- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/13/18 at 5:14 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:Beginning with no hands-on examination of the "hacked" DNC server. Sorry, that is a nonstarter for me.
Pretty interesting stuff if true. Some really good interwebs forensics by Team USA.
Posted on 7/14/18 at 4:02 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:quote:
You know the clowns have software that could make it look like your Aunt Ethyl hacked their servers right?
Holy frick, I would pay to watch you try to explain how you think that works.
Dude, at least try to keep up
quote:
A new release of CIA documents by Wikileaks indicates that the intelligence agency has the means and the intent to mask the cyber-attacks it commits by making them seem as if they originated from a foreign power. -- Mar. 7, 2017
Posted on 7/14/18 at 11:45 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Wikileaks
This is really all you have?
Please, fricking explain that. I've seen you post it at least twice now. Let's hear it...
Posted on 7/14/18 at 11:49 pm to RobbBobb
quote:Does it also spit out names, dates, whereabouts, specific computer server details, etc of Russian GRU agents, too?
A new release of CIA documents by Wikileaks indicates that the intelligence agency has the means and the intent to mask the cyber-attacks it commits by making them seem as if they originated from a foreign power. -- Mar. 7, 2017
That's some badass means. I'm even more impressed now by our deep state fake intel.
Posted on 7/14/18 at 11:57 pm to JuiceTerry
Juiceterry, I was reading the election 2016 board for shits and giggles last night and noticed you were on there looking pretty happy about the results.
Are you still in favor of DJT winning again in 2020?
Are you still in favor of DJT winning again in 2020?
Posted on 7/15/18 at 12:04 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
I called his victory dead on, weeks before election day. Made money on him that night. Yes, he'll win in 2020, probably by a much bigger margin.
Posted on 7/15/18 at 12:17 am to JuiceTerry
quote:COLLUSION!
I called his victory dead on, weeks before election day.
Posted on 7/15/18 at 12:26 am to LSUTigerFan247
This never gets old
quote:
Posted on 7/15/18 at 12:29 am to JuiceTerry
quote:what did you see that the media/political punditry experts didn't see?
I called his victory dead on, weeks before election day.
quote:Considering his chances of facing a candidate as disliked as hillary are much smaller, what makes you believe this?
Yes, he'll win in 2020, probably by a much bigger margin.
Posted on 7/15/18 at 12:37 am to JoBoo
quote:
Dude is toxic and you morons are too stupid to see it.
Oh, this is good.
Posted on 7/15/18 at 12:41 am to Wolfhound45
LINK /
They indicted 12 members of the Russian military.
1) No one from the Russian military would hack the DNC and leave tracks leading to themselves. They would leave tracks leading to someone else.
2) RR did not reveal who did the forensics on the DNC server.
3) The DNC has not allowed any gov't agency to touch their server.
4) Once the DNC thought their server had been "hacked", they refused to let the F bee I search it.
5) After almost 2 years the DNC finally lets someone inspect their server and it leads to the Russian military? No way anyone should believe this. After 2 years a good forensics team could put enough tracks on the server to make it look like anyone "hacked" it.
6) Their biggest problem is that the transfer rate of "hacked" data was transferred faster than the transfer rate any internet service provider in the US provides.
7) The "hacked" data was transferred at similar speed a thumb drive downloads data.
quote:
Did the Russians release true information from the DNC e-mails?
They indicted 12 members of the Russian military.
1) No one from the Russian military would hack the DNC and leave tracks leading to themselves. They would leave tracks leading to someone else.
2) RR did not reveal who did the forensics on the DNC server.
3) The DNC has not allowed any gov't agency to touch their server.
4) Once the DNC thought their server had been "hacked", they refused to let the F bee I search it.
5) After almost 2 years the DNC finally lets someone inspect their server and it leads to the Russian military? No way anyone should believe this. After 2 years a good forensics team could put enough tracks on the server to make it look like anyone "hacked" it.
6) Their biggest problem is that the transfer rate of "hacked" data was transferred faster than the transfer rate any internet service provider in the US provides.
7) The "hacked" data was transferred at similar speed a thumb drive downloads data.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:39 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Please, fricking explain that. I've seen you post it at least twice now. Let's hear it...
How clueless are you? Wiki published the internal CIA files that discussed the use of these programs
The project is called UMBRAGE. It works by getting around the problem of hacking techniques. Any cyber attack inevitably leaves a trace of how it was done; but UMBRAGE has cataloged other hackers' tricks, and thusly traces would look like they come from someone else entirely.
quote:
"The CIA's Remote Devices Branch's UMBRAGE group collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques 'stolen' from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation. With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the "fingerprints" of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from."
The UMBRAGE allows data to be deleted, webcams to be spied on and the ability leave a trail pointing to previously identified hacking techniques of foreign powers.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 1:15 am to Wolfhound45
Putin told Fox News show that all of the hacked, released emails were not altered. They were just as the Dems wrote them.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 2:18 am to bamarep
quote:
You know the clowns have software that could make it look like your Aunt Ethyl hacked their servers right?
Please tell me you know that.
And why would that be your first thought? Occam's Razor and you are so far apart.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 7:35 am to Bard
quote:
How can they be thorough if they have never been allowed to inspect the DNC's servers to verify the data?
THIS is the key to never getting a conviction for the hacking.
Habeas corpus. No crime without the actual server in evidence. And now, without a chain of evidence over the YEARS, the server is inadmissible as the evidence cannot be deemed "pure", untainted, undoctored.
Motion to dismiss as there is no evidence of a crime.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 7:40 am to matthew25
So did Podesta, whose emails were hacked (phished because he’s a fricking idiot), as well as Donna brazile
Posted on 7/19/18 at 7:41 am to Sidicous
Also, the investigation of the server was performed by a democratic-linked company (Crowdstrike). Let’s ignore that though.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News