- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kavanaugh's two biggest arguments are incorrect
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:31 pm to texridder
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:31 pm to texridder
quote:Well, i hate to burst your bubble chief, but Kavs number one argument was that he was innocent of the allegations.
Kavanaugh's two big arguments today were:
His second argument was that all alleged witnesses to said allegation denied it ever took place.
Welcome to reality
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:32 pm to texridder
Not a trial, it was a job interview and he was fantastic.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:32 pm to texridder
A-
This is actually correct.
It was reported while he was on the shortlist, and rumored to be a top 3 pick.
Your point however is the opposite; It shows just how sinister the Lefts motive was with this. They waited like a snake in the grass with this. They knew weeks in advance of last week.
They waited and waited, and then destroyed this mans good name; when the whole time they could have turned it over to the FBI to investigate. But they didn't, why? Because they know its horseshite.
B-
lol, so stupid, not even worth a rebuttal.
quote:
Not true. Ford got in touch with her congressman and called the Wash Post tip line on July 6, 2018, while Kavanaugh was still on Trump's short list of nominees. Kavanaugh nomination was not announced until July 9, 2018.
Kavanaugh was not accused because of his nomination. Ford had already made her complaint to her congressman.
This is actually correct.
It was reported while he was on the shortlist, and rumored to be a top 3 pick.
Your point however is the opposite; It shows just how sinister the Lefts motive was with this. They waited like a snake in the grass with this. They knew weeks in advance of last week.
They waited and waited, and then destroyed this mans good name; when the whole time they could have turned it over to the FBI to investigate. But they didn't, why? Because they know its horseshite.
B-
lol, so stupid, not even worth a rebuttal.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:32 pm to texridder
: 

This post was edited on 9/27/18 at 11:36 pm
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:34 pm to texridder
Ford waited for his calendar until she named the names.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:37 pm to texridder
1. He was on the short list. She wanted to sully his character just in case he was nominated.
2. Except she said that there were only 4 guys present.
2. Except she said that there were only 4 guys present.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:37 pm to texridder
In point 1, it might be helpful to mention that Ford wanted to remain anonymous and her letter was leaked by someone from difi or her reps staff.
You might want to also consider the timing of the leak right before comm vote and that difi had ample opportunity to question Kav on this and investigate the claim.
You might want to also consider the timing of the leak right before comm vote and that difi had ample opportunity to question Kav on this and investigate the claim.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:38 pm to texridder
quote:
that the Democrats set him up for a character assassination because of his nomination for the Supreme Court
You'd have to be really fricked up in the head to believe this is an incorrect argument considering FEINSTEIN SAT ON THE ALLEGATION FOR 2 MONTHS UNTIL THE EVE OF THE CONFIRMATION VOTE THEN LEAKED IT
quote:
that Kavanaugh's calendar shows that there were no calendar entries that made it possible for Kavanaugh to have been Ford's attacker.
This is a very huge logical leap for you to make considering Ford never gave a specific date which the party allegedly occurred and scheduling a beer run with your buds doesn't mean shite if you can't fill in the rest of the dots with ACTUAL VERIFIED EVIDENCE, who knows what they did that day? NO ONE KNOWS. This fool's such a brainwashed, blue pill idiot.


Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:38 pm to texridder
5.5 downvotes a minute. Impressive
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:39 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
GFY sky screamer
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:41 pm to texridder
quote:
Kavanaugh was not accused because of his nomination. Ford had already made her complaint to her congressman.
What idiotic thought. You’re locking some time frame for the acts in question in July. That makes no fricking sense.
quote:
Two of the people that were named by Ford as being at the party before the calendar came out --(Judge and P.J.--) are listed on the calendar. And Kavanaugh testified at the hearing that "Skis" means beer. So Kavanaugh's own calander describes a party that fits Ford's account of the party where she was attacked.
Yeah except Blasey never mentioned 3 (three) other guys in addition to 3-4 claimed.
You
fricking
Pathetic
Idiot
YFPI
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:41 pm to texridder
What a waste of time.
You do realize the godless left has files, records on any potential nominee right?
And ",witnesses" ready to go. It's called prep work.
They file the false accusations on several nominees, the godless libtards senator simply wait to see who's nominated & viola...instant lies appear.
They've been doing it for decades. You should be smart enough to catch on. You really should.
You do realize the godless left has files, records on any potential nominee right?
And ",witnesses" ready to go. It's called prep work.
They file the false accusations on several nominees, the godless libtards senator simply wait to see who's nominated & viola...instant lies appear.
They've been doing it for decades. You should be smart enough to catch on. You really should.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:43 pm to texridder
frick you a-hole.
This post was edited on 9/27/18 at 11:45 pm
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:45 pm to GeorgePaton
texridder has GOT to have some sort of financial stake in a 5-4 conservative court.
Maybe he has been told that a certain law that gives his legal practice a lot of business will be struck down soon?
Maybe he has been told that a certain law that gives his legal practice a lot of business will be struck down soon?
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:48 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
texridder has GOT to have some sort of financial stake in a 5-4 conservative court.
Maybe he has been told that a certain law that gives his legal practice a lot of business will be struck down soon?
WAIT WAIT WAIT this dumbass is a LAWYER? If thats how low the standard is nowadays, I know I'm gonna rock it when I get in practice



This post was edited on 9/27/18 at 11:49 pm
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:48 pm to texridder
WAIT...Kavanaugh said "skis" meant beer?
How did you know that was the secret code? Ya got him now.
LOL....at you.
The willing stupidity on the left never ceases to amaze.
How did you know that was the secret code? Ya got him now.
LOL....at you.
The willing stupidity on the left never ceases to amaze.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 11:51 pm to ThePTExperience1969
quote:Based on conversation on this board, the following posters are lawyers supposedly:
WAIT WAIT WAIT this dumbass is a LAWYER? If thats how low the standard is nowadays, I know I'm gonna rock it when I get in practice
vor
brian wilson
texridder
kickadawgitfeelsgood
tigerdoc's wife
wild tchoupitoulas
Popular
Back to top
