Started By
Message

Letting locals vote on CO2 storage approval rejected in Louisiana Legislature

Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:08 am
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43309 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:08 am
quote:

A slate of bills to give individual Louisiana parishes say-so over whether carbon dioxide sequestration projects can take place locally failed Tuesday in committee, effectively killing the effort for the legislative session.

Six proposals that would allow parishes to opt-in for a vote on whether to permit CO2 capture and sequestration failed in close votes before the House Natural Resources Committee.

House Bill 5 by Rep. Mike Johnson, R-Pineville, would have had the widest impact of all the bills. It would have given every parish authority to hold referendums on carbon projects and was rejected in a 7-9 vote.

“When a project affects an entire community, the community deserves a voice,” Johnson said in support of his bill.


https://lailluminator.com/2026/05/20/carbon-storage-4/

Reminder…Letlow supports this and her fiancé is a lobbyist for this.
This post was edited on 5/23/26 at 9:20 am
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
13556 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:11 am to
quote:

When a project affects an entire community, the community deserves a voice,” Johnson said in support of his bill


You silly little man...this is Louisiana. The politicians' pocketbook is the only voice they hear
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72591 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:12 am to
Cant have those pesky citizens derailing your slushy project money
Posted by tigerfootball10
Member since Sep 2005
10250 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:21 am to
Just some Good Ole Boys never meaning no harm…..
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
45404 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:34 am to
Just keep this crap north of Alexandria and nobody should have a problem with it.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43309 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:35 am to
The lobbyist money must be astronomical.

Almost all of the reps are telling their constituents to frick off.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59953 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:39 am to
Because nothing says "liberty" quite like the legislature declaring you can't have it.
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
47405 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:53 am to
Let's make those that vote for it go live by it.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43309 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:01 am to
It’s really telling how they are abandoning future oil and gas production for this scam.

I get that the state needs industry to locate here, but is it worth it?

Suppose Texas sweetens the deal and we are left nothing but this scam.
Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
1371 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:09 am to
I think Schamerhorn and others have presented similar bills and they were also snuffed out. Apparently, if you oppose this, you are ignorant and are lying about it. BTW, this is funded by the BBB. It is essentially oil company welfare.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
61166 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:15 am to
the biggest lie Americans have ever believed in the last 100 years is that we have a voice
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43309 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:39 am to
quote:

think Schamerhorn and others have presented similar bills and they were also snuffed out.


I believe there was/is 12 so far. Not sure the status on each, but they will never pass.

quote:

BTW, this is funded by the BBB. It is essentially oil company welfare.


It’s good for a few majors and is going to effectively lock up large swaths of minerals in perpetuity.

Not good for any smaller operators that might have interest in drilling here in the future.

The excuse is that the production is depleted, but that’s bullshite.

They ran off all the drilling with legacy lawsuits.
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Member since Jul 2018
8382 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:46 am to
quote:

I get that the state needs industry to locate here


then the legislature should get away from the ITEP model and write laws that don't require tax abatement approval for each project. Let businesses figure out their own math on the front end, without having to line pockets of the people that give them tax breaks. It's all a grift.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43309 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 11:53 am to
quote:

It's all a grift.


Top to bottom. Nothing ever changes.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16409 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Reminder…Letlow supports this and her fiancé is a lobbyist for this.


A US Senator has no bearing. This is all LA DNR regulated already just like oil and gas.

Fleming took the anti CCS crowd for the dim bulbs most are and acts like he can do something about it.

Try Harder. You sound like an Abita Hippie anti drilling for oil.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16409 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

It’s really telling how they are abandoning future oil and gas production for this scam.


The only oil and gas remaining in South Louisiana is subsalt besides some pockets in marshes. The tight shale already gave up its oil down here. Most collected around salt domes like at Ged and Hackberry. You need a new geologist.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16409 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

It’s good for a few majors and is going to effectively lock up large swaths of minerals in perpetuity.

Not good for any smaller operators that might have interest in drilling here in the future.

The excuse is that the production is depleted, but that’s bullshite.

They ran off all the drilling with legacy lawsuits.


Barge rigs have been sold off for that reason, most went to Nigeria. Hillcorp still has two drilling north of Mobile.

A small indie owned by a friend who helped flip Texas to the GOP starting in the 1960s and with non operating interests internationally allowed me to sit in on the president's presentation to him on a park bench on the MIssissippi River in NOLA a decade ago. I didn't know the name but this was a major subsalt natural gas reservoir with Chevron and MacMoRan as major partners. So as the find was described as well as the cost to drill each well outlined, 11 wells, for at least 500 billion cubic feet of natural gas recoverable with the largest drilling rig in the world under contract, he opted to sell his 15% share down to at least 5%. Due geology the wells could cost X amount of dollars or 10X per well.

The CO2 is already being sequestered in two area near Baton Rouge. Most of it and the pipeline infrastructure is in South Louisiana. It's really Mid state folks who have maybe 10 acres who think the government is going to take their land to give it away because the likes of Gen Honore, Soros and NOLA envirowhakcos are telling them that is what is happening.

Hell, I am more concerned about the loss of rice fields than anything else. CO2 might help those farmers make a living.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
11292 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 3:43 pm to
Landry and his cronies think carbon capture and sequestration is going to turn Louisiana’s economic fortunes around. I was always skeptical and think it’s a huge boondoggle.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43309 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Barge rigs have been sold off for that reason,


Tell me about it. I'm looking for a barge and a jack-up to drill in 90 feet and 16 feet of water. Can't get a barge rig until late December at the earliest.

quote:

The CO2 is already being sequestered in two area near Baton Rouge.


Yeah...Exxon paid Denbury something like 4 billion to make some of that happen.
I negotiated one in St. Landry. Several large land owners there and Point Coupee are concerned. Much larger land owners than Lacassine Co. I don't know how much Spook and Matilda leased.

quote:

Hell, I am more concerned about the loss of rice fields than anything else. CO2 might help those farmers make a living.


Don't worry. Henning will buy it all.

It's going to be a tough year for them. They get their payment in November though. The ones with cattle are doing well. Crawfish season was pretty good for them as well. A couple of them around your boy at Lacassine Co. have rice headed out and will be cutting soon. That's insane.
This post was edited on 5/23/26 at 3:55 pm
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16409 posts
Posted on 5/25/26 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

I don't know how much Spook and Matilda leased.


Leased? The family owns Ged and its legendary oilfield. More oil per surface acre in the history of oil, all gone now. That field also proved that salt domes trapped a lot of oil. Spook's son Gray runs all the companies now. Spook spends a lot of time on his luxury competitive sailing yacht.

As a kid, all the rice farmers had cattle and used them as part of their crop rotation for fallow years. Friends of my parents in Fannett, TX had 10,000 acres and when the owner retired, he cut the cattle back to 250 head. It was primarily a rice farm. He had sharecroppers doing the farming by the mid 70's
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram