Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Lynch woould have had to sign off on it

Posted on 5/19/18 at 10:47 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53472 posts
Posted on 5/19/18 at 10:47 pm
quote:

Judge Jeanine: I want you to remember that you heard it here first. Any “collector,” their name for an informant working on a national campaign, must have a sign off by the Attorney General. Here that would be liar Loretta Lynch. Lynch, herself, would of have to have approved an informant on that campaign. And if she didn’t then the FBI under James Comey was even more corrupt, going rogue in their attempt to destroy Donald Trump.



LINK
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78631 posts
Posted on 5/19/18 at 10:49 pm to
Not even a smidgen.
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 10:50 pm
Posted by lsuguy84
CO
Member since Feb 2009
19660 posts
Posted on 5/19/18 at 10:49 pm to
Most transparent
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11184 posts
Posted on 5/19/18 at 10:56 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/19/21 at 8:33 pm
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
7630 posts
Posted on 5/19/18 at 11:30 pm to
The saddest part of it all is that had this been 43 spying on Obama nearly all of us would still be saying take out the trash and let the heads roll.

It disgusts me that the left doesn't care when it's their side doing the wrong.
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
22170 posts
Posted on 5/19/18 at 11:50 pm to
War should be declared on the Democratic Party..
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44018 posts
Posted on 5/19/18 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

would of have to have approved

Posted by EastBankTiger
A little west of Hoover Dam
Member since Dec 2003
21323 posts
Posted on 5/20/18 at 12:01 am to
But but but...she and Bill "were just looking at baby pictures" in Phoenix...honest.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 5/20/18 at 12:09 am to
quote:

Put it in context of the IRS targeting of the tea party and other abuses and you have a clear pattern emerging of an administration who set the full power the federal government against their opposition.




NOT a SMIDGEN!
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 5/20/18 at 12:32 am to
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48923 posts
Posted on 5/20/18 at 4:49 am to
“sqeaky clean” Rex
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
12381 posts
Posted on 5/20/18 at 6:51 am to
Hmm. I guess this explains “marching and bleeding in the streets”.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:06 am to
Obama would have had to sign off on it.
Posted by Folsom
Folsom
Member since Mar 2006
3305 posts
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:06 am to
It disgusts me that the left doesn't care when it's their side doing the wrong.

Truth is an impediment to any morality of the left. There is an element of their make up that prevents them from seeing and choosing against evil. However, I would agree that some just have given themselves over to this evil.
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
14865 posts
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:11 am to
Don't ever let these frickers get in power again.
Posted by 88Wildcat
Topeka, Ks
Member since Jul 2017
13947 posts
Posted on 5/20/18 at 7:31 am to
quote:

Don't ever let these frickers get in power again.


Bingo, no one is even extending all of this out to the important part. If the Democrats are willing to do all of this in order to maintain and increase their level of power and control in Washington then what else are they willing to do? Just exactly where would they draw an ethical and moral line and refuse to cross it? Or is the correct question to ask would they ever draw that line to begin with?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram