- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Lulz, Dems to author Net Neutrality bill.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 3/4/19 at 10:05 pm
What will Libertarians and Republicans do now?
Because there is no way in hell the Dems are promoting anything under Trump, that it views as good for the voices on the right/conservatives.
It's the beginning of their attempts to control opposition voices. You can bet the farm on that!
Because there is no way in hell the Dems are promoting anything under Trump, that it views as good for the voices on the right/conservatives.
It's the beginning of their attempts to control opposition voices. You can bet the farm on that!
Posted on 3/4/19 at 10:14 pm to League Champs
Democrats are going give Trump 2020 they keep this up..

Posted on 3/4/19 at 10:27 pm to League Champs
They should get some Republican support by also forcing govt to ensure free speech as well as internet traffic.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 10:33 pm to League Champs
Is it to reclassify ISPs as common carriers and put it back under Title II? Because I think that’s a largely incoherent argument. All the things people that like NN rarely come up with the rationale for why Title II is necessary to accomplish their goals.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 10:53 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Is it to reclassify ISPs as common carriers and put it back under Title II? Because I think that’s a largely incoherent argument. All the things people that like NN rarely come up with the rationale for why Title II is necessary to accomplish their goals.
"Finally, telecommunications service is defined as ìthe offering of telecommunications for a fee directly to the public. . . regardless of the facilities used. ß153(46). The question here is whether cable-modem-service providers offe[r] . . . telecommunications for a fee directly to the public. If so, they are subject to Title II regulation as common carriers... After all is said and done, after all the regulatory cant has been translated, and the smoke of agency expertise blown away, it remains perfectly clear that someone who sells cable-modem service is offering telecommunica-tions." -- Scalia
This post was edited on 3/4/19 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:19 pm to League Champs
quote:Paranoia much? What does that even mean in real life?
It's the beginning of their attempts to control opposition voices.
Posted on 3/5/19 at 7:11 am to Mulat
quote:
It is their 4D Chess
Makes sense. Like 99% of the unique comments submitted to FCC were pro-NN. It's a winning issue and forcing republicans to vote it down is the strategy I guess.
Posted on 3/5/19 at 7:12 am to bmy
quote:
Makes sense. Like 99% of the unique comments submitted to FCC were pro-NN. It's a winning issue and forcing republicans to vote it down is the strategy I guess.
Posted on 3/5/19 at 7:16 am to bmy
Dmy, 99% of Americans couldn't tell you what NN means.
It's far from a winning issue.
The sheep from your side will just parrot whatever your overlords want without knowing a damn thing about it.
Drop your whataboutism below.
It's far from a winning issue.
The sheep from your side will just parrot whatever your overlords want without knowing a damn thing about it.
Drop your whataboutism below.
Posted on 3/5/19 at 7:21 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Is it to reclassify ISPs as common carriers and put it back under Title II? Because I think that’s a largely incoherent argument. All the things people that like NN rarely come up with the rationale for why Title II is necessary to accomplish their goals.
That only happened because Comcast argued in court that the FTC had no jurisdiction on commenting on their practices because they were a utility provider.
FCC then used existing law under title 2 that would apply to them as a utility and stop the activity the FTC was targeting (misleading advertising and targeted throttling of data).
A bill would not have to put them back under title 2. That was just the legal framework that was already in place that became usable after Comcast’s shitty lawyering.
This post was edited on 3/5/19 at 7:22 am
Posted on 3/5/19 at 7:33 am to roadGator
BMY is a racist idiot, ignore him and his Anti-fig brethren....
Posted on 3/5/19 at 8:00 am to League Champs
quote:
What will Libertarians and Republicans do now?
Oppose it, one would assume.
Next?
Posted on 3/5/19 at 8:08 am to roadGator
quote:
Dmy, 99% of Americans couldn't tell you what NN means.
You are right and I am one of those. I have no idea what that means and I don't even understand what the net neutrality argument is about
I sure as hell won't be voting based on it.
Posted on 3/5/19 at 8:11 am to FredBear
Me either really but I’m pretty sure our internet should have been horrible by now from the hissy fitting going on at the time. And mine still works like a charm and my rates are fine, etc.
Posted on 3/5/19 at 8:13 am to League Champs
What was the official death count from the last NN repeal
I want OMLandshark to show me his 10k a mnth bill
I want OMLandshark to show me his 10k a mnth bill
Posted on 3/5/19 at 8:21 am to League Champs
This isn’t about the public, this is about money in pockets and control of the internet. Look at the obvious sides here:
-Internet provider services (Cox, AT&T, Verizon, etc) are all controlled by Republican leadership
-Web-based services (Google, Netflix, Apple for ITunes, etc) are all controlled by Democrat leadership
It’s a clear and obvious power struggle that doesn’t appear to have significant effect on the public as long as the two parts of the services are warring. The issue becomes if both parts of the industry end up controlled by the same entity (vertical monopolizing, controlling all the steps of the process). Each side has to play nice with the other right now bc any semblance of control is minimal at best, and either side has enough money and resources to divorce the other. Google is trying to do Fiber so it can get rid of the provider services, and Cox etc can throttle the web services or remove them and start their own replacements
-Internet provider services (Cox, AT&T, Verizon, etc) are all controlled by Republican leadership
-Web-based services (Google, Netflix, Apple for ITunes, etc) are all controlled by Democrat leadership
It’s a clear and obvious power struggle that doesn’t appear to have significant effect on the public as long as the two parts of the services are warring. The issue becomes if both parts of the industry end up controlled by the same entity (vertical monopolizing, controlling all the steps of the process). Each side has to play nice with the other right now bc any semblance of control is minimal at best, and either side has enough money and resources to divorce the other. Google is trying to do Fiber so it can get rid of the provider services, and Cox etc can throttle the web services or remove them and start their own replacements
Posted on 3/5/19 at 8:50 am to roadGator
quote:
Dmy, 99% of Americans couldn't tell you what NN means.
Pretty much no way this is true. The pornhub anti-NN ads alone probably reached half of the country
Posted on 3/5/19 at 9:08 am to Mulat
Make it stop! Too many have already died
Back to top

9













