- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:29 am to Bourre
quote:
What wasn’t Massie this engaged over the Epstein files while Biden was President?
because Biden never promised to release the information.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:35 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
If its a hoax wouldn't the admin be rushing to release the info to embarrass liberals?
The thing is, if anybody releases a name without absolute proof of wrongdoing, a huge lawsuit will be forthcoming. Just ask the North Carolina Lacrosse team. The prostitute didn't have anything to sue for, but our government sure has a lot of funds. Massie sure better be rock solid with the information he's clamoring for, because he will be named first in any lawsuit.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:38 am to Seldom Seen
Glad to see he has fully morphed into Liz Chaney! How many of the 214 signatures are Democrats looking to start a new impeachment campaign and the fool fell right into it gleefully
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:41 am to Lg
quote:
The thing is, if anybody releases a name without absolute proof of wrongdoing, a huge lawsuit will be forthcoming. Just ask the North Carolina Lacrosse team. The prostitute didn't have anything to sue for, but our government sure has a lot of funds. Massie sure better be rock solid with the information he's clamoring for, because he will be named first in any lawsuit.
They're talking about releasing police/investigation files, right?
How would that lead to lawsuits?
The Duke situation involved prosecution. As far as we know that didn't happen to any person implicated.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:42 am to BarnHater
quote:
Any list that gets published is just far-left nonsense that should be ignored.
First of all, why do people talk about a list? As if Epstein kept a Santa Clause list in his jacket pocket or something.
Also nothing should be ignored. If there is evidence then turn it over so we can have the scandals and move on. It has never been a big deal to me, but I agree there is some folks on both sides covering their asses and people are not going let it go.
The problem is that people have probably been destroying evidence while this drags on and much like the Clinton server scandal, nobody gets in trouble for destroying evidence.
So we are never going to get the kill shot we are looking for here. There are just too many layers of coverup involved.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:42 am to boogiewoogie1978
You lost me at “factual information” and that is the issue you geniuses can’t grasp or secretly hope is true
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:42 am to Seldom Seen
I’m truly baffled at the opposition to voting yes to release the Epstein files. Should be an easy yes.
The opposition seems to be making a big deal out of nothing.
The opposition seems to be making a big deal out of nothing.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:43 am to bigDgator
quote:
First of all, why do people talk about a list?
Pam Bondi.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:45 am to GumboPot
You are a fool just like he is if you think the “files” haven’t been heavily redacted and manipulated. Seriously, how naive are you?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:46 am to BarnHater
quote:
214 people who fell for a liberal hoax
You can keep saying this bullshite but it’s not changing our minds.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:48 am to BarnHater
quote:
First of all, us republicans don’t have an eco-chamber. That’s reserved for leftists who can’t hear any viewpoint but their own. The Epstein files have been tainted by Obama and Biden. Any list that gets published is just far-left nonsense that should be ignored.
Please explain to me Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner if it’s a fricking hoax.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:48 am to BestBanker
quote:
One accuser has recanted accusations about dershowitz.
Who is now dead after shooting herself three times in the face.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:49 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
because Biden never promised to release the information.
So Massie is only doing this because Trump said he would? That’s not a valid excuse to now support “victims” because it makes it more clear he is against Trump because his feelings are hurt.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:49 am to GumboPot
quote:
Pam Bondi.
Well she should have never said that, because Epstein didn't have a list, he just had people in his contacts like everyone else. Any list that is produced has been made by someone else.
Do people think Epstein made categories in his cell phone?
1) Ho's
2) Joes
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:51 am to OMLandshark
quote:
You can keep saying this bullshite but it’s not changing our minds.
So you wouldn't be surprised if the names of Democrats have been redacted but the names of Republicans and/or their donors haven't been? Remember, the democrats had this information at their fingertips for FOUR years and yet just now, want it released.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:55 am to Lg
He also thinks she hot herself in the face three times. He wants Trump’s name to be in it. He is a complete fool
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:57 am to JKeller34
quote:
So Massie is only doing this because Trump said he would? That’s not a valid excuse to now support “victims” because it makes it more clear he is against Trump because his feelings are hurt.
Maybe.
What’s Trump’s excuse for having lied about it?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:58 am to stout
quote:
like actually passing a budget
shite ain't going to happen and Massie is providing cover for Democrats by pushing this right now... We will end up with another CR full of bloat...
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:59 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
if it was "Trump now has 214 signatures" you'd be visiting Bangkok.
You really are dumb enough to think this made sense?
Why doesnt massie or mtg just release the names
Maybe Luna or Mace after their performance yesterday
Popular
Back to top



1







