- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kavanaugh hearing clips
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:45 pm
I hadn't really paid much attention to the Kavanaugh hearings, but I have watched the Sotomayor hearing and the Kavanaugh hearing and the difference is she actually answers questions that are asked.
What I noticed with Kavanaugh is he talked a lot in circles without really answering any questions.
I also believe that withholding thousands of documents without fair opportunities to review prior to a person appearing at a hearing is quite sketchy.
I'm not sure if the lady is telling the truth or not, but I do believe that the world will not end if they decided to hold off on a vote until all the facts are investigated.
What I noticed with Kavanaugh is he talked a lot in circles without really answering any questions.
I also believe that withholding thousands of documents without fair opportunities to review prior to a person appearing at a hearing is quite sketchy.
I'm not sure if the lady is telling the truth or not, but I do believe that the world will not end if they decided to hold off on a vote until all the facts are investigated.
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 2:51 pm
24
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:46 pm to LaTexSaint
Kamela had some GREAT questions.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:46 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
the difference is she actually answers questions that are ask.
#defundsouthern
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:46 pm to LaTexSaint
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:47 pm to LaTexSaint
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:47 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
I also believe that withholding thousands of documents without fair opportunities to review prior to a person appearing at a hearing is quite sketchy.
Have you any idea what those documents ARE?
Do you think that his actual court decisions are being hidden?
Do you believe a single DEM is "uncertain" of how he / she may vote?
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:47 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
Posted by Message
LaTexSaint
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:51 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
I hadn't really paid much attention to the Kavanaugh hearings
You should have - you would have seen a tour de force in jurisprudent excellence and constitutional knowledge.
Sotomeyer was a disgrace - a 'wise latina' she may be, but she is just another left wing activist.
What you saw with Sotomeyer, was the GOP treating the nominee with respect and asking relevant questions.
In the Kavanaugh hearing there was not one relevant question asked by the DEMs. not one. Nothing but circus.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:51 pm to LaTexSaint
Nice job. Very calm. But you say Jack sh!t about holding this charge for weeks.
Handed to the FBI?
You say nothing.
Few facts and no date so Kav cannot deny with a ironclad alibi.
You say nothing.
Well done sir but your full of it.
Handed to the FBI?
You say nothing.
Few facts and no date so Kav cannot deny with a ironclad alibi.
You say nothing.
Well done sir but your full of it.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:52 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
What I noticed with Kavanaugh is he talked a lot in circles without really answering any questions.
lol at you analyzing responses from one of the brightest jurists in the country.
quote:
I also believe that withholding thousands of documents without fair opportunities to review prior to a person appearing at a hearing is quite sketchy.
Why? What do you think is contained in such documents?
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 9/18/18 at 2:59 pm to LaTexSaint
This smells like a fox mulder alter with a twist... he’s actually using decent grammar this time.
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:00 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
I'm not sure if the lady is telling the truth or not
Somebody told me two months ago that she was an inveterate liar. That she was a high school slut who got plastered every weekend and ran a train on any group that wanted to come over. They said she would always wake up the next day not knowing where she was, or what she had been doing and made up silly stories about 'getting raped' to account for all the man-juice dripping from her every orifice.
That's what the guy told me and I have no reason not be believe him.
Well, I think it was a guy = could have been a girl.
And it may have been a couple of days ago, not months, or maybe it was last year, maybe before the election, maybe Obama's election,
And maybe she was not tat much of a whore - maybe she just bang really rich boys. Or maybe she was a lesbian, it;s sort of vague in my mind at the moment.
But I do know I was extremely upset about it and haven't been able to sleep well since. I even went to the shrink a couple years ago - or maybe last week - and he told me I was definitely damaged by the experience - or maybe I was just upset about the NFL kneeling for the anthem.
Anyway, I know not to believe that woman - and you have no right to question my opinion.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:01 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
Sotomayor hearing and the Kavanaugh hearing and the difference is she actually answers questions that are asked.
Well, she is a wise Latina.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:01 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
Have you any idea what those documents ARE?
Do you think that his actual court decisions are being hidden?
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:02 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
Have you any idea what those documents ARE?
Some are said to have his candid opinion on Abortion and Affirmative action (He was not specific when asked about it), but there is a reason why they have not been fully released. Based on past nominees, most have 90% of their documents available, he only had 7%.
quote:
Do you think that his actual court decisions are being hidden?
No, they are supposed to be public information, I think!
quote:
Do you believe a single DEM is "uncertain" of how he / she may vote?
No. I believe based on how this process has gone, the fact that Republicans refused to even have a hearing for Merrick Garland for 8 months, then month 2 of the Trump administration they all of a sudden ready to go vote didn't sit well.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:04 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
Based on past nominees, most have 90% of their documents available, he only had 7%.
Are you sure? I heard it was 7.2%. quote:
No, they are supposed to be public information, I think!
You're fun. Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:04 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
most have 90% of their documents available, he only had 7%.
#closesouthern
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:05 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
she actually answers questions that are asked.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:06 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
facts are investigated
What fricking facts? There are no fricking facts.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:08 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
What you saw with Sotomeyer, was the GOP treating the nominee with respect and asking relevant questions.
I think with the idea that Trump has asked people to be loyal to him, begs the question of why has this guys name all of a sudden appeared on the list.
His name was not on the original, but the more he became outspoken about whether a sitting president can pardon himself....voila....he's made the list that quick....
The Democrats did not withhold documents from the Republicans, nor did they try to rush a vote like the Republicans are doing now.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News