0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LIVE Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson Debate: Over whether Israel Killed Charlie Kirk
Posted on 8/16/26 at 5:14 pm to the808bass
Posted on 8/16/26 at 5:14 pm to the808bass
quote:
Let’s say you’re heterosexual. Just as a hypothetical
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 11:17 am
Posted on 8/16/26 at 5:37 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Found the low IQ JOOtard…
Good goy, Rabbi Epstein will venmo you 20 shekels for your service.
Posted on 8/16/26 at 7:38 pm to Defenseiskey
Where do you learn to talk like this? This makes reddit talk look intelligent. What is a goy?
Posted on 8/16/26 at 7:59 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
What is a goy?
Goy is what Jews call non Jews. They hate anyone who is a goy, look up the Talmud. Rabbi Epstein would call Christians this frequently in the files.
Posted on 8/16/26 at 8:56 pm to the808bass
Posted on 8/16/26 at 10:35 pm to riccoar
quote:
So did the Jews brainwash him into falsely confessing to his parents "I did it."?
No. The Jooz did.
And the French Foreign Legion, according to Candace.
Posted on 8/16/26 at 11:53 pm to wackatimesthree
I just watched the entire thing.
If anyone thinks Andrew Wilson won or did anything but stooge for TPUSA (he went to a debate training there ) , they’re being delusional. I’ve held the objective personal opinion that there were many weird happenings around the days after and the investigation and the images etc., but I don’t actively watch Candace. Andrew came off as condescending, desperate and unknowledgeable about the case. He went to nail a few talking points and try to get her to make bold claims. Just another horrible PR moves by TPUSA. Funny how when the talent is killed, the void can’t be filled by shells of the conservative movement like Shapiro, Wilson and Alex stein. Oh and Babylon Bee. Yikes.
If anyone thinks Andrew Wilson won or did anything but stooge for TPUSA (he went to a debate training there
) , they’re being delusional. I’ve held the objective personal opinion that there were many weird happenings around the days after and the investigation and the images etc., but I don’t actively watch Candace. Andrew came off as condescending, desperate and unknowledgeable about the case. He went to nail a few talking points and try to get her to make bold claims. Just another horrible PR moves by TPUSA. Funny how when the talent is killed, the void can’t be filled by shells of the conservative movement like Shapiro, Wilson and Alex stein. Oh and Babylon Bee. Yikes. Posted on 8/17/26 at 6:25 am to 1897
You don’t think he won because:
1) you don’t agree with his premise. You don’t think Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk.
2) you don’t understand what a debate is. You think winning a debate is making a zinger of a comment. It’s not. It’s making points that are based in evidence and reason. I don’t think Andrew did that as consistently as I would’ve like. But Candace made absolutely zero points that backed her position that were based in evidence.
1) you don’t agree with his premise. You don’t think Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk.
2) you don’t understand what a debate is. You think winning a debate is making a zinger of a comment. It’s not. It’s making points that are based in evidence and reason. I don’t think Andrew did that as consistently as I would’ve like. But Candace made absolutely zero points that backed her position that were based in evidence.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 6:30 am to MikkUGA
quote:
The fragments didnt have strike marks to match the barrel. That's because it was a jacketed soft point round and the fragments were either too small or too deformed. What they can say is that round could be fired from the exact 30.06 that Tyler Robinson left there with 1 empty shell casing still in the chamber from a .30 caliber bullet and 4 other .30 caliber jacketed soft point rounds. I guess thats just coincidence and you all have another 30.06 that it was fired from that you recovered.
Why do you keep providing partial evidence? The examiner gave an estimated diameter based on the observed fragments. The estimated diameter given was 0.286 to 0.301. That’s interesting because the 30-06 round diameter is 0.308. She stretched the diameter to 0.301 just to be able to say a 30 class rifle but still fell short of the actual 30-06 round. In addition, the medical examiner found 7 fragments but she was only provided with 4. No one seems to know where the other three went. Is that because the other three would disprove their claim?
I know you believe Robinson did it, but can you at least acknowledge there are many facts surrounding this case that seem strange?
Posted on 8/17/26 at 7:29 am to CDUBTX
quote:
I know you believe Robinson did it, but can you at least acknowledge there are many facts surrounding this case that seem strange?
The strangest fact is that there’s a dude who confessed to doing it and there’s millions of people who are pretending he didn’t because they’re addicted to thinking they have some special knowledge.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 7:30 am to the808bass
quote:Wilson’s entire debate strategy.
think winning a debate is making a zinger of a comment.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 7:38 am to 1897
No. It wasn’t. You seem mildly retarded. Good luck.
This post was edited on 8/17/26 at 7:38 am
Posted on 8/17/26 at 7:58 am to the808bass
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:22 am to Forzaazzurri88
quote:
Think it's a coincidence he gets 86ed and then lo and behold there's war with Iran ?
That seems like enough evidence for me. Hurr durr.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:25 am to Forzaazzurri88
Feel free to present actual evidence of someone else doing it.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:29 am to Forzaazzurri88
This is 100% false. And you claiming it as truth shows how fricking brain rotted you are.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:30 am to Forzaazzurri88
quote:Except that both he and his lawyer admit he did it.
There's no evidence it was the kid they accused
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:31 am to Forzaazzurri88
I can ad hom better than you, fig.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:44 am to tigerlion
quote:
Until the very end when Andrew knew 0/7 of the charges against Tyler Robinson. He was 75% certain Tyler is guilty but 0% certain of the charges.
This is semantics. From a macro standpoint, it’s murder, but there’s multiple ways to frame it and they always include lesser charges as a fallback for the jury.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:47 am to Forzaazzurri88
quote:What evidence would be required to prove someone's guilt? Give me an example of anyone's death that wasn't a conspiracy. That the story we were told is true. I want to know your baseline of what counts as credible evidence or confession verses planted evidence and a forced confession.
Oh they admit it well thats that then I forgot you can't be threatened into falsely admitting anything. You could admit to the Kennedy assassination it means nothing
Page 20 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News