Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict.

Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:01 pm to
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
7775 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Don't see how it changes anything.


When you have posters in here sky screaming every day about the cost of Russia obtaining land being so high and their capabilities deteriorating, and all the while Russia took MORE land at a lower cost this year, yeah it kind of does change things.

quote:

Also, keep in mind that Combine Arms includes logistics, and since the Russians have all but run out of troop transports and are using things like vans to transport men to the front, they may simply not be able to get troops to the front as fast as they could in the past. It may simply be a case of not getting them there fast enough to get killed.



Do you ever read your own posts so you can listen to yourself?

You're implying they took more land with fewer troops, therefore saying they got more efficient in 2025 and you don't even realize it

Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
7775 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Yes, but what must be kept in mind is that Ukraine's enlistment issues mean that they have substantially fewer frontline troops today than they did a year ago. They have tried to make up the difference with drones, but that doesn't really work.


And if that trend continues, what does 2026 look like?

Hopefully we actually start seeing the Russian economy impact their capabilities at the front moreso than we have to this point. The *trend* hasn't been looking so hot as of today.
Posted by Leopold
Columbia
Member since Sep 2013
1926 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

When you have posters in here sky screaming every day about the cost of Russia obtaining land being so high and their capabilities deteriorating, and all the while Russia took MORE land at a lower cost this year, yeah it kind of does change things.

'
Right. And when that 'more' land is still less than 1% of the country, the cost is massive. The Russians could take, say, 5x that what they took in 2025 and it still wouldn't be impressive, or even that consequential. The fact that they took at a reduced 'per kilometer' isn't important and changes no narratives.

quote:

You're implying they took more land with fewer troops, therefore saying they got more efficient in 2025 and you don't even realize i


I'm not implying it, I'm saying it. I'm also saying they are still SO bad at it that it doesn't matter, and that minor improvement means nothing.


Vol, are you by any chance 14 years old?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41883 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

When you have posters in here sky screaming every day about the cost of Russia obtaining land being so high and their capabilities deteriorating, and all the while Russia took MORE land at a lower cost this year, yeah it kind of does change things.


Not true, everything I’ve read indicate that Russian losses in 2025 were greater than their losses in 2024.

Sure they took more land, but it cost them more casualties.

And that doesn’t account for the tanks, artillery, vehicles, shells, and other munitions that they have spent. Nor does it account for their economic losses.

2025 was a bad year for Russia. You can’t sugarcoat it.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20773 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

2025 was a bad year for Russia. You can’t sugarcoat it.



And 2026 isn't off to a good start for them. Russia faces the real possibility of losing allies in Iran and Venezuela very soon.
Posted by Leopold
Columbia
Member since Sep 2013
1926 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Where is Tulsi...?


You mean the Russian operative....?

Take a look at her bio, her husband's bio, and her actions as head of American Intelligence. It's beyond suspicious, it's openly sickening. (And too long to list here)
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 1:08 pm
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
7775 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

And when that 'more' land is still less than 1% of the country


oh brother

quote:

Vol, are you by any chance 14 years old?


Are you or any of your family members by chance located in Eastern Europe?
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 1:10 pm
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
7775 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

2025 was a bad year for Russia.


Absolutely, and it might not matter
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41883 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Absolutely, and it might not matter


lol

It already matters.

Ask any of the Russian families who lost family members. Ask those that have to care for their maimed live one. Ask all the Russians who are being forced to do without so Putin can win his war.

In just over 50 days the special operation will have lasted four years. Keep in mind too that in early 2014 Russia invaded Crimea and sent troops into the Donbas. That was twelve years ago.

Putting things in context. The US troops were in Vietnam approximately 12 years. Russia and Germany fought each other in WWII for three years 11 months approximately.

This war is becoming more and more of a drain on Russia than anyone could have imagined in 2014 or even in 2022.
Posted by Coeur du Tigre
It was just outside of Barstow...
Member since Nov 2008
3306 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:33 pm to
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
7775 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

It already matters.


It literally doesn't. Russia doesn't give a frick how long it takes if they get what they want.

quote:


Ask any of the Russian families who lost family members. Ask those that have to care for their maimed live one. Ask all the Russians who are being forced to do without so Putin can win his war.


Cop out. We were clearly discussing a macro level. The shite you took this morning might matter to you but it doesn't to anyone else in the world.
Posted by Leopold
Columbia
Member since Sep 2013
1926 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

It literally doesn't. Russia doesn't give a frick how long it takes if they get what they want.


Oh, this is genius.

The 1.2M people dead has no effect on the battlefield or on Russia itself.
The 10,000 tanks that they've lost.
The 20,000 armored fighting vehicles.
The 30,000 artillery pieces.
The destruction of 80 years of the hording of possibly the most sophisticated military of the 20th century.
The Navy that's losing to a country without a Navy.
The 800 airframes and a loss of a third of the Russian air force, who have largely been a non-factor on the frontlines of this conflict.
The continuing lead the Ukrainians are showing in the emerging drone technology and its application.
The billions of dollars European countries are investing in said technology
The inability to perform Combined Arms.
The complete lack of a Non-Commissioned Officer Corps.
The logistical failures of the Russian military.
The intelligence failures of the Russian military. .
The $5,000,000,000 worth of arms the US just announced they are selling to the Ukrainians.
The falling oil prices, now believed to be below the break-even point for the Russians, will have no effect on this war or the Russian economy.
The constant attacks on the oil production, refinement, transportation, and so forth doesn't matter.
The constant attacks on the Ukrainian civilian population that not only kills innocent women, children, and elderly (and men) but further steels the countries resolve to beat the Russians - meaningless.
The continued political, economic, strategic, and social isolation of the Russian state has no effect.
The continued sanctions on the Russian economy doesn't matter and won't in the future.
The continued failure of the Russians to build a halfway decent ballistic missile to be able to truly threaten Western peoples.
The loss of a massively important strategic base in Syria will have no impact on future geopolitical maneuvers.
The fact that Iran, a key strategic ally for Russia in the Middle East, is getting their teeth kicked in by the Israeli's and is begging for Russia's help, is unimportant.
The fact that Venezuela, another Russian ally who is becoming more and more isolated and possibly looking at open invasion, does not matter.
The fact that Russian arm sales have dropped to next to nothing, and possibly nothing, due to not only their failures in this conflict but also because the Russians desperately need them for themselves to stay in this war.
The fact that Russia in becoming increasingly under China's thumb and possibly a vassal state to the Chinese won't affect anyone.
The fact that the European have confiscated hundreds of billions of dollars of Russian assets and are using the interest rates to fund the economic, military, and strategic interests of the Ukrainians is completely meaningless.
The fact that the Europeans are now seriously threatening to take the principle of those assets is also meaningless.
The fact that the Russians are threatening, directly, the lives of the Belgium leadership should they take the $140B in Russian assets currently under Belgium control will have no consequences at all.
The orders of hundreds of European fighter jets for the Ukrainians, probably being paid for by those frozen Russian assets doesn't matter.
The fact that multiple countries, including a direct neighbor to Russia, Finland, have joined NATO and are working with the other members to supply Russia doesn't matter.
The fact that non-European Western countries like Japan, Australia, Canada, and others are helping the Ukraine while other countries like North Korea, China, and Iran are at least working with the Russians is irrelevant.
And lastly,
The fact that Trump and Putin seem to be largely on the same page politically and diplomatically and that this is a COMPLETE switch from the US policy of the last, oh, century or so doesn't matter.
And that there might currently be a falling out of that relationship.
The fact that Europe is now spending more and more on their own militaries as a direct result, and that MULTIPLE COUNTRIES ARE TALKING ABOUT BECOMING NUCLEAR POWERS IS TOTALLY MEANINGLESS TO EVERY MEMBER ON THIS PLANET.

None of that matters, ya'll.

VolSquatch has told us so.

DOES ANYBODY SEE WHAT I"M DEALING WITH HERE??


(Ya'll feel free to add to this list, no matter who it benefits, Russia or the Ukraine, 'cause it doesn't matter anyway....)
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 2:28 pm
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61382 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

VolSquatch has told us so. DOES ANYBODY SEE WHAT I"M DEALING WITH HERE??


Yep. I still don’t know what he believes, but being a contrarian with a passion for arguing about anything seems to be a hobby for him.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
7775 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 2:20 pm to
Leopold, Are you fricking retarded?

quote:

2025 was a bad year for Russia.


quote:

And it might not matter



That was the exchange.

Yes, 2025 being bad for Russia might not matter in terms of the end result. The end result isn't decided, no matter how much you delude yourself into thinking it is.

This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 2:54 pm
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
7775 posts
Posted on 1/1/26 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Yep. I still don’t know what he believes


What about anyone'e beliefs do you need to know to discuss a war with them?

Do I need to say "Ukraine is stunning and brave" every day at 12pm to signal to everyone that I have the "correct" opinion?
Jump to page
Page First 451 452 453
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 453 of 453Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram