- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lauren Boebert fail: confuses NYC restaurant “the cannibal” with Epstein eating people
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Matt Taibbi was right: “The Epstein files is the worst reported story of all time”
I think it's also a dog whistle for the lunatics on social media.
Just another chapter in the great American Psych Op..
Mountains of evidence, but just not quite enough to exercise those arrest warrants.
IMO we're closer to the end than many believed 2 years ago.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:57 pm to 632627
quote:
The idea that the elite class would conspire to commit cannibalism and all other crazy shite VIA EMAIL is asinine
Yeah, because there definitely never been a concept of “World’s Dumbest Criminals” in the history of ever. /s
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:58 pm to GumboPot
quote:
They are distracting you from the DOJ denying to hear the victims criminal complaints.
Serious question, what is stopping any of these alleged victims from walking into CNN and telling their story?
I agree with Matt Walsh's take on the Super Bowl commecial - there is nothing "silencing" these women. I would imagine every reporter in the world would run through a wall for an interview where names are dropped.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:09 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Serious question, what is stopping any of these alleged victims from walking into CNN and telling their story?
Why do people keep asking this when the answer is obvious as hell? Virginia Guiffre was killed for coming forward.
They don't because they don't want to be killed as well.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:10 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:Along with the best grape soda anyone has ever had - you are correct.
All that talk and excitement about pizzas and hotdogs and jerky is in no way normal or innocent.
It’s clearly coded language.
I don't know what the codes meant, but no adult has ever put that many references in email exchanges for its literal meaning.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:11 pm to captainFid
People don't dedicate a staff of employees to making sure they always have beef jerky on hand for "when it's needed" either.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:11 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Why do people keep asking this when the answer is obvious as hell? Virginia Guiffre was killed for coming forward.
They don't because they don't want to be killed as well.
How would that change by testifying on behalf of the DOJ?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:14 pm to Antonio Moss
I don't think the perps are afraid of the DoJ as things stand currently. What they fear is their names going public. These are business types. Public knowledge of their involvement with horrific crimes against children is not only not good for business, but might get your arse killed in the streets.
Also, if the public is made aware, there may become a sufficient groundswell of demand from the public for the DoJ to bring these people to justice.
Also, if the public is made aware, there may become a sufficient groundswell of demand from the public for the DoJ to bring these people to justice.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:14 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I've genuinely heard people make the claim that people don't ever talk about ordering pizza via email
that's the stuff they're hanging their hat on
that's the stuff they're hanging their hat on
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:18 pm to AlterEd
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:18 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
I agree with Matt Walsh's take on the Super Bowl commecial - there is nothing "silencing" these women. I would imagine every reporter in the world would run through a wall for an interview where names are dropped.
OK I can prove you wrong. Where are all the reporters running through walls to interview Jeffrey Epstein's niece? What about that woman from South Africa?
I have never see reporters running through walls for them.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:19 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I've genuinely heard people make the claim that people don't ever talk about ordering pizza via email
Millionaires/billionaires totally set up their own parties where they literally order pizza from local restaurants. Not a one of them have support staff/assistants who would do inane shite like that for them.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:21 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I don't think the perps are afraid of the DoJ as things stand currently.
Maybe they should be:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
PAM BONDI JUST PLAYED THE GREATEST TRAP IN POLITICAL HISTORY.
And Congress walked right into it.
Yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing. Routine questions.
Then she pulled out a document.
Labeled: "Jayapal Pramila — Search History."
The room went SILENT.
?? HERE'S WHAT HAPPENED
The DOJ gave Congress access to the unredacted Epstein files this week. Every member got their own login. Their own computer. Their own session.
What Congress didn't know?
The DOJ was tracking EVERY SINGLE SEARCH.
Every name they looked up.
Every document they opened.
Every file they downloaded.
ALL OF IT. LOGGED.
And Bondi brought the receipts to the hearing.
?? THE PANIC WAS INSTANT
Rep. Jayapal called it "spying on members of Congress."
Rep. Raskin accused Bondi of "blatant abuse of power."
Rep. Moskowitz said it was "suspicious and inappropriate."
They're FURIOUS.
But here's the question nobody in the media is asking:
Why are they so scared of their search history?
If you're searching for evidence of crimes against children — you'd be PROUD of that search history.
Unless you're not searching for evidence.
Unless you're searching for YOUR OWN NAME.
? THE GENIUS OF THE TRAP
Think about it.
Bondi didn't just release the files.
She released them on MONITORED COMPUTERS.
Every Congress member who rushed to search the files just told the DOJ exactly:
• WHO they're trying to protect
• WHAT names they're worried about
• WHICH connections they're trying to verify
The ones searching for "flights to the island" = investigators.
The ones searching for SPECIFIC NAMES = protectors.
Bondi now knows who's investigating and who's COVERING UP.
And she showed them she knows.
In front of cameras.
With a smile.
?? THE DHS SHUTDOWN — PERFECT TIMING
While Congress panics about their search history, DHS is shutting down SATURDAY.
Democrats blocked the funding bill. House members already left Washington.
The same week Congress gets caught searching Epstein files — they REFUSE to fund the department that investigates trafficking?
They're not defunding DHS to save money.
They're defunding it to STOP INVESTIGATIONS.
? CONNECT THE DOTS
Monday: Congress gets Epstein file access.
Tuesday: Members frantically search for names.
Wednesday: Bondi reveals she tracked everything.
Thursday: Democrats block DHS funding.
Friday: Government shutdown begins.
Five days. One pattern. PANIC.
They walked into the hearing thinking they were in control.
They walked out knowing Bondi has EVERYTHING.
Every search. Every name. Every cover-up attempt.
Logged. Documented. WEAPONIZED.
The hunter became the hunted.
And they did it to themselves.
? DARK TO LIGHT.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:22 pm to VoxDawg
Right. FISA works both ways. I guarantee they all shite their pants the moment they realized she had her search history.
We been trying to tell them. These people have all been under surveillance for years now.
We been trying to tell them. These people have all been under surveillance for years now.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:23 pm to TFH
quote:Pertaining to the Trump accusations, yes, but a lot of the other stuff is based on the actual emails.
That the files contain every wild allegation from tip lines made this whole thing ripe for idiocy.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:28 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Why the hell are people freezing jerky?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:30 pm to omegaman66
quote:
You don't need to refrigerate jerky.
quote:
Yes, refrigeration is a smart choice after opening jerky - especially if you don’t plan to finish it within a couple of days. While jerky is shelf-stable due to its low moisture content, once the seal is broken, it can begin absorbing moisture from the environment, increasing the risk of spoilage.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:31 pm to SoWhat
quote:
Why the hell are people freezing jerky?
quote:
Can I freeze jerky to make it last longer?
Absolutely. Freezing jerky is one of the most effective ways to preserve it for long-term storage, especially if you’ve purchased in bulk or made it at home. When stored in a freezer-safe, airtight container or vacuum-sealed bag, jerky can maintain its quality for up to 6 months or longer.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:31 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
I would imagine every reporter in the world would run through a wall for an interview where names are dropped.
Savannah Guthrie interviewed Virginia Roberts on an exclusive basis and now her mom's been kidnapped.... Not saying it's guaranteed to be related, but the situation has been moved to the "Interesting" file.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 3:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
She is so embarrassing
Yet some will still defend her here
Yet some will still defend her here
Popular
Back to top



0








