- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lawmakers reviewing FDIC limit
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:22 pm
CNBC
I actually agree with Poco here
quote:
“I think that lifting the FDIC insurance cap is a good move,” Senator Elizabeth Warren,
I actually agree with Poco here
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:24 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
I actually agree with Poco here
Better try to dissect the reason why she likes it.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:25 pm to thelawnwranglers
Now trying to backtrack and justify them bailing out their big money donors that had stacks in SVB.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:25 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
“I think that lifting the FDIC insurance cap is a good move,” Senator Elizabeth Warren,
This will not end well for the taxpayer.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:26 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
I actually agree with Poco here
Me too.
Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:27 pm to TSLG
quote:
Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.
This is the way
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.
This is the way
Yeah I like it too -
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:29 pm to TSLG
quote:
Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.
This is the way. Leave it at $250k for all though. Allow a fee schedule for optional insurance over that. Only I'm not sure I like the idea of government getting into that business. As the pool grows it will be too enticing for lawmakers to not raid for other things.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:30 pm to thelawnwranglers
Who would be insuring the larger amounts?
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:31 pm to TSLG
quote:
Raise it a bit for all, and allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.
I don’t disagree with this but we all need to recognize that all this does is protect bank investors and pass on the cost to the consumer.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:37 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
I actually agree with Poco here
So you support fully socialized banking? Bet you are a "conservative" too.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:38 pm to armsdealer
quote:
So you support fully socialized banking?
Wut?
Are you against FDIC?
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:39 pm to billjamin
quote:
but we all need to recognize that all this does is protect bank investors and pass on the cost to the consumer.
Huh? The excess is paid for by the accounts over the universal limit. They choose to accept this cost.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:39 pm to thelawnwranglers
If they review the limit, they better not make it retro-active. Anything should be for a bank that goes under in the future - like 2025. Politicians are covering their assets and their donors assets with taxpayer money.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:40 pm to armsdealer
quote:
So you support fully socialized banking? Bet you are a "conservative" too.
What do you think faster road there is?
Banking with 2-3 banks that won't let you buy bullets or raising limit protecting multiple banks
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:41 pm to thelawnwranglers
Kind of a non issue. The regulators just ignored it last week.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:all this is doing is making account holders essentially purchase insurance rather than forcing the bank’s assets to cover them.
Huh? The excess is paid for by the accounts over the universal limit. They choose to accept this cost.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:44 pm to TSLG
quote:
allow big account holders to pay a fee to insure huge accounts.
This would be the solution.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:50 pm to thelawnwranglers
Where they gonna get the money? There isn't nearly enough FDIC money to come close to covering 250g's!
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:58 pm to billjamin
quote:
all this is doing is making account holders essentially purchase insurance rather than forcing the bank’s assets to cover them.
You mean like the FDIC?
Are you arguing we should abolish the FDIC entirely?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News