- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Just read the 29 page indictment on CNN...
Posted on 7/13/18 at 2:31 pm to JuiceTerry
Posted on 7/13/18 at 2:31 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Why don't you at least take 5 minutes and read the indictment?
It says they used a variety of means to hack the "system." This is all done by a 3rd party and sent to the fed govt. I don't believe any of it, since they were hired by the DNC to do the investigation.
0
Posted on 7/13/18 at 2:34 pm to Wolfhound45
Wolfhound45:
Always welcomed.
asurob1
Again, always welcomed, but I actually agree with you here.
quote:
Just my thoughts.
Always welcomed.
asurob1
quote:
Honestly it doesn't matter.
It's just another political talking point (this time for the dems).
Trump probably regrets calling for the russians to hack Hillary, but outside of that there really isn't much of an interesting story here.
Again, always welcomed, but I actually agree with you here.
Posted on 7/13/18 at 2:35 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Pretty interesting stuff if true. Some really good interwebs forensics by Team USA. It is fairly thorough and I am personally inclined to believe it (sorry Seth Rich). But in the end, so what? Did the Russians release true information from the DNC e-mails? Then maybe (just maybe) you should not do the things you do or say the things you say.
My thoughts are how did they reach that conclusion without the SEVER to inspect?
Posted on 7/13/18 at 3:08 pm to Jjdoc
quote:”They” had the conclusion written out before they even started an investigation.
My thoughts are how did they reach that conclusion without the SEVER to inspect?
Posted on 7/13/18 at 3:24 pm to Wolfhound45
I'll try to read it tonight but do they address the 22.7 mb/sec download speed shown in the metadata of the Guccifer 2.0 release? The "muh Russia" pushers just continually ignore the one known fact that we have. And that fact takes a big, steaming shite on their narrative.
Posted on 7/13/18 at 3:26 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Some really good interwebs forensics by Team USA. It is fairly thorough and I am personally inclined to believe it (sorry Seth Rich)
Yeah,
I'll just leave this right here quote:
A new release of CIA documents by Wikileaks indicates that the intelligence agency has the means and the intent to mask the cyber-attacks it commits by making them seem as if they originated from a foreign power. -- Mar. 7, 2017
Posted on 7/13/18 at 3:40 pm to shinerfan
quote:Except it doesn't at all
do they address the 22.7 mb/sec download speed shown in the metadata of the Guccifer 2.0 release? The "muh Russia" pushers just continually ignore the one known fact that we have. And that fact takes a big, steaming shite on their narrative.
You're assuming the metadata was from the original hack when it most likely was not
And plenty of Russian military outfits would probably be able to use those speeds anyway
Posted on 7/13/18 at 3:48 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
You're assuming the metadata was from the original hack when it most likely was not
You're aware this can be dated?
quote:
And plenty of Russian military outfits would probably be able to use those speeds anyway
Sure. If they're inside the building.
Posted on 7/13/18 at 3:54 pm to shinerfan
quote:Yep. I'm also aware that the date you're thinking about was months after the suspected hack.
You're aware this can be dated?
Posted on 7/13/18 at 4:00 pm to AUbused
quote:
And there it is folks. The way you make it where an entity can never prove anything to you by just claiming they can fake anything they want to.
“We can’t give you the info you’re asking for, it’s classified/part of an ongoing investigation.”
Checkmate.
Posted on 7/13/18 at 4:02 pm to bamarep
quote:
You know the clowns have software that could make it look like your Aunt Ethyl hacked their servers right?
Holy frick, I would pay to watch you try to explain how you think that works.
Posted on 7/13/18 at 4:12 pm to JuiceTerry
Posted on 7/13/18 at 4:18 pm to Wolfhound45
I read this as if CNN got indicted.
I am disappointed
I am disappointed
Posted on 7/13/18 at 4:31 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
These indictments rule out the clowns and Aunt Ethyl
They are thorough and specific
How can they be thorough if they have never been allowed to inspect the DNC's servers to verify the data?
Posted on 7/13/18 at 4:31 pm to shinerfan
Posted on 7/13/18 at 4:53 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
why-the-latest-theory-about-the-dnc-not-being-a-hack-is-probably-wrong
They mean "might be wrong" and they are showing how desperate they are IMO. They listed a few general guesses that download speed could be achieved while still tying it to the Russians. Should probably hire some more special investigators with blind hatred for Trump but remain "unbiased".
Posted on 7/13/18 at 4:55 pm to Mr. Wayne
You're probably right, which is why there haven't been any indictments in the case or anything.
Posted on 7/13/18 at 4:59 pm to beaverfever
What’s good for America is bad for trumpers.. crazy how far the repubs have fallen. Dude is toxic and you morons are too stupid to see it.
Posted on 7/13/18 at 5:00 pm to JuiceTerry
Where can I send my thanks to Putin? They stopped a murder from getting in office.
Posted on 7/13/18 at 5:03 pm to bamarep
quote:
Tell me how they are thorough when the dnc refused to allow the FBI to look at their servers?
You having trouble staying on topic?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News