- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Live Hearing Utah v. Tyler Robinson-Day 5
Posted on 7/10/26 at 10:32 am
Posted on 7/10/26 at 10:32 am
The accidental publishing to media is addressed by Defense. Defense discussing a remedy if any.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 10:34 am
4
Posted on 7/10/26 at 10:42 am to cajunangelle
Watched some yesterday. All analysts agree that the defense is angling to make this as drawn out and painful in order to force the prosecution into a deal that takes execution off the table.
The prosecution would be stupid to do so.
The prosecution would be stupid to do so.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 10:52 am to Lsut81
No doubt defense objected to mostly everything.
Defense opened today about the 2 second document leak. Defense was dramatic saying he could buy the document framed for his wall... Tha State disclosed that everything in the document is in public testimony already.
I got called away briefly but last I saw defense is deciding a remedy.
Even SFP would agree that defense is most likely going to write up a plea deal...if this judge rules today that this case goes to a jury trial.
Defense opened today about the 2 second document leak. Defense was dramatic saying he could buy the document framed for his wall... Tha State disclosed that everything in the document is in public testimony already.
I got called away briefly but last I saw defense is deciding a remedy.
Even SFP would agree that defense is most likely going to write up a plea deal...if this judge rules today that this case goes to a jury trial.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 10:54 am
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:02 am to Lsut81
It is ridiculous. The judge made some docs with personal info forbidden fruit....that everyone already knows about.
It will be interesting to see what defense wants as a remedy.
It will be interesting to see what defense wants as a remedy.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:03 am to Lsut81
DP
Testing abc 123
Testing abc 123
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 11:04 am
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:15 am to Lsut81
I don’t think they are going to waiver however there is an exception.
The taxpayers are paying for his defense.
The county has already had to dip into their own rainy day fund. Now they have gone to the State for help paying.
I think the last number I saw was $3M in additional funding requests.
They could bleed the county dry in hopes of a plea with life in prison.
I’m hoping they don’t do that but I will understand if they do. It will be disappointing.
The taxpayers are paying for his defense.
The county has already had to dip into their own rainy day fund. Now they have gone to the State for help paying.
I think the last number I saw was $3M in additional funding requests.
They could bleed the county dry in hopes of a plea with life in prison.
I’m hoping they don’t do that but I will understand if they do. It will be disappointing.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:23 am to Lsut81
quote:
All analysts agree that the defense is angling to make this as drawn out and painful in order to force the prosecution into a deal that takes execution off the table.
Novak is ridiculously drawn out and repeats himself multiple times during every argument he makes.
ETA: I'm a bit behind but I'm shocked that the defense, as an alternative remedy, was to not let Robinson's defense be broadcast. Why would the defense not want their argument publicized?
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 11:25 am
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:25 am to MFn GIMP
Their official excuse is tainting the jury pool.
This was so high profile though everyone here that isn’t an idiot knows about it.
This was so high profile though everyone here that isn’t an idiot knows about it.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:27 am to roadGator
quote:
Their official excuse is tainting the jury pool.
That's why you have voir dire. Address it in jury selection.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:28 am to MFn GIMP
I understand.
I don’t know the real reason for the strategy.
I don’t know the real reason for the strategy.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:29 am to cajunangelle
His underbite is so punchable
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:31 am to MFn GIMP
Judge is reading before he rules on this. He is saying Ericka Kirks rights with the public media wanted access. Media as well, of course.
Judge ruling no electronic showing video of documents.
I think the Judge ruled this way to stop the defense from using it as a way out of death row.
Judge ruling no electronic showing video of documents.
I think the Judge ruled this way to stop the defense from using it as a way out of death row.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 11:33 am
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:34 am to roadGator
quote:
I don’t know the real reason for the strategy.
It's because the actual evidence is devastating for Robinson and they want to continue feeding Candace Owens conspiracy theories about it being da jooooos.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:37 am to MFn GIMP
State was saying the evidence is overwhelming and the defense calls up DNA people trying to do technical gotchas.It is a waste of time...Defense lawyers are paid to be dicks with a smile and waste time...
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:40 am to MFn GIMP
Defense wanted all cameras thrown out of court. Defense went on about Sept 1. Isn't today where this judge decides it warrants a trial?
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 11:41 am
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:46 am to cajunangelle
GIVE HIM A FAIR TRIAL, THEN SHOOT HIM!
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:32 pm to ItzMe1972
Judge is a fricking joke and a coward.... Saying he won't decide on probably cause until Sept.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:36 pm to Lsut81
So this is why defense said Sept 1 when they return for preliminary hearing?
any lawyers here? Is this normal to take a month in a half?
any lawyers here? Is this normal to take a month in a half?This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:41 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
s this normal to take a month in a half?
No... same as the hearing that is going on.
Prob cause hearing's 99% of the time are 30 min to an hour.
The judge is allowing the defense to do whatever the frick they want bc he is scared once Robinson is convicted and sentenced to death, he will be overturned.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:44 pm to FAT SEXY
As his punishment, I'd like to see his throat slit and have him bleed to death. Horrendous crimes call for an equal punishment.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News