- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:32 pm to VolSquatch
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:32 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
Well I was posting the quote tweet mainly but yes maybe he does just want clicks. There seems to be a lot of agreement on the premise though.
I didn’t disagree that the cities listed are critical.
I don’t see where this year is any more critical than past years. There is no evidence of that.
But it could be a turning point, but it’s anybody’s guess.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:48 pm to doubleb
Russians hit high-rise building in Kharkiv: 31 people injured – photo, video
Oleksandr Shumilin, Tetyana Oliynyk — 2 January, 20:27
Russian forces have struck a high-rise residential building in the city of Kharkiv, injuring people and causing significant damage.
Source: Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov; Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy
Quote from Terekhov: "The enemy has carried out a strike on central Kharkiv… They hit a high-rise residential building in the city's Kyivskyi district. Early reports indicate that there are casualties and substantial destruction."
Details: Zelenskyy said later, citing early reports, that two missiles had been used in the attack.
Quote from Zelenskyy: "Early reports suggest two missiles were fired. Straight into a residential area. One of the buildings has been badly damaged. A rescue operation is ongoing now and all the necessary services have been deployed. The exact number of casualties is not yet known."
Ukrainska Pravda
Oleksandr Shumilin, Tetyana Oliynyk — 2 January, 20:27
Russian forces have struck a high-rise residential building in the city of Kharkiv, injuring people and causing significant damage.
Source: Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov; Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy
Quote from Terekhov: "The enemy has carried out a strike on central Kharkiv… They hit a high-rise residential building in the city's Kyivskyi district. Early reports indicate that there are casualties and substantial destruction."
Details: Zelenskyy said later, citing early reports, that two missiles had been used in the attack.
Quote from Zelenskyy: "Early reports suggest two missiles were fired. Straight into a residential area. One of the buildings has been badly damaged. A rescue operation is ongoing now and all the necessary services have been deployed. The exact number of casualties is not yet known."
Ukrainska Pravda
Posted on 1/2/26 at 2:55 pm to cypher
This all but guarantees Zelinsky's re-election
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:21 pm to CitizenK
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Zelensky: I met with Kyrylo Budanov and offered him the role of Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine. At this time, Ukraine needs a stronger focus on security, development of our Defense and Security Forces, and progress on the diplomatic track. The Office will serve these state priorities.
Budanov has specialized experience and the strength to deliver results. I have also instructed him, together with the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council and other leaders, to update and submit for approval the strategic foundations of our defense and national development, and outline next steps.
quote:
Zelensky met with Oleh Ivashchenko, Head of Ukraine’s Foreign Intelligence Service, who reported on security threats and efforts to weaken Russia’s economic and military potential. Zelensky said cutting Russia’s oil revenue and sanctions-evasion links will strengthen diplomacy and help end the war. Ivashchenko will now serve in a role within Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:06 pm to Coeur du Tigre
This poor guy looks exhausted before he even takes the position.....
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:26 pm to CitizenK
quote:
It was Russia who fomented and fed the protests.
Um... no. Not everything bad for US interests was caused by the Soviets.
Middle-class Iranians had long wanted Democracy and not to be ruled by a King and his elite cronies... they'd deposed him once (in 1953), the CIA and the British(and the oil industry) helped him retake power, which led to some bloody retribution... and that created the general anti-American/anti-British sentiment among the public. I'm not sure the Atheist Soviet Union would be that into installing a Fundamnetalist Islamic regime (trampling Islam inside of The Soviet Union was a big struggle for the U.S.S.R.)... also, The Shah was chummy enough with the Soviets that they viewed Iran as a potential ally...
I know I've mentioned this before, but Americans seem to have no idea that at the same time as the Iranian Revolution, the military dictatorship in neighboring Afghanistan (which had deposed the popular King of Afghanistan earlier in the decade) had been ousted by a People's Revolution, which sought to have the country officially join the U.S.S.R. that bordered it... the CIA funded and trained Saudi Mujaheideen to start a "Civil War" under the reasoning that Communist Athesim was working its way towards the Holy Land and Mecca and had to be stopped early. The Afghan government asked the Soviets to come help, and we Americans were told it was a 'Soviet Invasion'... and we believed it. A guy from Pakistan straightened that out for us in College... some people angrily didn't believe him. I brought it up in a Poli Sci class and the teacher said "yes, that's what happened... it's just too controversial to talk about it... we created a 'Vietnam' for the U.S.S.R. to get stuck in, as revenge." After the Soviets pulled out and the U.S.S.R. collapsed soon after, all those people who were in Carter's cabinet at the time tried to take credit for the idea in their memoirs.
Anyway, if the U.S.S.R. wanted to control/conquer Iran (as the Tsars had always wanted to do), turning it into a militant Shi'ite Islamic regime would not be the way to do it. The Soviets much preferred the secular Pan-Arab/Persian autocrats (Saddam, Gaddafi, Assad) who they understood to religious extremists they didn't. Putin is a bit different because he is not running Russia as an Atheist entity, but uses the Russian Orthodox Church much like the Mullahs use the Mosques.
Iran has long been a powderkeg. The people hate the regime they are under, and most of them had it much better under the Shah.
Ironically, pushing for education and modernization. and creating a growing and thriving urban middle-class, the Shah and others created the very segment of the population that would want them toppled the most. The poor are too desperate and concerned with eating tonight and tomorrow to pine for things like political autonomy.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:29 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
quote:
But not when it comes to the Baltic States?
They might want those, but won't be able to do anything about it for years if ever.
But,,,
quote:
Russia doesn't give a frick how long it takes if they get what they want.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:32 pm to CitizenK
quote:
Loss of Iran will definitely impact Russia's abilities on the front.
I'd hope there would be a Shahed drone shortage, but I think Russia makes or imports most of the parts for those from places other than Iran, now.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:39 pm to Lee B
Depends on what Russia is when (or if) they become capable of doing anything again. Is the next guy an extension of the Putin regime, something better or something worse?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:40 pm to Lee B
quote:
I'd hope there would be a Shahed drone shortage, but I think Russia makes or imports most of the parts for those from places other than Iran, now.
Yep this is accurate
Posted on 1/2/26 at 6:00 pm to Lee B
Iranians who were there tell me this, not US reports. Go play with you idiot profs who taught this.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 6:02 pm to VolSquatch
*WARNING*
*WARNING*
THIS IS A VALID SOURCE THAT STATES THAT THE KILL RATIO BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE UKRAINE IS 6:1. I KNOW THIS CAN BE TRIGGERING TO SOME OF YOU, SO TAKING A VALIUM, OR A VYVANCE OR SODA OR SOMETHING MIGHT BE REQUIRED BEFORE READING:
Russia lost 410k while only bringing in 406k this past year, and kill ratio is 6:1
TO BE CLEAR
THIS IS NOT CASUALTIES, THIS IS THE KILL RATIO, AND IT COMES FROM THE 4* GENERAL LEADING UKRAINE SO NOBODY FREAK OUT.

*WARNING*
THIS IS A VALID SOURCE THAT STATES THAT THE KILL RATIO BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE UKRAINE IS 6:1. I KNOW THIS CAN BE TRIGGERING TO SOME OF YOU, SO TAKING A VALIUM, OR A VYVANCE OR SODA OR SOMETHING MIGHT BE REQUIRED BEFORE READING:
Russia lost 410k while only bringing in 406k this past year, and kill ratio is 6:1
TO BE CLEAR
THIS IS NOT CASUALTIES, THIS IS THE KILL RATIO, AND IT COMES FROM THE 4* GENERAL LEADING UKRAINE SO NOBODY FREAK OUT.

Posted on 1/2/26 at 7:05 pm to Leopold
But Tucker Carlson was paid to go to Russia and report on how nice and reasonably priced their supermarkets were
And TUCKER SAID that the kill ratio was 1:8 in the other direction.
So who do we believe?
And TUCKER SAID that the kill ratio was 1:8 in the other direction.
So who do we believe?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 7:28 pm to Leopold
quote:
IT COMES FROM THE 4* GENERAL
Oh wow! And we know it's accurate because Ukraine has no incentive to be untruthful with Russian casualty figures
Posted on 1/2/26 at 7:28 pm to No Colors
Is there an option C somewhere?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 7:30 pm to No Colors
quote:
And TUCKER SAID that the kill ratio was 1:8 in the other direction.
Tucker has to be right. If it weren’t 1:8 Russia wouldn’t be breaking through the Ukrainian lines like a knife through butter.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 7:30 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
Is there an option C somewhere?
Yeah. It exists somewhere in the Reality Belt
Posted on 1/2/26 at 7:31 pm to No Colors
quote:
Yeah. It exists somewhere in the Reality Belt
Seems unreachable with current technology
Posted on 1/2/26 at 9:22 pm to No Colors
quote:
But Tucker Carlson was paid to go to Russia and report on how nice and reasonably priced their supermarkets were
That stupid phucker raved about a loaf of bread he could find and most any WalMart, then amazed at the cheap price of groceries he bought. "All" of those groceries are what a typical American eats in a week but the typical Russian family of 4 has that much to spend on groceries for a month.
He loved him some Col McGregor who is the same guy who advised Rumsfeld that he could take all of Iraq and pacify it with 17,000 soldiers. The Army said bullshite.
I could go on in almost perpetuity.
Posted on 1/3/26 at 2:16 am to No Colors
quote:He says what they paid him to say. Nothing more, nothing less.
But Tucker Carlson was paid to go to Russia and report on how nice and reasonably priced their supermarkets were
And TUCKER SAID that the kill ratio was 1:8 in the other direction.
Popular
Back to top


1




