- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LA Firefighters told to leave smoldering blaze that ended up causing Palisades fire…
Posted on 10/31/25 at 9:42 am
Posted on 10/31/25 at 9:42 am
Posted on 10/31/25 at 9:44 am to Placekicker
LAFD Whistleblowers Destroy Official Narrative on Palisades Fire Cause
According to multiple Los Angeles Fire Department firefighters, crews mopping up the January 1, 2025, Lachman Fire in Pacific Palisades were ordered by a Battalion Chief on January 2 to roll up hoses and leave the scene even though the ground was smoldering and "red hot coals" were found in the area.
The fire continued to smolder and burn in underground root systems, according to federal investigators, until January 7, when strong winds whipped it back up. That blaze came to be known as the Palisades Fire, which decimated an entire community and killed 12 people.
LAFD knew "immediately" that the January 7 fire was a reignition of the Lachman Fire, according to the messages, yet the Incident Commander and other members of LAFD's command staff vehemently denied any link until federal investigators forced their hand in early October.
According to multiple Los Angeles Fire Department firefighters, crews mopping up the January 1, 2025, Lachman Fire in Pacific Palisades were ordered by a Battalion Chief on January 2 to roll up hoses and leave the scene even though the ground was smoldering and "red hot coals" were found in the area.
The fire continued to smolder and burn in underground root systems, according to federal investigators, until January 7, when strong winds whipped it back up. That blaze came to be known as the Palisades Fire, which decimated an entire community and killed 12 people.
LAFD knew "immediately" that the January 7 fire was a reignition of the Lachman Fire, according to the messages, yet the Incident Commander and other members of LAFD's command staff vehemently denied any link until federal investigators forced their hand in early October.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 10/31/25 at 9:49 am to Placekicker
Gavin 2028! Hah!
This post was edited on 10/31/25 at 9:52 am
Posted on 10/31/25 at 9:54 am to Placekicker
That is... I don't even have words for it. 
Posted on 10/31/25 at 9:56 am to SallysHuman
quote:
That is... I don't even have words for it
It’s tough not to be open to the idea that they wanted a fire out there when they leave the reservoir that feed the hydrants empty, order the fire fighters out then refuse to approve permits to rebuild and hand the land to developers.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 10:04 am to Placekicker
Future Headline: "Several LA Firefighters Die Under Mysterious Circumstances"
Online Bootlickers SFP and Boosie: "That's Just a Coincidence!"
Online Bootlickers SFP and Boosie: "That's Just a Coincidence!"
Posted on 10/31/25 at 10:13 am to Placekicker
quote:
[Fire] crews mopping up the January 1, 2025, Lachman Fire in Pacific Palisades were ordered by a Battalion Chief on January 2 to roll up hoses and leave the scene even though the ground was smoldering and "red hot coals" were found in the area.
Who' surprised?
Whomever the officials were who gave these orders needs to be investigated by the Federales indicted along with all co-conspirator for negligent homicide, malicious intent, sabotage, and terrorism.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 10:29 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Whomever the officials were who gave these orders needs to be investigated by the Federales indicted along with all co-conspirator for negligent homicide, malicious intent, sabotage, and terrorism.
Negligent homicide is reasonable; the others are foolish. You can’t indict them for malicious intent, sabotage or terrorism without evidence.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 10:44 am to Penrod
quote:
You can’t indict them for malicious intent, sabotage or terrorism without evidence.
Without any official investigation, even the "negligence" charge goes away.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 10:54 am to EphesianArmor
LA City Fire or LA County Fire ? I think Palisades is City Fire.
I saw a report on NewsNation were about 40% of LA City's apparatus were in a repair yard broken down.
I saw a report on NewsNation were about 40% of LA City's apparatus were in a repair yard broken down.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 11:00 am to OchoDedos
quote:
LA City Fire or LA County Fire ? I think Palisades is City Fire.
Book 'em for ALL on negligence for those fires, Dan-O.
quote:
I saw a report on NewsNation were about 40% of LA City's apparatus were in a repair yard broken down.
Interesting. In a bad way. Grounds for official grounds for negligence, malfeasance, conspiracy charges, and theft of funds?
Posted on 10/31/25 at 11:47 am to Placekicker
Need to put low income housing somewhere.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 11:53 am to SallysHuman
quote:Jesus. We saw the fire, we contained the fire, we then left it going.
That is... I don't even have words for it
Stupid cad even knows the small brush burn pile in my yard if left smoldering for days can instantly be reignited in seconds with a rake.
Seasoned firefighters.
Seems on purpose by that supervisor.
Gross negligence doesn't even begin to describe this.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 3:22 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Without any official investigation, even the "negligence" charge goes away.
Ahh, so you’re recommending they investigate, not indict, as you wrote.
Popular
Back to top
3









