re: Looks like Nick Fuentes was a J6 fed.

Gumbo - you seem pretty informed on this stuff.

I’m admittedly not up to date on all the insider MAGA catfights and accusations. But this thread being 11 pages is noticeable.

So Fuentes has to explain that he’s not a Fed asset because he was an instigator and was not investigated?

Also we know that several people got guided tours of the capital from Barry Loudermilk in the days leading up to J6.
Do we know if all of these people were investigated?

Trying to figure out what the dividing line is…

His first appearance in the mainstream press was at Unite the Right.

He showed up again in support of KSU student Jaden McNeil’s tweet about George Floyd.

quote:

---

Congratulations to George Floyd on being drug free for an entire month!

---

He generates clicks by saying dumb, outrageous idiocy.

quote:

---

I want China to take back Taiwan, I want Russia to take back Ukraine, if for no other reason than it’s time for America to be humiliated.

---

quote:

---

having sex with women is gay ... What's gayer than being like, 'I need cuddles. I need kisses ... I need to spend time with a woman.

---

If you can’t see “troll” in all that, I’m not sure what to tell you.

If you’re not at least mildly curious if he’s a Fed, then you’re a very trusting person.

quote:

---

How did Fuentes first hit headlines?

---

Candace had a one-on-one interview with Nick a couple of weeks ago. The interview seemed to go fine. They were friendly and it was not contentious at all.

The next day Nick goes ape shite about the interview and draws a lot of internet attention. It 's takes Candace by surprise.

The following week Candace does a sit down interview with Tucker. In their discussion Candace speculates Nick was mad about the marriage questions. Tucker responded and went off on a little rant accusing him of being a fed like David Duke who's job was to cozy up close to right wing influencers so the media can make them guilty by association. Plus Tucker called him a little gay boy in the basement.

Come to find out in this thread, Nick was not mad at Candace for the marriage questions. Nick was mad because Candace was stealing Nick's Jew hating thunder by covering JFK, USS Liberty, etc. on her shows and getting high ratings. Encroaching on Nick's Jew hating thunder is a bridge too far apparently.

Then yesterday Milo chimes in and post all kinds NIck being a fed evidence and other posters showing how Nick is a pedo with Elon boosting all those post.

Then last night Nick again goes ape shite.

And here we are.

quote:

---

I like how you pretend you like watched the interview when you obviously didn’t. Candace got triggered multiple times.

---

I watched the entire interview. The only place where it got a little uncomfortable is when Nick said he was against biracial marriage. They just agreed to disagree.

quote:

---

Trying to figure out what the dividing line is…

---

The issue is, Nick talks all the conservative talking points that all conservatives agree with but he also throws in racism and Jew hate. So he makes it easy for the media to label him as a David Duke type commentator.

Then you end up agreeing with him on many points, the next thing the media is calling you David Duke. That's the op.

quote:

---

The issue is, Nick talks all the conservative talking points that all conservatives agree with but he also throws in racism and Jew hate. So he makes it easy for the media to label him as a David Duke type commentator.

Then you end up agreeing with him on many points, the next thing the media is calling you David Duke. That's the op.

---

His main message is that Jews have too much influence in American politics. I don't understand how anyone can objectively look at our relationship with Israel and disagree with that in good faith.

quote:

---

His main message is that Jews have too much influence in American politics.

---

Sure.

What’s his solution for this?

It starts with “e” and ends with “xecution.”

quote:

---

His main message is that Jews have too much influence in American politics. I don't understand how anyone can objectively look at our relationship with Israel and disagree with that in good faith.

---

He is 100% spot on in this regard. I think the biggest issue someone could have with Nick is he is 100% black pilled and believes it’ll take civil war or damn near close to it to repair the Republic.

quote:

---

Is it too simple to categorize it as media personas taking potshots at each other for notoriety?

Drama => followers => influence => political capital

---

Yes, I think it is in this case. Tucker's influence, followers, and political capital are all going to take a permanent hit from this feud in my opinion. To so demonstrably lie about his knowledge of his father's relationship with intelligence is permanently damaging to his style of messaging, and in my opinion tanks his credibility for good. Candace's too. I just don't see what they had to gain from this which is why I think they had ulterior motives.

quote:

---

Sure.

What’s his solution for this?

It starts with “e” and ends with “xecution.”

---

He wants to ban dual citizens from holding elected office (which would help with more than just Israeli influence) and force AIPAC to register as a foreign entity. He repeatedly tells his listeners to not commit violence against anyone.