- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looks like Will Chamberlain may have been right about who the leaker is
Posted on 5/4/22 at 2:31 pm to YankeeBama
Posted on 5/4/22 at 2:31 pm to YankeeBama
quote:there would have to be a diligent effort made to remove traces of metadata.
a PDF that is not traceable
Posted on 5/4/22 at 2:33 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
She's taken down her LinkedIn.

Posted on 5/4/22 at 2:35 pm to FlexDawg
Is there even a law against leaking internal Supreme Court discussions or drafts of opinions?
Much good behavior on the part of government employees and elected officials was based on tradition and not codified law.
Might that be true in this case?
Much good behavior on the part of government employees and elected officials was based on tradition and not codified law.
Might that be true in this case?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 3:07 pm to HappySpud234
OK, fine. He just lied about what he thought he heard. . And it was Eric Ciamarella who leaked.
Both are nothing but the deep state pieces of crap.
Both are nothing but the deep state pieces of crap.
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 5/4/22 at 3:33 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
OK, fine. He just lied about what he thought he heard.
So first your talking point is to complain that someone without first hand knowledge was testifying about the phone call. When corrected, you complain that actually they did have first hand knowledge, but they lied. Seems like you don't actually want to know the truth, just want to complain I guess.
Just for giggles, can you tell me the exact lie that Vindman told about the phone call?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 3:38 pm to HappySpud234
Another DU escapee
Great
Great
Posted on 5/4/22 at 3:40 pm to roadGator
It means they’re scared of us. We are moving up.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 4:20 pm to roadGator
quote:
Another DU escapee
Great
What is it about someone asking for evidence that bothers you exactly? Enquiring minds want to know.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 4:33 pm to anc
quote:
She wrote her law school note on abortion.
She wrote op-eds about reproductive rights.
She spent a year working on abortion for the ACLU.
She clerked for a stridently pro-choice appellate judge.
So you are saying she is pro-murder when it comes to babies...
Posted on 5/4/22 at 4:34 pm to HappySpud234
I had no talking points. That’s bullshite you dolts on the Left use.
So much leftists corruption i confused the names.
Trump as President had the right to find corruption in his government. It’s his duty.
Biden bragged about his intimidation & quid pro quo.
So much leftists corruption i confused the names.
Trump as President had the right to find corruption in his government. It’s his duty.
Biden bragged about his intimidation & quid pro quo.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 4:34 pm to LSU-MNCBABY
quote:
I read this as wilt chamberlain and was like wait wtf
same here
Posted on 5/4/22 at 4:36 pm to anc
quote:
very possible that she did not intend to leak it to Politico, but she hared it with her husband, who leaked it to Politico.
my suspicion also, giving her the benefit of whatever doubt I can muster.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 5:12 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
So much leftists corruption i confused the names.
Trump as President had the right to find corruption in his government. It’s his duty.
Biden bragged about his intimidation & quid pro quo.
Damn, lol. It's the evil liberals fault that you mixed up some names? Very convenient.
Even republicans understood that the prosecutor that Biden got fired wasn't doing his job and was corrupt. Biden got rid of him. He did his job.
trump-biden-ukraine-2016-letter-portman-johnson
Trump didn't want to go after corruption. He just wanted dirt on his opponent and for Ukraine to announce an investigation so that he could use it to trash his opponent.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 5:28 pm to FlexDawg
Imagine living a life where your only goal is to make sure people can continue to kill babies at will.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 5:35 pm to HappySpud234
quote:
Damn, lol. It's the evil liberals fault that you mixed up some names? Very convenient.
Even republicans understood that the prosecutor that Biden got fired wasn't doing his job and was corrupt. Biden got rid of him. He did his job.
trump-biden-ukraine-2016-letter-portman-johnson
Trump didn't want to go after corruption. He just wanted dirt on his opponent and for Ukraine to announce an investigation so that he could use it to trash his opponent
Look guys I found an ostrich
Posted on 5/4/22 at 6:52 pm to HappySpud234
quote:
Damn, lol. It's the evil liberals fault that you mixed up some names? Very convenient.
Mueller probe, based on a Hillary/DNC paid for work of fiction, presented to AND ACCEPTED by the FBI/DOJ to the FISA courts, then used as the foundation for 4 illegal warrants...
Vindictive judge STILL harassing an innocent man in Lt.Gen. Flynn, for purely political purposes.
quote:
Even republicans understood that the prosecutor that Biden got fired wasn't doing his job and was corrupt. Biden got rid of him. He did his job.
Corrupt Republicans like Romney ? Yeah, there's a convincing piece to your swamp board game. Joe MEDDLED in the affairs of another country, via intimidation and threats , as acting VP and point man for US policy.
quote:
Trump didn't want to go after corruption. He just wanted dirt on his opponent and for Ukraine to announce an investigation so that he could use it to trash his opponent.
Hey, if that dirt is on the opponent who was acting point man under the previous admin and dirty as hell, so be it. You think Trump was just supposed to ignore the overt corruption by Biden? You think running for President is some sort of get out of jail free pass? Trump would be in dereliction of his duty to NOT look into the matter.
Trump didn't go far enough, imo. But we see the Deep State was clearly stacked against him. From the leaker Ciaramella, to Vindman to the boinking FBI agents who were hell bent on rigging the election so Trump couldn't beat Hillary.
It's mind bottling as to how partisan you are and choose to ignore all the facts. The DS had to INVENT reasons to go after Trump, only to fail, time and time again.
How did this huckster beat them at their game so easily?
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 6:58 pm
Posted on 5/4/22 at 7:12 pm to LSU-MNCBABY
quote:
wilt chamberlain
He wasn't involved with the leak but he did vote for Biden.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 7:30 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
metadata.
Paging texridder.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 8:26 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
there would have to be a diligent effort made to remove traces of metadata.
If you had a hard copy, couldn’t you just use Genius scan or some other app on a burner phone?
Popular
Back to top



2







