Started By
Message

re: Live Hearing: FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok Accused Of Anti-Trump Bias

Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to
Posted by jawnybnsc
Greer, SC
Member since Dec 2016
6002 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to
This lying mother fricker!!!
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27860 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to
quote:

The fact this shite stain was high a the FBI should show just how much of a mess the fbi was/is. These fricks have made it to where it will be hard to trust the FBI for a long time.



You don't get that high up in a governmental agency without being a dirty opportunist.
Posted by 03GeeTee
Oklahomastan
Member since Oct 2010
3425 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to
Not really. I’m not dumb enough to ever use a work email/ phone when I discuss political or inappropriate topics.
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
39159 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to
quote:

As a counter-terrorism agent dealing with Clinton, and Trump investigations, shouldn't he have expected this was a possibility.


Oh he's absolute moron, but I'm just speaking in general.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65815 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:01 am to
Guy is trying hard but he SMELLS of complete bias. No one buying this, it’s creepy!
Posted by catnip
Member since Sep 2003
16378 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:02 am to
Anyone know if Strzok is a Russian name?
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
11063 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:02 am to
I swear his face gets more punchable the longer this goes on. What a smug POS.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
56554 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:03 am to
"Mueller mentioned text messages but I don't think I was take off the investigation for the text messages"

"the text messages are not biased"


he said it with a straight face....
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
35961 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:03 am to
well he said and texted all of these things, but contends that it's ok because he didn't REALLY mean any of it, just expressions.

I would like someone to ask him how anyone is supposed to tell when he really means what he says.
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
36231 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:03 am to
Back after 30 mins--did I miss anything good?

Did the motion to subpoena Bannon pass?
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
79466 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Guy is trying hard but he SMELLS of complete bias.


he is bias along with many others in Obama's weaponized FBI, DOJ and IRS...

quote:

No one buying this


the Weak Minds are...
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167605 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:04 am to
Peter lost his security clearance and was fired from muh russians. He was transferred to the Human Resources Department. He is a POS. Keep on spinning...
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 11:05 am
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22628 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:05 am to
Strzok trying to arbitrarily make his own rules.
Posted by IllegalPete
Front Range
Member since Oct 2017
7182 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:05 am to
So the entire point of this dog and pony show is to get Strzok to admit (or convince the public) that he was biased?

Then what?

I don't have the patience for this lawyerly nonsense.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46745 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:05 am to
Yeah, the dumb people will love his sound bites put out by CNN and MSNBC, etc.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29311 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

I hate to say it but the R's look like whiny little bitches asking about text messages and Strzok looks like the authority in the room.

I hope there is a bigger picture here because Strzok saying mean things in a text is not going to send anyone to prison.


The bigger picture is that they initiated the Russia investigation with extreme bias and likely under the direction of Obama. Unfortunately stuff at that level will be likely completely spoken conversations and never tied to it.

They were so deranged and so angry they tried to use their authority to investigate Trump on ridiculous pretense. The amount of "unmasking" alone should have sent someone to jail, and happened by Susan Rice for fricks sake. They wiretapped Trump for fricks sake based on what? They had an agenda, they thought something was there on Trump/Russia, and there wasn't.

The crime is not the mean text, the crime is what the mean texts led them to do, and if the mean texts can reveal that.
Posted by IllegalPete
Front Range
Member since Oct 2017
7182 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Back after 30 mins--did I miss anything good?


Nope.

Nothing on record yet that change anything from the last 2 years.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167605 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:06 am to
Peter saying he dindunuffins. Everybody has a political opinion. His bias never affected anything.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66115 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:07 am to
i been saying this
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167605 posts
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:07 am to
Nadler up to jack off Peter.
Jump to page
Page First 19 20 21 22 23 ... 69
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 21 of 69Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram