- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:26 pm to Coeur du Tigre
Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:26 pm to Coeur du Tigre
quote:PFFFTTT!!
Estonia is ready to provide Ukraine with a contingent of one company
As of 12/31/24 Estonia's biggest company only had a market cap of $1.1 billion....

Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:32 pm to VolSquatch
quote:Liars lie.
Everyone here knows Cope is unhinged.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:46 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
How many of the 200 were actually executed?
I'll save you the trouble. None.
They appealed and were set free.
You have a major rhetorical problem with your conclusion that nobody has been wrongfully executed in the last 45 years (which I think you started in the 80's).
Every person exonerated had exceptional scrutiny applied to their case, that happens in very few of the cases and they are essentially low hanging fruit. Thise cases required exceptional scrutiny and finding extrodanary evidence. That process has proven a multi-percent failure rate in DP convictions. The idea that every single one of those were caught and got the right people and resourses allocated to that case and they were able to develop the extraordinary evidence to overturn a DP conviction is delusional.
You are asking for something that nobody can know but the known failure rate added to the fact that the majority of DP convictions never have the level of scrutiny that many of the ones overturned did would lead the the logical conclusion that every person put to death since the 80s was guilty of the crime they were convicted for was not guilty.
I am not a fan of the death penalty for four reasons:
1. I do not think it is the ultimate punishment. One way to support this is how many people calling suicide the easy way out, or calling those that commit suicide cowards.
2. It can never be reversed
3. I fall in line with Ben Franklin's opinion of Blackstone's ratio
4. The vast majority of death penalty cases don't have what I would consider a good defence and normally the appeals process is very pro-forma and done at an even lower level.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:52 pm to Coeur du Tigre
Extensive thread proving that China is profiting greatly by propping up Russia and helping kill Ukrainian civilians every day. Time for the Flight of the Flamingos.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:59 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
It's kind of a double edged sword because the constitution forbidding elections under martial law opens up the potential for corruption, but holding an election under martial law obvious has it's own corruption potential too
Everything is a double edge sword.
Yes, martial law could be declared for bogus reasons and effectively, the elected leaders at the time become permanent if they left martial law in place. While via a different mechanism this is what Xi did in China, he made himself a lifetime ruler.
Here is the rub, every time I ask someone to make the argument given the actual situation vs some amorphous it is a potentially bad approach I get nothing back.
Make the argument that Ukraine given the facts of the war and occupation should not be under martial law. If you can't then don't try to make gotcha moments out of a country following their constitution.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:00 pm to Coeur du Tigre
quote:
Estonia is ready to provide Ukraine with a contingent of one company, sending it to the country as part of a "coalition of the willing."
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:06 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
It would take what...a 10:1 kill ratio to even this out among active/reserves?
I doubt that's happening.
Not offered for the proof of the matter, just an interesting anecdotal point
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:17 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
Make the argument that Ukraine given the facts of the war and occupation should not be under martial law. If you can't then don't try to make gotcha moments out of a country following their constitution.
If Ukraine could do something to 100% win the war (without some mass causality event of civilians anywhere) but it violated their constitution, would you support them doing it?
Mainly just curious here to see if you see constitutions as essentially infallible, or if in certain circumstances you need to bend them some (but absolutely justify it when you do). And to be clear, making an argument about not wanting to bend the Constitution to *have* an election is a much lesser sin than say if Trump bent our constitution to *not* have an election.
I don't even really disagree with you all that much. But I do think you and others aren't telling the whole story by not acknowledging very real reasons why people are skeptical of the Zelensky government.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:19 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
You are asking for something that nobody can know
quote:
the known failure rate
The known failure rate of *convictions*, not executions
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:22 pm to LSURussian
And I was replying to Cope when you replied to me originally. Is it that hard to understand how a thread works?
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:25 pm to MoarKilometers
Well he is the most unhinged regular
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:26 pm to Coeur du Tigre
resurrecting the poison pill from 2022....
Lavrov pours cold water on Ukraine peace process
August 20, 2025, 02:20 PM
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s recent remarks have made it clear that Moscow is determined to subjugate all of Ukraine and derail any Western arrangements for effective post-war security guarantees for Kyiv, Politico reported on Aug. 20.
Lavrov reiterated that Russia wants Ukraine to adopt neutrality, reduce its military forces, and abandon its NATO aspirations.
“Moscow will not agree to collective security guarantees reached without Russia’s participation,” Lavrov said at a news conference following talks with Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi.
“Russia will agree only if security guarantees for Ukraine are provided on equal terms with countries such as China, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.”
Any role for Beijing or Moscow in shaping these guarantees complicates efforts by Western allies, the report noted. Even as they work on a defense plan for Ukraine to accompany a cease-fire or peace accord, Russia’s demands pose significant hurdles.
Lavrov also described a planned meeting between Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as “a distant prospect,” suggesting that the Kremlin is not ready to advance talks to end the war.
He revisited an idea first proposed during peace negotiations in Istanbul in April 2022: creating an international coalition of security guarantors for Ukraine. That plan stalled in the West after Moscow insisted that all participating countries—including Russia—must approve it unanimously before any guarantees could take effect.
“I am confident that in the West—primarily in the United States—they fully understand that discussing security without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere,” Lavrov said.
NV
Lavrov pours cold water on Ukraine peace process
August 20, 2025, 02:20 PM
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s recent remarks have made it clear that Moscow is determined to subjugate all of Ukraine and derail any Western arrangements for effective post-war security guarantees for Kyiv, Politico reported on Aug. 20.
Lavrov reiterated that Russia wants Ukraine to adopt neutrality, reduce its military forces, and abandon its NATO aspirations.
“Moscow will not agree to collective security guarantees reached without Russia’s participation,” Lavrov said at a news conference following talks with Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi.
“Russia will agree only if security guarantees for Ukraine are provided on equal terms with countries such as China, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.”
Any role for Beijing or Moscow in shaping these guarantees complicates efforts by Western allies, the report noted. Even as they work on a defense plan for Ukraine to accompany a cease-fire or peace accord, Russia’s demands pose significant hurdles.
Lavrov also described a planned meeting between Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as “a distant prospect,” suggesting that the Kremlin is not ready to advance talks to end the war.
He revisited an idea first proposed during peace negotiations in Istanbul in April 2022: creating an international coalition of security guarantors for Ukraine. That plan stalled in the West after Moscow insisted that all participating countries—including Russia—must approve it unanimously before any guarantees could take effect.
“I am confident that in the West—primarily in the United States—they fully understand that discussing security without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere,” Lavrov said.
NV
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:29 pm to texag7
Ukraine could make use of some of that for drone warfare.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:36 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
The known failure rate of *convictions*, not executions
I honestly can't figure out if you are stupid or think everyone else is stupid.
We know we have a significant rate of incorrect convictions.
We know many of these convictions did not see near the level of competent scrutiny and resourses applied to them that found the truth.
Thinking that every incorrect conviction and subsequent execution was found and proved is beyond delusional.
You should know you are asking for proof that does not exist whether or not anyone has been incorrectly been executed or not. It is a poor attempt at a rhetorical trap.
Just consider this in your mind: if an omniscient and omnipowerful entity offered you a bet where you got all your desires if you were right and the bet was whether or not a single not guilty person has been put to death in the US in tha last 45 years which side would you bet? I am convinced that taking the bet someone has been executed wrongfully is the biggest lock of the decade.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:43 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
We know we have a significant rate of incorrect convictions.
We know many of these convictions did not see near the level of competent scrutiny and resourses applied to them that found the truth.
Thinking that every incorrect conviction and subsequent execution was found and proved is beyond delusional.
You should know you are asking for proof that does not exist whether or not anyone has been incorrectly been executed or not. It is a poor attempt at a rhetorical trap.
Just consider this in your mind: if an omniscient and omnipowerful entity offered you a bet where you got all your desires if you were right and the bet was whether or not a single not guilty person has been put to death in the US in tha last 45 years which side would you bet? I am convinced that taking the bet someone has been executed wrongfully is the biggest lock of the decade
I will acknowledge the possibility of the execution of innocents via death penalty in the time period I laid out. It's certainly possible.
But if the failure rate were as high as you were claiming, we would have at least ONE proven example of it. We don't. Coupled with leaps in tech involving forensics, cameras being everywhere (and most are extremely high quality even compared to the early 2000's), tracking devices being on most phones and many cars all the time. I think it's almost non-existent today and the data we do have backs me up.
I think it's extremely ironic that you're attempting to insult MY intelligence while also extrapolating statistics that show the justice system WORKING (not executing people who appealed and were found innocent) and using that as evidence that it doesn't work. You should think about the logic there.
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:48 pm to Coeur du Tigre
We've discussed the early days of Putin and Sechin and their rise to power from the mayor's office staff in St. Petersburg. Here are the details of how that all started -
Senator McCain was being polite.
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Senator McCain was being polite.
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:01 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
I honestly can't figure out if you are stupid or think everyone else is stupid.
I vote that he is both. He loves to twist things around like a 2 year old who gets his way. It make me wonder if he ever had even swat on the butt as a kid one single time or even told NO
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:09 pm to CitizenK
Kind of sad watching your brain turn to mush in real time.
I'm upping the age estimate to 85
quote:
ever had even swat on the butt as a kid one single time or even told NO
I'm upping the age estimate to 85
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:24 pm to CitizenK
quote:
. He loves to troll
FIFY
He comes to this thread just about every day to stir things up.
Troll-
quote:
noun 1. a person who makes a deliberately offensive or provocative online post.
quote:
verb 1. make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them:
Y’all need to ignore the guy.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:29 pm to doubleb
Says the multi-time proven liar
What a fricking joke
What a fricking joke
Popular
Back to top


1





