re: Knee to the neck just debunked in court

quote:

---

compressed by a mans body weight

---

What percentage of his body weight was on your hero’s neck?

quote:

---

these folks have outed themselves as being highly ignorant of simple health knowledge. surely someone can breath 100% fine while unconscious, handcuffed, and being compressed by a mans body weight. on what planet could that possibly matter?

its a shame they are so emotional they made their decision DC is innocent only because SJWs rioted afterwards any facts or evidence otherwise be damned.

---

I can understand wanting to introduce defense evidence that the suspect was high as a kite and other potentially contributing factors. But to argue that what happened was good policing is just insane. I don't know if it was criminal or not or if these particular charges have been properly selected, but why go so far the other direction and literally claim that kneeling on a neck/back would not have an impact?

quote:

---

What percentage of his body weight was on your hero’s body?

---

any amount of excess restriction of chest wall excursion in a person with respiratory distress may be life threatening. its like if grandma was having trouble breathing so you decide to help her by holding a pillow over her head.

quote:

---

So you have no idea? Got it?

---

so you deny the fact that it is dangerous. got it.

quote:

---

any amount of excess restriction of chest wall excursion in a person with respiratory distress may be life threatening

---

This is a lie.

You know it.

A knee barely touching would have zero effect.

You commies lie way too much ever after claiming that words have meaning and to trust science.

.000001 pounds would have zero effect.

.000001 pounds would be excess restriction.

You are actually the one being emotional because you don’t have the data needed.

Typical though.

quote:

---

You commies lie way too much ever after claiming that words have meaning and to trust science.

.000001 pounds would have zero effect.

.000001 pounds would be excess restriction.

---

obviously no one was referring to an insignificant amount like 0.00000001 lbs that would not cause any meaningful restriction. but go ahead and pretend that refutes the fact that the knee on the back technique is dangerous. If you dont think even 15% of a mans body weight could do that I have a bridge to sell you.

quote:

---

Who overdosed on fentanyl?

---

not George floyd. It was the combination of the fentanyl, the meth, the advanced heart disease, and the stress of being arrested that gave him a heart attack before he ever made it out of the car. Or rather sudden cardiac death

quote:

---

so you deny the fact that it is dangerous. got it.

---

The police were called, not an ambulance! The police were there to apprehend someone who committed a crime, not monitor his vitals. They called someone else for that, and while they waited they subdued him the way they were trained by the police dept.

quote:

---

The police were called, not an ambulance! The police were there to apprehend someone who committed a crime, not monitor his vitals. They called someone else for that, and while they waited they subdued him the way they were trained by the police dept.

---

they are taught to monitor things like pulse, respiration, and consciousness when applying what their training determined to be dangerous restraint like the knee on the back.