- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawyers present Presidential pardon to Tina Peters's jailers. Colorado: "So?"
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:26 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:26 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Toughen up buttercup. Don’t be so sensitive. I know you are worried about the upvotes and downvotes. But maybe don’t be such a fragile flower.
if i were sensitive i wouldn't post here. i've been insulted by far better than you. i see those downvotes yesterday must have stung if you're still bringing it up though
quote:
You didn’t know the facts of what happened with Peters. You just ran with the talking points. Seems to be your forte. When I point it out it hurts your feelings. That’s not a me problem.
whatever you need to tell yourself
quote:
And I noticed you chose to avoid answering my question about specific cases the considered the merits. Telling.
and i notice you can't cite a single victory in trumps endless temper tantrum and fake election stealing meltdown, yet you cling to his claims. odd
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:32 pm to beaux duke
quote:
if i were sensitive i wouldn't post here. i've been insulted by far better than you. i see those downvotes yesterday must have stung if you're still bringing it up though
quote:
whatever you need to tell yourself
Well. It’s an objective fact you didn’t know the facts of the Peters case. I didn’t make that up. You showed us all.
quote:
and i notice you can't cite a single victory in trumps endless temper tantrum and fake election stealing meltdown, yet you cling to his claims. odd
Maybe SFP will bail you out. There is a slight actual argument to be made by you. You, like always, are ignorant to that fact. SFP knows, though.
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:36 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
o you know the difference between cases being decided in the merits or dismissed for alleged procedural defects? If you did you would know why I asked what did and why your response is moronic. Even for you. Which is pretty bad.
i know why you asked what you did - because you can't provide any examples of trump proving election fraud and want to hide behind excuses. why do you think those cases weren't heard - because of some deep democrat conspiracy, or because they were ridiculous made up bs no court would entertain?
feel free to link any thread with me whining about being insulted. i'm just laughing at you because you're on here every day talking down to people like you're some kind of wise man. as said yesterday, it's both hilarious and really sad at the same time. i feel sorry for you, there's clearly a large void in your life
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:38 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Where were all of these "Pardon Presentations" during the JILL HARRIS term?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:42 pm to FLTech
When did Biden's aides try to pardon someone for state crimes?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Let's try that differently.
Who "saved" data purportedly showing voter fraud that...checks notes....found nothing illegal.
Who "saved" data showing potential voter fraud that...checks notes....purportedly found nothing illegal.
The latter purported "finding" by a state legal system so deranged, so biased that it attempted to exclude the same GOP nominee from the general election ballot.
That is the state legal system in which you place your undivided trust?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:46 pm to beaux duke
quote:
i know why you asked what you did - because you can't provide any examples of trump proving election fraud and want to hide behind excuses.
Wrong again. I asked it because the vast majority of the cases were dismissed for procedural reasons and never had the merits considered. Which makes your “why hasn’t he won any cases” argument moot. Once again, you are ignorant.
quote:
why do you think those cases weren't heard - because of some deep democrat conspiracy, or because they were ridiculous made up bs no court would entertain?
Once again proving your ignorance. Procedure is why they weren’t heard. Not because of the merits. That is a fact. You not being able to wrap your head around it isn’t a me problem.
quote:
feel free to link any thread with me whining about being insulted.
This thread. About a page ago.
quote:
i feel sorry for you, there's clearly a large void in your life
I appreciate your concern. I think I’ll be ok, though.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When did Biden's aides try to pardon someone for state crimes?
When did Trump's aides try to pardon someone for state crimes?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:50 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The latter purported "finding" by a state legal system
Legal system? No.
It was published, publicly. The finding was by the public, as even the most hardened MAGA-types could access the data.
Again they found...nothing.
You need to learn the basic facts of this situation.
quote:
That is the state legal system in which you place your undivided trust?
And stop rallying around strawmen
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:51 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
When did Trump's aides try to pardon someone for state crimes?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:52 pm to BBONDS25
i love when you try to steer the conversation to legal procedure - rather than the facts of the case, that Tina Peters illegally accessed and took voter data - so you can really get into your lording bit. same bitch move as trump only playing his own courses. no wonder you love the guy. simp recognizes simp
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You need to pocket the term. You either don't know what it means or don't understand the post you are responding to.
And stop rallying around strawmen
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:58 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Arrest everyone there.
Problem solved.
Problem solved.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:59 pm to beaux duke
quote:No evidence from the case indicates she accessed or took personal voter data; the focus was on election equipment integrity.
Tina Peters illegally accessed and took voter data
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:05 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You need to pocket the term. You either don't know what it means or don't understand the post you are responding to.
Bro you argued that the determination was made via the legal system. That is completely false argument, as my post proved. Then you rallied around that false argument.
You need to learn the actual facts of this situation. The "legal system" didn't determine the data was worthless for Lindell and his agents. It was posted publicly for the literal world to judge. They found...nothing illegal.
It's a huge issue when discussing Tina Peters. People just make shite up to make her look good.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:06 pm to beaux duke
I find it interesting that you leftist are so committed to keeping a 70 year old lady in prison while actively cheering on the releasing murderers, rapist, and other hardened criminals back onto the streets.
Y’all are hypocrites
Y’all are hypocrites
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:07 pm to Bourre
quote:
I find it interesting that you leftist are so committed to keeping a 70 year old lady in prison while actively cheering on the releasing murderers, rapist, and other hardened criminals back onto the streets.
Y’all are hypocrites
Another example of a person arguing against a straw man
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Oh look, SFP on the same side as leftist…. Again
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:11 pm to beaux duke
quote:
i love when you try to steer the conversation to legal procedure - rather than the facts of the case
What? You asked why Trump hasn’t won court cases. The facts are that they were dismissed on procedural issues…not the merits. Do you understand what that means? Of course I’m going to steer the conversation to the relevant facts. Yeesh.
quote:
rather than the facts of the case, that Tina Peters illegally accessed and took voter data
Im not disputing this. 9 years for that is not justice. It’s vindictive and political. And you know it.
quote:
so you can really get into your lording bit. same bitch move as trump only playing his own courses. no wonder you love the guy. simp recognizes simp
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:13 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
Why is this fight happening now? I remember when this all went down, but I don’t recall it being a “sham trial”. Were the charges shite? I do remember Griswold going after her pretty hard. Out of all of the “blue” governors, Polis is as close to moderate as you can get.
She broke like 10 laws and the charges were brought up by a Republic DA. She got suckered into believing a fairytale by My Pillow Guy. She’s gonna die in Jail unless Trump finds a way to ignore the constitution one more time.
Popular
Back to top


1





