for.
quote:Irrelevant, both to point and poster. I'm not calling for "deplatforming" anyone. But as you brought it up, Fuentes was in Charlottesville. He was NOT one of the "fine" people Trump referenced. Fuentes is hot garbage.
This tactic "deplatformers" are using is the SAME tactic used against the Trump/Charlottesville mess. Very fine people on both sides- do you recall that?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:22 am to SallysHuman
quote:
What was wrong with TC's response?
To me, it's a statement that requires a halting of the current line of questioning. Wait a second, you admire a mass murderer?
Maybe it's just me
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:25 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The word "neocon" appears nowhere in the clip. "Christian Zionists" is the term you're looking for.
Your clip is truncated...
I have already posted this once... I will do so AGAIN... with additional RED UNDERLINE.
Hint... it says... NEOCONS!! Exactly exactly exactly after the truncated portion of your gotcha clip. Very Next Sentence.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:26 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
"Christian Zionists" is the term you're looking for.
wtf even is that?
It's heretical. And that was Tucker's EXACT point.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:27 am to SallysHuman
quote:
The economy spoke for itself...
So do Huckster's actions. Past and present.
quote:
I took Biden as proof of Biden's acuity
Yeah, except Biden also claimed to be fit and capable. Repeatedly.
Remember him challenging "Look, Fat, Look" to a pushup contest?
quote:
do tell me what "actions and results" a political commentator is responsible for.
His own. The ones he's being criticized for. Obviously.
Look, I'm not going to waste my time responding to the tactic of you pretending that you don't understand what we're talking about here. It's been explained to you multiple times by multiple people. If you are really so thick as to not get it—doubtful, but possible—re-read the post a page or two back mentioning Mike Tyson.
I'm not going to explain it over and over again while you pretend you don't understand.
I'm also out of the thread. I get it. Your cult membership obviously includes blind loyalty to both Trump and Huckster. And there's no point in arguing with a cult member.
It doesn't matter what they say, do, don't do, etc., and nothing anyone says makes a dent. The bad news for you is that Huckster continues to slide farther and farther down the bottom feeder slide to complete tabloid "journalism."
He's already practically the new Art Bell. And I'm far from the only one who says that.
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 10:28 am
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:28 am to RidiculousHype
quote:
To me, it's a statement that requires a halting of the current line of questioning. Wait a second, you admire a mass murderer?
I honestly would tend to agree... this particular instance though was smack dab in the midst of NF recalling an assassination attempt/death threat.
Not much could really top "Stalin is awesome", but retelling a life threatening situation probably gets a pass.
I WOULD like to know what the absolute frick NF meant by that- I can't think of ANYTHING that would make that acceptable.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:29 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
It doesn't matter what they say, do, don't do, etc., and nothing anyone says makes a dent. The bad news for you is that Huckster continues to slide farther and farther down the bottom feeder slide to complete tabloid "journalism." He's already practically the new Art Bell. And I'm far from the only one who says that.
It's funny how you say this about Candace too yet they both are the most watched conservative commentators in the world.
AND...
Both take the same stance on one thing.
Strongly.
Weird isn't it?
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News