Started By
Message

re: Liberals, give me ONE racist thing Trump has done.

Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:53 pm to
Posted by BuckeyesAndBulldogs
Athens, Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
3235 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:53 pm to
Trump isn’t racist. He’s just a senile, old man.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Are you saying the Central Park 5 were innocent little angels?
Funny you put it in the same terms Trump did when he doubled down on being wrong by being wrong again.
quote:
“these young men do not exactly have the pasts of angels.”
None had ever been arrested before
quote:
It is a virtual certainty they participated in the attack. 
And you can virtually frick anybody you want with a cell phone and some goggles
quote:
They also brutally attacked others that night.
Link?

Trump was wrong, and still won't admit to being wrong. You can die on that hill, too, I don't care.


excellent rebuttal.

Well done.

Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98930 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

My statement is my opinion. If that triggers you, so be it.


No trigger here. I fully support your right to express your incorrect opinion.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Not sure what ever happened with that case.
Case involved multiple horrendous gang attacks on individuals in CentralPark that evening. Trisha Meili was similarly attacked, beaten into a coma, raped and sodomized. The Central Park 5 were apprehended "wilding" in the park. Each confessed to assaults including that of Trisha Meili with details no one would have known without being there. Each separately described his buddies restraining the victim and/or assaulting her. A couple of them described a hooded PuertoRican raping her with them.

Ultimately the only DNA retained in evidence pointed to a pathologically insane man of PuertoRican descent, Matias Reyes, who was serving a life sentence for other rapes. Reyes confessed to the rape, and claimed he was alone. The claim of being alone was a virtually certain lie, but it was enough to spring the CP5.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108241 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:55 pm to
Pandering to Louisana voters pretending he didn't know anything about David Duke and saying there were some decent people in this image:



But that's really all I've got. He's been culturally insensitive, but those are the only times Trump has done something objectively racist.
Posted by culsutiger
Member since Apr 2012
652 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:55 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/3/18 at 11:47 pm
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

excellent rebuttal. Well done.



I agree.



However, I hate the concept of "he is WRONG about some black people. Thus, he is RACIST"


I hate the lazy jump.



I'd even understand "Well, he is stupid". Because that is an opinion based upon a person having information given to them and they did not process / accept it.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73566 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

JuiceTerry


Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31484 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Meh. This topic has been debated many times on this board. Nobody here is open minded enough to entertain the debate so it's pointless. My statement is my opinion. If that triggers you, so be it.



not remotely triggered. here is just one point of many: there were two presidential candidates. one is HRC. do you really expect the very small number of white supremacists (and whomever else you're claiming is "attracted" to DJT? ) to support her over ANY Republican?

If the voting population had to choose between two candidates, and they were identical except one believed we should give .000000009% of our GDP to black charities and the other believed we should give .00000001%, and white supremacists picked the former, does that make the former a de facto racist or--as you suggest--render that candidate somehow inherently attractive to white supremacists due to "what he stands for"?

Should he change that to .000000001%, to "distance himself" from these white supremacists?

Or, rather, should he make policies without regard to some fringe group with whom he has nothing to do?

Your "reasoning" is a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, among other fallacies (false equivalence comes to mind).

Would you apply the same fallacy to terrorists and evil dictators who have favored Dems over their Republican counterparts? Or are you going to tell me that has never happened?

I'm just getting started if you'd like to take this opportunity to "entertain the debate."

eta: if tl;dr, you are confusing correlation and causation-- a pretty standard error in everything from sports and nutrition, to politics and motorcycle repair.

This post was edited on 12/7/17 at 5:42 pm
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
30587 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:58 pm to
Is that Conyers to the left?

Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

And you can virtually frick anybody you want with a cell phone and some goggles
Except there were no cell phones and VR goggles in 1989 nitwit.

What there was were SEPARATELY OBTAINED confessions from 5 different thugs out on a CP "wilding" describing details of a rape which no one other than a witness or clairvoyant could know
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
12900 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Props to the brothers and sisters for giving us greens and okra, though.





Italians were eating greens 1000 years ago.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

What there was were SEPARATELY OBTAINED confessions from 5 different




Dude, I love you.


But, confessions can be mother-fricked out of people.

You know (I hope) that I am not soft on crime or pandering to black youths. But, a confession can be the LEAST reliable evidence in many cases.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

What there was were SEPARATELY OBTAINED confessions from 5 different thugs
Coerced and thrown in the garbage after they all did hard time when DNA EVIDENCE EXONERATED ALL OF THEM AND INCRIMINATED THE SERIAL RAPIST WHO CONFESSED FROM PRISON

quote:

describing details of a rape which no one other than a witness or clairvoyant could know

THAT WAS THE ACTUAL PERP

You should consider leaving this alone
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

You should consider leaving this alone
Not a chance.
The CP5 were there on scene, just as sure as OJ was at Nicole's place the evening she was murdered.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23698 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:16 pm to
Obama was born in Kenya?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73566 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

You should consider leaving this alone


I think you need to leave it alone. You arent very bright
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140352 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:17 pm to
The Kenyan race is awesome.
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:20 pm to
Here is one which we have to give credit to Paul Ryan, who has a superior view of Trump than any of us.
quote:


In May, Trump implied that Gonzalo Curiel, the federal judge presiding over a class action against the for-profit Trump University, could not fairly hear the case because of his Mexican heritage.

“He’s a Mexican,” Trump told CNN of Curiel. “We’re building a wall between here and Mexico. The answer is, he is giving us very unfair rulings — rulings that people can’t even believe.”

Curiel, it should be noted, is an American citizen who was born in Indiana. And as a prosecutor in the late 1990s, he went after Mexican drug cartels, making him a target for assassination by a Tijuana drug lord.

Even members of Trump’s own party slammed the racist remarks.

“Claiming a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment,” House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a reaction to Trump’s comments, though he clarified that he still endorses the nominee.


Personally, I don't think Trump is an overt racist who routinely uses the N word, like many of us have heard used by the white crowd while growing up. He's more like the old frickers you see sitting on a 5 gallon bucket outside an old filling station who are somewhat uneducated and ignorant and extremely tone deaf. They don't know how stupid they really are and lack the self awareness to remedy the situation without outside help. Pre-senility seems to fit.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

But, confessions can be mother-fricked out of people.

Including physical descriptions of the victim and the fact the odd guy out who raped her was a PuertoRican . . . . several years before the PuertoRican confessed.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram