- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:41 am to RebelExpress38
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:41 am to RebelExpress38
Such bullshite
0
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:53 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
She is a doctor specializing in,
might as well be abortion
what she is doing to her own kid is worse than killing
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:01 am to RebelExpress38
I'm just going to say it. Someone needs to off that kids mom.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:02 am to RebelExpress38
Democrats are absolutely indefensible. How anyone runs interference for them is mind boggling.
I hope things work out for this father.
I hope things work out for this father.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:19 am to RebelExpress38
The fact that most men in this thread agree that protecting the child against his own mother may include the extermination of that threat gives me hope that we may not be completely lost.
But she needs to be expelled. And quickly before irreversible damage is done.
But she needs to be expelled. And quickly before irreversible damage is done.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:24 am to AggieHank86
quote:
And how do you plan to prevent a divorce when the other spouse wants one in a no-fault state?
I really don’t know. Hopefully the judge takes into consideration that the dad didn’t want the divorce when awarding custody. I guess I’m just talking to the guys who agree to willingly down the path towards divorce instead of doing what it requires to keep a family together.
To your point though, Texas is a not a no-fault state.
I did read that 80% of divorces are initiated by women and that part of the reason they do better in a divorce is because they have a head start.
And Now I have “no fault divorce states” in my browser history. If my wife sees this it will be a pretty awkward situation. Thanks a lot Hank!
This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 6:34 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:24 am to weeev
Or go back to a democratic republic WITHOUT universal suffrage.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:25 am to DrunkerThanThou
quote:
She’s a pediatrician which is horrifying. Her license should be taken away
The Texas Medical Board is a very activist board. I'm thinking that a series of complaints to them may be an effective way forward. And yes, I am a physician.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:26 am to RebelExpress38
Shoot the jurors
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:42 am to kengel2
quote:
If this dude murders his wife would anyone be surprised?
Yes, I would. People have to have more control over themselves than to give into their basest emotional selves. I’m shocked at the number of upvotes this comment received.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:44 am to RebelExpress38
quote:
James’ mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, will be able to continue “transitioning” him into “Luna,”
How is this not child abuse?
This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 6:46 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:01 am to Robin Masters
quote:Obviously, that is a question of definitions… but you are mistaken.quote:To your point though, Texas is a not a no-fault state.
And how do you plan to prevent a divorce when the other spouse wants one in a no-fault state?
A “no fault” divorce simply means that the party seeking the divorce need not establish fault or wrongdoing on the part of the other party in order to obtain a divorce. In every state in this country, a person who wants to be divorced, will be divorced.
The assets may get divided on something other than an equal basis or perhaps the child conservatorship and possession might vary, but the divorce will be provided.
in Texas, for instance, “fault in the break up of the marriage“ is one of several factors considered in deciding how to divide the marital assets.
quote:I suspect that you read this in a blog posted by a disillusioned ex-husband whose wife left him.
I did read that 80% of divorces are initiated by women and that part of the reason they do better in a divorce is because they have a head start.
I certainly cannot speak to other states, but I have never come across one single, solitary Texas judge who particularly cared which party was the Petitioner and which party was the Respondent.
This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 7:11 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:09 am to RebelExpress38
quote:
The father noted that, in his opinion, he witnessed that his wife “was only giving [James] love and affection when he was acting like a girl.” She used to lock James in his room and tell him monsters only eat boys, Younger added.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:10 am to CollegeFBRules
quote:If you were surprised by that response on this forum, I submit that you don’t pay very close attention.quote:Yes, I would. People have to have more control over themselves than to give into their basest emotional selves. I’m shocked at the number of upvotes this comment received.
If this dude murders his wife would anyone be surprised?
80 to 90% of the responses on similar issues are university comprised of knee-jerk, emotional reaction.
I personally believe that this is far too young in age for the sort of transition that is under discussion (even in the most clear-cut cases of transgenderism). See Dr. Debra Soh. And obviously none of us were present to hear the testimony at trial.
Nonetheless, it is safe to infer that each side presented extensive medical and psychological evidence. The net result of that evidence is that a trial judge and 11 of 12 jurors all agreed on the result. That near-unanimity is a decent indicator that the scientific evidence was fairly strong.
This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 7:58 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:13 am to blueboy
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:14 am to AggieHank86
quote:
80 to 90% of the responses on any issues are universally comprised of knee-jerk, emotional reaction.
FIFY
Welcome to the internet. Are you new here?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:26 am to AggieHank86
quote:
If you were surprised by that response on this forum, I submit that you don’t pay very close attention.
I’ve paid extremely close attention over the years, it’s why I stopped posting on this board.
quote:
I personally believe that this is far too young in age for the sort of transition that is under discussion
Of course it’s too young. No child of such age can make a decision such as this, and I find the harm adults pour into the brains of kids at these ages forcing these decisions are the real culprit in all of this.
That said, hate the mom for doing this, but to say one wouldn’t be surprised if he killed the woman is ridiculous.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:29 am to RebelExpress38
This is disgusting.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:34 am to CollegeFBRules
quote:
That said, hate the mom for doing this, but to say one wouldn’t be surprised if he killed the woman is ridiculous.
I am not familiar with the details of this case - and cannot conceive of any details that would make me support the announced decision.
But I can say this - there is one and only one instance where I would commit murder - torturing and disfiguring my child (or grandchild or great grandchild) in front of my eyes is about the only thing I can come up with.
Details may salve that knee-jerk response, but this smells to high heaven.
Kids this age being "chemically altered" at the whim of the mother does not compute on any level of my consciousness.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:37 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I did read that 80% of divorces are initiated by women and that part of the reason they do better in a divorce is because they have a head start.
I suspect that you read this in a blog posted by a disillusioned ex-husband whose wife left him.
I certainly cannot speak to other states, but I have never come across one single, solitary Texas judge who particularly cared which party was the Petitioner and which party was the Respondent.
I reread the article (it was from custodyzen.com) and I misspoke. It said women are awarded custody 80% of the time and attributed that possibly to the fact that women initiated the divorce most often and had a leg up on hiring attorney, etc.
LINK
I’m not trying to go point/counter point with you on divorce laws in Texas or anywhere else. There are few subjects I know less about. My main point was that this situation is yet one more symptom of the bigger issue which is the erosion of the nuclear family and an increased focus on the happiness of the parent, which in my view, should remain secondary to the rearing of the offspring.... At least until they are out of the house.
Page 8 of 45
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News