Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict.

Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:26 pm to
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135108 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Estonia is ready to provide Ukraine with a contingent of one company
PFFFTTT!!

As of 12/31/24 Estonia's biggest company only had a market cap of $1.1 billion....


Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
5063 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Everyone here knows Cope is unhinged.
Liars lie.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30716 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

How many of the 200 were actually executed?

I'll save you the trouble. None.

They appealed and were set free.


You have a major rhetorical problem with your conclusion that nobody has been wrongfully executed in the last 45 years (which I think you started in the 80's).

Every person exonerated had exceptional scrutiny applied to their case, that happens in very few of the cases and they are essentially low hanging fruit. Thise cases required exceptional scrutiny and finding extrodanary evidence. That process has proven a multi-percent failure rate in DP convictions. The idea that every single one of those were caught and got the right people and resourses allocated to that case and they were able to develop the extraordinary evidence to overturn a DP conviction is delusional.

You are asking for something that nobody can know but the known failure rate added to the fact that the majority of DP convictions never have the level of scrutiny that many of the ones overturned did would lead the the logical conclusion that every person put to death since the 80s was guilty of the crime they were convicted for was not guilty.

I am not a fan of the death penalty for four reasons:

1. I do not think it is the ultimate punishment. One way to support this is how many people calling suicide the easy way out, or calling those that commit suicide cowards.

2. It can never be reversed

3. I fall in line with Ben Franklin's opinion of Blackstone's ratio

4. The vast majority of death penalty cases don't have what I would consider a good defence and normally the appeals process is very pro-forma and done at an even lower level.
Posted by Coeur du Tigre
It was just outside of Barstow...
Member since Nov 2008
4660 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:52 pm to
Extensive thread proving that China is profiting greatly by propping up Russia and helping kill Ukrainian civilians every day. Time for the Flight of the Flamingos.


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30716 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

It's kind of a double edged sword because the constitution forbidding elections under martial law opens up the potential for corruption, but holding an election under martial law obvious has it's own corruption potential too


Everything is a double edge sword.

Yes, martial law could be declared for bogus reasons and effectively, the elected leaders at the time become permanent if they left martial law in place. While via a different mechanism this is what Xi did in China, he made himself a lifetime ruler.

Here is the rub, every time I ask someone to make the argument given the actual situation vs some amorphous it is a potentially bad approach I get nothing back.

Make the argument that Ukraine given the facts of the war and occupation should not be under martial law. If you can't then don't try to make gotcha moments out of a country following their constitution.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41448 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Estonia is ready to provide Ukraine with a contingent of one company, sending it to the country as part of a "coalition of the willing."




Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30716 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

It would take what...a 10:1 kill ratio to even this out among active/reserves?

I doubt that's happening.


Not offered for the proof of the matter, just an interesting anecdotal point

Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8453 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Make the argument that Ukraine given the facts of the war and occupation should not be under martial law. If you can't then don't try to make gotcha moments out of a country following their constitution.


If Ukraine could do something to 100% win the war (without some mass causality event of civilians anywhere) but it violated their constitution, would you support them doing it?
Mainly just curious here to see if you see constitutions as essentially infallible, or if in certain circumstances you need to bend them some (but absolutely justify it when you do). And to be clear, making an argument about not wanting to bend the Constitution to *have* an election is a much lesser sin than say if Trump bent our constitution to *not* have an election.

I don't even really disagree with you all that much. But I do think you and others aren't telling the whole story by not acknowledging very real reasons why people are skeptical of the Zelensky government.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8453 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:19 pm to
quote:


You are asking for something that nobody can know


quote:

the known failure rate




The known failure rate of *convictions*, not executions
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8453 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:22 pm to
And I was replying to Cope when you replied to me originally. Is it that hard to understand how a thread works?
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8453 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:25 pm to
Well he is the most unhinged regular
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5753 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:26 pm to
resurrecting the poison pill from 2022....

Lavrov pours cold water on Ukraine peace process

August 20, 2025, 02:20 PM

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s recent remarks have made it clear that Moscow is determined to subjugate all of Ukraine and derail any Western arrangements for effective post-war security guarantees for Kyiv, Politico reported on Aug. 20.

Lavrov reiterated that Russia wants Ukraine to adopt neutrality, reduce its military forces, and abandon its NATO aspirations.

“Moscow will not agree to collective security guarantees reached without Russia’s participation,” Lavrov said at a news conference following talks with Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi.

“Russia will agree only if security guarantees for Ukraine are provided on equal terms with countries such as China, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.”

Any role for Beijing or Moscow in shaping these guarantees complicates efforts by Western allies, the report noted. Even as they work on a defense plan for Ukraine to accompany a cease-fire or peace accord, Russia’s demands pose significant hurdles.

Lavrov also described a planned meeting between Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as “a distant prospect,” suggesting that the Kremlin is not ready to advance talks to end the war.

He revisited an idea first proposed during peace negotiations in Istanbul in April 2022: creating an international coalition of security guarantors for Ukraine. That plan stalled in the West after Moscow insisted that all participating countries—including Russia—must approve it unanimously before any guarantees could take effect.

“I am confident that in the West—primarily in the United States—they fully understand that discussing security without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere,” Lavrov said.

NV
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26960 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:29 pm to
Ukraine could make use of some of that for drone warfare.






Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30716 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:36 pm to
quote:



The known failure rate of *convictions*, not executions


I honestly can't figure out if you are stupid or think everyone else is stupid.


We know we have a significant rate of incorrect convictions.

We know many of these convictions did not see near the level of competent scrutiny and resourses applied to them that found the truth.

Thinking that every incorrect conviction and subsequent execution was found and proved is beyond delusional.

You should know you are asking for proof that does not exist whether or not anyone has been incorrectly been executed or not. It is a poor attempt at a rhetorical trap.

Just consider this in your mind: if an omniscient and omnipowerful entity offered you a bet where you got all your desires if you were right and the bet was whether or not a single not guilty person has been put to death in the US in tha last 45 years which side would you bet? I am convinced that taking the bet someone has been executed wrongfully is the biggest lock of the decade.

Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8453 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:43 pm to
quote:


We know we have a significant rate of incorrect convictions.

We know many of these convictions did not see near the level of competent scrutiny and resourses applied to them that found the truth.

Thinking that every incorrect conviction and subsequent execution was found and proved is beyond delusional.

You should know you are asking for proof that does not exist whether or not anyone has been incorrectly been executed or not. It is a poor attempt at a rhetorical trap.

Just consider this in your mind: if an omniscient and omnipowerful entity offered you a bet where you got all your desires if you were right and the bet was whether or not a single not guilty person has been put to death in the US in tha last 45 years which side would you bet? I am convinced that taking the bet someone has been executed wrongfully is the biggest lock of the decade


I will acknowledge the possibility of the execution of innocents via death penalty in the time period I laid out. It's certainly possible.

But if the failure rate were as high as you were claiming, we would have at least ONE proven example of it. We don't. Coupled with leaps in tech involving forensics, cameras being everywhere (and most are extremely high quality even compared to the early 2000's), tracking devices being on most phones and many cars all the time. I think it's almost non-existent today and the data we do have backs me up.

I think it's extremely ironic that you're attempting to insult MY intelligence while also extrapolating statistics that show the justice system WORKING (not executing people who appealed and were found innocent) and using that as evidence that it doesn't work. You should think about the logic there.
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 4:08 pm
Posted by Coeur du Tigre
It was just outside of Barstow...
Member since Nov 2008
4660 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 3:48 pm to
We've discussed the early days of Putin and Sechin and their rise to power from the mayor's office staff in St. Petersburg. Here are the details of how that all started -


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Senator McCain was being polite.

LINK

LINK

LINK

LINK

Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16171 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

I honestly can't figure out if you are stupid or think everyone else is stupid.


I vote that he is both. He loves to twist things around like a 2 year old who gets his way. It make me wonder if he ever had even swat on the butt as a kid one single time or even told NO
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8453 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:09 pm to
Kind of sad watching your brain turn to mush in real time.

quote:

ever had even swat on the butt as a kid one single time or even told NO


I'm upping the age estimate to 85
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 4:20 pm
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42780 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

. He loves to troll


FIFY

He comes to this thread just about every day to stir things up.

Troll-

quote:

noun 1. a person who makes a deliberately offensive or provocative online post.


quote:

verb 1. make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them:


Y’all need to ignore the guy.

Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8453 posts
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:29 pm to
Says the multi-time proven liar

What a fricking joke
first pageprev pagePage 140 of 698Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram