Started By
Message

Lawmakers reviewing FDIC limit

Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:22 pm
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38786 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:22 pm
CNBC

quote:

“I think that lifting the FDIC insurance cap is a good move,” Senator Elizabeth Warren,


I actually agree with Poco here
Posted by NCIS_76
Member since Jan 2021
5246 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I actually agree with Poco here


Better try to dissect the reason why she likes it.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61270 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:25 pm to
Now trying to backtrack and justify them bailing out their big money donors that had stacks in SVB.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14541 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

“I think that lifting the FDIC insurance cap is a good move,” Senator Elizabeth Warren,



This will not end well for the taxpayer.
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

I actually agree with Poco here


Me too.

Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422561 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.



This is the way
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38786 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.


This is the way


Yeah I like it too -
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27599 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.


This is the way. Leave it at $250k for all though. Allow a fee schedule for optional insurance over that. Only I'm not sure I like the idea of government getting into that business. As the pool grows it will be too enticing for lawmakers to not raid for other things.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14541 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:30 pm to
Who would be insuring the larger amounts?
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12505 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.

I don’t disagree with this but we all need to recognize that all this does is protect bank investors and pass on the cost to the consumer.
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
11506 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

I actually agree with Poco here


So you support fully socialized banking? Bet you are a "conservative" too.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422561 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

So you support fully socialized banking?

Wut?

Are you against FDIC?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422561 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

but we all need to recognize that all this does is protect bank investors and pass on the cost to the consumer.


Huh? The excess is paid for by the accounts over the universal limit. They choose to accept this cost.
Posted by Marquesa
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2020
1533 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:39 pm to
If they review the limit, they better not make it retro-active. Anything should be for a bank that goes under in the future - like 2025. Politicians are covering their assets and their donors assets with taxpayer money.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38786 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:40 pm to
quote:


So you support fully socialized banking? Bet you are a "conservative" too.


What do you think faster road there is?

Banking with 2-3 banks that won't let you buy bullets or raising limit protecting multiple banks
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
5906 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:41 pm to



Kind of a non issue. The regulators just ignored it last week.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12505 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Huh? The excess is paid for by the accounts over the universal limit. They choose to accept this cost.
all this is doing is making account holders essentially purchase insurance rather than forcing the bank’s assets to cover them.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15417 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.


This would be the solution.
Posted by bamacoullion
Fayette, Alabama
Member since Oct 2008
1772 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:50 pm to
Where they gonna get the money? There isn't nearly enough FDIC money to come close to covering 250g's!
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422561 posts
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

all this is doing is making account holders essentially purchase insurance rather than forcing the bank’s assets to cover them.

You mean like the FDIC?

Are you arguing we should abolish the FDIC entirely?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram