- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live Hearing: FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok Accused Of Anti-Trump Bias
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to cajunangelle
This lying mother fricker!!!
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to Contra
quote:
The fact this shite stain was high a the FBI should show just how much of a mess the fbi was/is. These fricks have made it to where it will be hard to trust the FBI for a long time.
You don't get that high up in a governmental agency without being a dirty opportunist.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to bwallcubfan
Not really. I’m not dumb enough to ever use a work email/ phone when I discuss political or inappropriate topics.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to wickowick
quote:
As a counter-terrorism agent dealing with Clinton, and Trump investigations, shouldn't he have expected this was a possibility.
Oh he's absolute moron, but I'm just speaking in general.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to wickowick
Guy is trying hard but he SMELLS of complete bias. No one buying this, it’s creepy!
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:02 am to cajunangelle
Anyone know if Strzok is a Russian name?
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:02 am to lsufan1971
I swear his face gets more punchable the longer this goes on. What a smug POS.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:03 am to skullhawk
"Mueller mentioned text messages but I don't think I was take off the investigation for the text messages"
"the text messages are not biased"
he said it with a straight face....
"the text messages are not biased"
he said it with a straight face....
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:03 am to CamdenTiger
well he said and texted all of these things, but contends that it's ok because he didn't REALLY mean any of it, just expressions.
I would like someone to ask him how anyone is supposed to tell when he really means what he says.
I would like someone to ask him how anyone is supposed to tell when he really means what he says.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:03 am to TigerFanatic99
Back after 30 mins--did I miss anything good?
Did the motion to subpoena Bannon pass?
Did the motion to subpoena Bannon pass?
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:03 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
Guy is trying hard but he SMELLS of complete bias.
he is bias along with many others in Obama's weaponized FBI, DOJ and IRS...
quote:
No one buying this
the Weak Minds are...
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:04 am to SUB
Peter lost his security clearance and was fired from muh russians. He was transferred to the Human Resources Department. He is a POS. Keep on spinning...
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 11:05 am
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:05 am to tigerpawl
Strzok trying to arbitrarily make his own rules.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:05 am to LSURulzSEC
So the entire point of this dog and pony show is to get Strzok to admit (or convince the public) that he was biased?
Then what?
I don't have the patience for this lawyerly nonsense.
Then what?
I don't have the patience for this lawyerly nonsense.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:05 am to LSURulzSEC
Yeah, the dumb people will love his sound bites put out by CNN and MSNBC, etc.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:06 am to IllegalPete
quote:
I hate to say it but the R's look like whiny little bitches asking about text messages and Strzok looks like the authority in the room.
I hope there is a bigger picture here because Strzok saying mean things in a text is not going to send anyone to prison.
The bigger picture is that they initiated the Russia investigation with extreme bias and likely under the direction of Obama. Unfortunately stuff at that level will be likely completely spoken conversations and never tied to it.
They were so deranged and so angry they tried to use their authority to investigate Trump on ridiculous pretense. The amount of "unmasking" alone should have sent someone to jail, and happened by Susan Rice for fricks sake. They wiretapped Trump for fricks sake based on what? They had an agenda, they thought something was there on Trump/Russia, and there wasn't.
The crime is not the mean text, the crime is what the mean texts led them to do, and if the mean texts can reveal that.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:06 am to When in Rome
quote:
Back after 30 mins--did I miss anything good?
Nope.
Nothing on record yet that change anything from the last 2 years.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:06 am to When in Rome
Peter saying he dindunuffins. Everybody has a political opinion. His bias never affected anything.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:07 am to tigerskin
Nadler up to jack off Peter.
Popular
Back to top


0










