re: Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’

quote:

---

If so, explain how it would be different. Oh. And be careful. "While scant", there is literature out there supporting about any damned thing you can think of.

---

.

I would imagine that there’s some fine Muslim literature supporting clitorectomies.

quote:

---

find some language which lies somewhere between “bad decision“ and “blatant child abuse,“ and I may well agree to it.

---

Aggiehank: i know my argument is complete horseshite, can someone make it better for me?

quote:

---

I would imagine that there’s some fine Muslim literature supporting clitorectomies.

---

The amount of literature supporting adult/child sexual relationships completely dwarfs the amount of literature supporting the idea that a 7 year old trans needing to be castrated is a thing.

By hundreds of volumes.

I mean, ya know. It's "scant" for a reason.

quote:

---

Are leftist actually defending castrating a 7 year old child?

---

There are probably a few Leftists who think this is a grand idea.

I am simply asserting that parents should retain the right to make medical decisions for their child, rather than subjecting all of us to a statewide statutory regimen telling all of us which decisions the State will condescend to ALLOW us to make for our children and which ones the State will graciously make on our behalf.

quote:

---

Aggiehank: i know my argument is complete horseshite, can someone make it better for me?

---

What's funny is, while the whole chemical castration thing is bad, the REAL child abuse here is that the kid WANTS it in the first place.

The REAL child abuse came BEFORE even getting to this point.

If mom had told her son he was grotesquely fat ever day for 4 years to the point that the boy was afraid to eat and wanted a stomach staple..........NO ONE wouldn't see it for what it was.

quote:

---

quote:

---

A parent should have the right to make the decision as to whether their child is just fine with crooked teeth or whether the parent will put the child in braces.

---

It's amazing that you think this is the same as deciding if their child should undergo hormone therapy.

---

Good Lord.

Another poster specifically asked a question about orthodontic work, and I respond to that question. You then pretend that it was I who inserted orthodontic work into the discussion.

It is like clockwork.

quote:

---

I am simply asserting that parents should retain the right to make medical decisions for their child

---

While you desperately ignore how they got to the point of this "decision" in the first place.

If she'd told the child he was fat for 4 years and then, he wanted a stomach staple at age 7 even though he is NOT fat..........you would see that for the grotesque abuse it was.

You only pretend to not see it here because it damages the left. That is your ONLY reason for existence in this thread.

quote:

---

rather than subjecting all of us to a statewide statutory regimen telling all of us which decisions the State will condescend to ALLOW us to make for our children and which ones the State will graciously make on our behalf.

---

Why do you continue this dishonesty? You’re already subjected to it, yet you keep pretending that it would spring into existence the second we stopped letting crazy mothers chemically castrate their second grader.

And you call this a rational argument?

quote:

---

Hank already folded on (clitoral,circumcision) and let's be blunt here. There's ONLY one reason he did.

Because clitorectormies are considered bad by the left and are a "women's issue"

In EVERY other way, chemically castrating a 7 year old ex EXPONENTIALLY worse.

---

if you think that there exist in this entire universe only one distinction between those two procedures, you are not 1/10 as intelligent as I had originally believed you to be.