- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury Acquits the man who called for Trump’s assassination on BlueSky.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:21 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:21 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
What would the jury have done if the same thing was written about Obama?
0
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:22 am to Patato Salad
quote:
- there are daily posts here calling for executions, death, violence, etc.against various people.
Executions aren't murder. And there aren't daily calls for any of those things.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:22 am to i am dan
quote:
Wouldn't that be the same logic as someone who murdered a person. They broke the law by murdering the person, but you would seen to need to know if it was a gun or a knife that was used to form your opinion on the murder.
For this comparison to work, I'd be asking for a body to prove someone had been murdered, not what weapon was used (that would be more comparable to how was it written--in a letter, on Twitter, etc.)
This isn't hard.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:25 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Historically Consistent. Just like Dems utilized jury nullification to enforce terrorizing blacks, Jews and Republicans in the post-Civil War South.
Dems gonna Dem.
Dems gonna Dem.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:26 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I wonder how the John Hinkley assassination attempt of Reagan would go down today. Hinkley was basically adjudicated through a lightly used loophole that allowed the trial court to determine culpability under an insanity defense.
The far left liberals got a technical "acquittal" under the law and Reagan supporters got him locked up indefinitely in a mental hospital under onerous oversight terms. It was a compromise that avoided the potential embarrassment of a DC jury (which hated Reagan) turning him loose as a political statement.
But that loophole has dramatically closed or at least tightened. Today, Hinkley would likely go to trial on the merits and 12 raging liberals would be sitting in the jury box.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:38 am to Azkiger
quote:
So you can form an opinion without knowing what he wrote? How does that work?
This is judge is located in Alexandria, Virginia. I once lived there. I know who makes up juries in Alexandria, Virginia. And I know damn well that if this had been done against Barry Insane Odumbf*ck it would’ve been a completely different result.
It’s called common fricking sense which apparently you are severely lacking in.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:39 am to Azkiger
quote:
For this comparison to work, I'd be asking for a body to prove someone had been murdered, not what weapon was used (that would be more comparable to how was it written--in a letter, on Twitter, etc.)
This isn't hard.
No, it isn't hard, and you're still wrong...
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:41 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:40 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is why we need not get our hopes up for justice being served on any of these swamp indictments. This country needs a divorce.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:46 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Not holding people accountable has worked out well for DEMs. And it’s led to the killing of innocent people. F THEM!
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:50 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:47 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Hopefully he had to spend a lot on a legal defense.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:52 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Juries can do that. Maybe they found it wasn’t a real threat. Who knows. Juries do what juries do.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:56 am to shinerfan
Are you saying that calling for the execution of someone is free speech, but what the defendant posted is a criminal offense? If so, would appreciate if you could distinguish how those two things are different.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:00 am to Patato Salad
quote:
Are you saying that calling for the execution of someone is free speech, but what the defendant posted is a criminal offense? If so, would appreciate if you could distinguish how those two things are different.
Seriously? One is a crime. One is the consequence of a crime. That is an unbelievably stupid question and shows both your lack of intelligence and your lack of any shred of morality. Your parents must have been utter trash.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:15 am to MMauler
quote:
This is judge is located in Alexandria, Virginia. I once lived there. I know who makes up juries in Alexandria, Virginia. And I know damn well that if this had been done against Barry Insane Odumbf*ck it would’ve been a completely different result.
It’s called common fricking sense which apparently you are severely lacking in.
"Alexandria, Virginia's political bias is common sense!"
Keep flailing about.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:16 am to i am dan
quote:
No, it isn't hard, and you're still wrong...
Nuh-huh.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:20 am to Azkiger
quote:
Nuh-huh.
DAMMIT, I got no comeback for that one....
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:25 am to shinerfan
Wow - I didn't think you'd get so triggered. Yes - I realize one is a crime and another is a sentence. Your response is disingenuous and overlooks the orignal point - people online (including here) call for people (who have not been convicted of crimes) to be executed, harmed, etc. - how is that different than the defendant's conduct?
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 11:34 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:28 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I'm sure the verdict would've been the same if Obama had been on the receiving end of these threats instead of Trump.
NOT
NOT
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:33 am to Azkiger
quote:
Alexandria, Virginia's political bias is common sense!"
Have you ever lived there? Hell, have you ever been there?
It’s a fricking extremely expensive democrat hellhole.
Are you really so fricking stupid that you actually believe that had someone been tried in Alexandria for typing those same words online about your dear cult leader Obama that an Alexandria Virginia jury wouldn’t have convicted him/jer in a heartbeat?
Please tell me you’re not that fricking stupid.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 12:17 pm to MMauler
quote:
Have you ever lived there? Hell, have you ever been there?
Most people haven't, therefore it's not "common sense".
Christ, you're really losing it because I asked what the dude said?
You're mental. And an idiot.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News