- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active.. 0 heard evidence
Posted on 1/24/21 at 8:22 pm to bfniii
Posted on 1/24/21 at 8:22 pm to bfniii
quote:Don't need to Google, that's not what the OP said, so it's not relevant.
which case actually made it to trial. i'll wait while you google that
I'd hope you're smart enough to realize you need to present evidence in order to even get to a trial. You don't just magically get a trial because you want to.
This post was edited on 1/24/21 at 8:24 pm
2
Posted on 1/24/21 at 8:23 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Muh fraud has never been proven.
Found the moron who missed the point entirely.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 11:33 pm to BiteMe2020
quote:
You mean like the Wisconsin case that ruled that the "indefinitely confined" status was wrongly applied?
Absolutely false. Where did you read that? Because you couldn't have gotten that from reading the opinion.
The court ruled that the governor's 'Safe at Home' edict did not entitle voters to claim they were 'indefinitely confined' which would allow them to get an absentee ballot without presenting an ID.
The Plaintiff didn't present any evidence that individual voters who did not qualify for involuntary confined status wrongfully claimed that they did. Instead, they requested that ALL involuntary confined absentee ballots be thrown out.
No way a Court is going to exclude a whole class of voters. Individual ballots should have been challenged.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 8:32 pm to dswear
quote:was he wrong?
Trump has cried fraud or a rigged system every time he has lost *anything*.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 8:36 pm to shel311
quote:
Don't need to Google, that's not what the OP said, so it's not relevant.
I'd hope you're smart enough to realize you need to present evidence in order to even get to a trial. You don't just magically get a trial because you want to.
another never seen in biden threads
Posted on 2/3/21 at 8:36 pm to texridder
quote:
Absolutely false. Where did you read that? Because you couldn't have gotten that from reading the opinion.
The court ruled that the governor's 'Safe at Home' edict did not entitle voters to claim they were 'indefinitely confined' which would allow them to get an absentee ballot without presenting an ID.
The Plaintiff didn't present any evidence that individual voters who did not qualify for involuntary confined status wrongfully claimed that they did. Instead, they requested that ALL involuntary confined absentee ballots be thrown out.
No way a Court is going to exclude a whole class of voters. Individual ballots should have been challenged.
and another
Posted on 2/3/21 at 8:38 pm to texridder
quote:
The Plaintiff didn't present any evidence that individual voters who did not qualify for involuntary confined status wrongfully claimed that they did. Instead, they requested that ALL involuntary confined absentee ballots be thrown out.
Because they are all invalid. Flipping rules before the election does not make "anyone who sends in a ballot" legal.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 8:39 pm to shel311
quote:that's EXACTLY what the op said and that's why it's relevant.
that's not what the OP said, so it's not relevant
1. no evidence made it to trial
2. you said that's not true
3. it is factually true
in not a single case was evidence allowed to be presented in court for examination and cross examination. not one.
does that not bother you in the face of a tsunami of investigations? no one will trust elections again because the election officials have blatantly stymied investigation at every turn
quote:but what you're missing is that the evidence was not allowed to be considered in and of itself. judges only heard the evidence in relation to the merit of the case or the standing of the plaintiffs.
'd hope you're smart enough to realize you need to present evidence in order to even get to a trial
this is a clear misstep by the judiciary in regard to election irregularities cases.
Posted on 2/3/21 at 8:42 pm to texridder
quote:but that didn't have to happen and that's where the judges were wrong in their approach to these cases. all they had to do was ensure widespread, transparent, impartial, independent audit. that's it. that's all they needed to do.
No way a Court is going to exclude a whole class of voters
but they had it in their heads that any decision they made was going to "decide" the election which is a silly, elementary mistake
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News