Started By
Message

re: Live Hearing: FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok Accused Of Anti-Trump Bias

Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:31 am to
Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6670 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Nothing will be gained and we will be at the same place where we started.


This isn't true. The American people get to SEE with their own eyes the bias & smugness of Stroke. This is very important.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86175 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:32 am to
quote:

It's a miracle, I actually agree with the Dems on this. Release the transcript. Get it all out there.


LOL you thing the Dems want to get it "all" out there? They want to cherrypick questions that tip off future witnesses so they can coordinate their stories and avoid prosecution.
Posted by Big Chipper
Charlotte, NC
Member since Sep 2008
2966 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:34 am to
4 pinocchios!!!
Posted by PanhandleTigah
Florida Freedom Zone
Member since May 2008
9452 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:35 am to
quote:

you thing the Dems want to get it "all" out there? They want to cherrypick questions that tip off future witnesses so they can coordinate their stories and avoid prosecution.

Of course they don't! and someone mentioned the committees shouldn't cherrypick what should be released and what shouldn't. They said if this transcript is released, all other info should be released. I think that was Meadows.
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 11:36 am
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
25553 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:35 am to
Holy Crap. He just admitted that they changed "Grossly Negligent" because of the legal definition. No doubt that Lisa Paige was one that recommended the change. I find it disturbing that Comey probably truly felt that her actions were grossly negligent but the words were changed because it would have criminal ramifications. Does anyone think this language would have been changed if it wasn't HRC being investigated???
Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6670 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:36 am to
quote:

quote:Can we all agree having our texts exposed to the public would really really suck? Our text on work devices? Absolutely fricking not, IT'S A GOD DAMN WORK DEVICE. I ALSO DON'T WATCH PORN ON MY frickING WORK COMPUTER. Additionally, you work at the F.B.I. you have a clear understanding of what can be done with this conversations, let alone, ON A WORK DEVICE.


Not only that: "Say it, forget it. Write it, regret it"
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
25553 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:37 am to
quote:

This isn't true. The American people get to SEE with their own eyes the bias & smugness of Stroke. This is very important.


I haven't gained anything by seeing him in person. I've seen his texts and any person with half a brain would know how he'd respond to these questions.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65815 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:38 am to
They changed the criminal standard in the first draft, think about that...They let her off! Let her off, in a meeting.....
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19626 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:38 am to
quote:

The dems are fighting like hell to release the transcript to help others and Lisa Page.


Good point. Same thing Feinstein did when she released Simpson's testimony. Gotta give all the other witnesses a chance to get their stories in line.
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27860 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:38 am to
This dumbass just said Trump appointed Comey.

All the way back in 2013????
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167624 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:39 am to
Didn't Peter say in the end; that that change was not based on a statute? So it was admitted and denied?
Posted by lsuoilengr
Member since Aug 2008
5438 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:39 am to
this beeotch lofgren needs to shut up
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
38734 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:40 am to
Waa probably the most level headed person there
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86175 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:41 am to
Somebody please say:

Mr Strzok, are you aware of any FBI " pro-Trump " text messages? Are you aware of any "anti-Hillary " text messages? What does it tell us that we have dozens of derogatory texts directed at President Trump and his supporters accompanied by dozens of texts extolling the virtues of Costco booksigner Hillary Clinton? Is it customary to pack all FBI investigations with Democratic Party partisans?
Posted by WillieNelsonsDoobie
Bogata
Member since May 2014
1427 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:41 am to
GOP rockstar

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167624 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:42 am to
This guy saying that he is shocked that Peter won't own up to his extreme bias.

Then he goes on and reads the OIG report that said jarring evidence of political bias.
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 11:43 am
Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6670 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:43 am to
quote:

haven't gained anything by seeing him in person.


That's odd cause I gained the following so far:'
1. He is unapologetic for his bias texts, especially insults to Trump & his supporters.
2. He gets extremely animated (hot headed?) when defending himself all while displaying how much he hates Trump--the very subject of this investigation.
3. He also thinks he wasn't released from SC for bias texts but just b/c of the texts which "could be perceived negatively"...well no shite, that IS what BIAS is: perception!!!
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
25553 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:44 am to
quote:

They changed the criminal standard in the first draft, think about that...They let her off! Let her off, in a meeting.....


The problem is that they shouldn't even be considering what the criminal standard is when characterizing her behavior. They shouldn't be asking "do we really think she should face criminal charges over this?", which is basically what Strzok admitted what they did. Pathetic.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:45 am to
i was hoping he say in open testimony 'i think Trump is an idiot'


how bout his complete evisceration of Gowdy.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167624 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:45 am to
who cares what he looks like, fool. do you want me to waste time and post a pic of Sheila Jax Lee? how trifling. but it is where we as a country are at...
Jump to page
Page First 22 23 24 25 26 ... 69
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 24 of 69Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram