- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest conspiracy theory in the Karmelo Anthony trial
Posted on 6/9/26 at 8:59 am to Godfather1
Posted on 6/9/26 at 8:59 am to Godfather1
That appeal is a loser. This case should have never gone to trial.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:01 am to teke184
quote:
I don’t think ineffective counsel claims will be successful considering the case was shite.
I 100% agree. But I still think they’re gonna attempt it. Gotta milk that grift a little more.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:02 am to NIH
quote:
That appeal is a loser. This case should have never gone to trial.
Again, I agree.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:02 am to Godfather1
I will reiterate this.
Karmelo has a completely capable lawyer who is not a public defender.
Karmelo has a completely capable lawyer who is not a public defender.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:04 am to the808bass
Its very hard to defend when there is quite literally no defense
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:04 am to Godfather1
quote:
Now they have at least one basis for appeal: ineffective counsel.
They’ll try this and the racial deal with the jury.
Both will fail miserably.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:08 am to Fun Bunch
They didn’t get a single favorable point of testimony at trial. That is hard to to, ie never should have been tried.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:11 am to NIH
Most legal observers I have seen have said that the defense did not even get enough evidence in to have a self defense charge put in the jury instructions, and that if the prosecution pushed that issue they would have a good chance of winning on that issue. However they believe that they won't push it and that the judge will allow it just for appeal purposes.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:13 am to the808bass
quote:
Karmelo has a completely capable lawyer who is not a public defender.
Actually the guy is supposedly one of the best in the area.
If you think about it, that is how shite their case was. They had to hope they could get a black person on the trial who could cause a mistrial.
I am unsure of the prosecution even posted a plea deal because their case is so strong.
The prosecutions witnesses sink any viable sold defense claim and from the sounds of things, the defense witnesses were so bad they might as well been for the prosecution.
I am assuming they start deliberations today and they wait till tomorrow to make it seem like they thought a bunch on our before they find him guilty.
This case really is a open and shut as the Rittenhouse case was except opposite. This guy is straight guilty.
Perhaps the family one he was going away and wanted him to enjoy himself a bit before he went away.
He should've tried to get a plea deal for a favorable sentence of 20 to 30 years.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:16 am to thetempleowl
But then his family couldn't have milked idiots for all the money they could and spend it on escalades if they had plead early.
Now with a conviction they can continue to do that. A plea would have ended all of that
They don't give a frick about Karmelo
Now with a conviction they can continue to do that. A plea would have ended all of that
They don't give a frick about Karmelo
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:17 am to TigerBaitOohHaHa
well Austin's black friends weren't going to testify to that so it would have gone nowhere and probably backfired
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:18 am to thetempleowl
quote:
This case really is a open and shut as the Rittenhouse case was except opposite. This guy is straight guilty.
Never underestimate a jury’s ability to frick it up.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:29 am to Robin Masters
It seems there is a sentiment shift among the psychos defending Anthony. Apparently, if you pick a fight with someone, you get to murder them in self defense and simply claim you felt threatened.
Popular
Back to top


1






