- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looks like Nick Fuentes was a J6 fed.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:39 pm to Errerrerrwere
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:39 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:Either you didn't read the post that you were responding to, or your literacy is called to question.
So, your argument has come down to a weak non sequitur and anti Fuentes rhetoric.
What separates the behavior of Fuentes and Epps on January 6th?
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 1:40 pm
1
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:42 pm to Errerrerrwere
You seem pretty stupid.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
You seem pretty stupid.
From “why didn’t Nick Fuentes siege the capital” to “you seem pretty stupid!”
You are flailing here, man.
Bow out
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:49 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:No Einstein, the question is, if Fuentes was not working with the feds, why was he not prosecuted? Even Ray Epps was prosecuted.
From “why didn’t Nick Fuentes siege the capital” to “you seem pretty stupid!”
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:55 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
What separates the behavior of Fuentes and Epps on January 6th?
You are arguing semantics.
And I went over this with your slow, dense and dumb arse already in this here thread.
Epps was on the Capitol grounds- Fuentes was not.
People who were charged for their part in Jan 6 all had one of the following:
1) trespassing on Capitol grounds charge
2) destruction of property charge
3) some type of assault charge
Fuentes had none of those. Epps trespassed.
Now you can keep going on in this thread with your hair on fire like a fricking lunatic
OR
Bow out and admit you have no idea what the frick you are talking about.
Because you don’t. And only want to argue what your eyes saw on both heavily edited videos.
You are a simpleton. Someone who cannot gauge nuance. And someone who is spoon fed his information.
Or simply put…low IQ voter.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:56 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
No Einstein, the question is, if Fuentes was not working with the feds, why was he not prosecuted? Even Ray Epps was prosecuted.
Quoted simply for future reference for how stupid you are.
Everyone prosecuted for Jan 6 had one of 3 things.
Fuentes had none.
Again, quoted for everyone to laugh at your dumb fricking arse
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:57 pm to supatigah
quote:
like Ian Carroll for example, interesting content, makes some valid points, makes some completely wrong points as well. but deserves scrutiny because he quite literally appeared out of nowhere
Ian Carrol grew popular on TikTok because he put all the grocery store items in excel spreadsheets with each products information, like ingredients, manufacturer, health ratings, warnings, etc. He's moved on from the spreadsheets and has developed an app for that: Buy'r
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:57 pm to Errerrerrwere
I tried to communicate to you (in a way that you could understand) that you appear to have adopted the notoriety ethic as a means of evaluating people.
You can read Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind” for a fuller treatment of the topic.
“Here you are talking about him” could be as applicable to Jake Paul, Sam Smith or Dave Portnoy as Nick Fuentes (with the obvious difference being that Fuentes has a tiny portion of the notoriety of the others).
You don’t have a real argument here. If you’re looking for someone flailing, you might want to check a reflective surface.
You can read Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind” for a fuller treatment of the topic.
“Here you are talking about him” could be as applicable to Jake Paul, Sam Smith or Dave Portnoy as Nick Fuentes (with the obvious difference being that Fuentes has a tiny portion of the notoriety of the others).
You don’t have a real argument here. If you’re looking for someone flailing, you might want to check a reflective surface.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:01 pm to the808bass
quote:
You don’t have a real argument here.
Yet you want me to:
quote:
I tried to communicate to you (in a way that you could understand) that you appear to have adopted the notoriety ethic as a means of evaluating people. You can read Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind” for a fuller treatment of the topic.
No thanks. I dont need to philosophize over Haidt’s teachings to know when a full blown smear campaign is smacking me right in the face
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:03 pm to Errerrerrwere
The “smear campaign” is irrelevant to your way of evaluating Fuentes. You can reread your own posts if you’re having a hard time figuring it out.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:04 pm to the808bass
I think Fuentes fits the mold for America First just fine.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:04 pm to Errerrerrwere
I don't listen to Nick other than catching clips on X and YT, but has he ever expressed remorse for participating in the J6 provocation?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:06 pm to GumboPot
quote:
has he ever expressed remorse for participating in the J6 provocation?
Nick doesn’t seem to be the guy that bends the knee. But I like the kid simply because he is against our kids fighting in the deserts for Israel.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:08 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
I think Fuentes fits the mold for America First just fine.
Fuentes is “America First,” a troll, and a queer. You’re free to decide that’s your boy. No one else has to.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:09 pm to the808bass
quote:
Fuentes is “America First,” a troll, and a queer. You’re free to decide that’s your boy. No one else has to.
How is he a troll? He has been delivering the same message for a decade.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:11 pm to Barfunkle
How did Fuentes first hit headlines?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:12 pm to Errerrerrwere
Nick's problem is he is duplicitous. You can't come off as a personable guy in a one-on-one setting then go ape shite in the basement setting trying to crush the people you agree with 95% of the time. He loses people that support most of the messages you support.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:13 pm to the808bass
quote:
How did Fuentes first hit headlines?
I'm not sure. I started listening to him during his Iran/Israel coverage earlier this year, maybe you can enlighten me.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:14 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:See hotshot, I didn't know Ray Epps was on Capitol Hill grounds. I actually appreciate you pointing that out. Indeed it is a difference and a qualifier for Epps prosecution. It should not have been that hard to make the point civilly.
Epps was on the Capitol grounds
So your assessment is your goon boy is simply a David Duke style antisemite, who had nothing to do with inciting others to trespass, and is not working in conjunction with the feds? Fair enough. Good for you. Seriously.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:17 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:Then you're a fricking moron.
I think Fuentes fits the mold for America First just fine.
Page 11 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News