LA Senate Primary Race- Republican Debate

Are others not furious that Cassidy and Letlow refuse to agree to a debate? The arrogance and entitlement of this attitude should be extremely telling that they think they don't have an obligation to actually demonstrate their views publicly and under scrutiny so that Republican voters can actually determine whether the candidates align with their views or not.

Cassidy would rather run simply off of name recognition, incumbency, and a big budget for campaign ads. Letlow off of Trump's and Landry's endorsement. The fact is that most voters don't know anything about Letlow (nor does Trump) except what her campaign spews and that she is endorsed by Trump. She obviously doesn't want more than that to be known. Cassidy obviously doesn't want a debate because his record will be used against him.

From my understanding, Fleming has agreed to debate with no conditions.

What has anyone seen from Letlow that makes her a trustworthy and reliable LA conservative to win this senate seat without going out and presenting her positions, record, and convictions to the voters? She effectively is asking us to hand her this seat, which she could potentially be in position to hold for decades on end. Why does she deserve this when we don't have any information that indicates that she is a reliable conservative? This state has failed to put reliable conservatives in office and it hurts our interests on a national level. Senators hold their seat for 6 years. This demands a public debate so that voters can at least have some very minimal critical analysis of the people who are asking to be selected to represent the state on matters of national existential significance in the Senate for a minimum of 6 years.

The "anybody but Cassidy" crowd permitting this without any consideration that it puts us right back in the same boat with an opportunist and backroom deal politicking when we have another option is puzzling to me. I personally hope everyone here seriously considers this refusal to openly discuss political positions while asking people to elect you to one of the most important political offices in the country to be an enormous red flag and a disqualifying attitude of contempt towards the voters.

I think my support for Fleming in this race here is obvious, but I'd love to see a debate to flesh out ALL of the candidates' ideas very openly and to put them on the record where they can all be held accountable in the future. For those who support Letlow, can you explain where your confidence comes from outside of "anybody but Cassidy" or why you would support her over Fleming?