- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:11 pm to beerJeep
quote:
You really are fricking retarded. I said we didn’t need to continue the firebombing campaign because we now had nuclear bombs which drastically reduced the risk to American airmen.
Again, buddy, answer the question. Did the firebombing campaign succeed in its stated objectives. Yes or no.
quote:
Oh noooo! Not one city!
Another pretty good example of you missing the forest for the trees
quote:.
Not if we fight with a hand behind our back
Yeah bud, I don't think we are going to change our approach based on the meandering thoughts of a dude who casually mentions we should mimic our approach to Japan in 1944-45. That is just an incredibly funny reference to make for this situation and you won't ever understand why.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:11 pm to LSUBALLER
He’s for Iran, that’s what you guys don’t seem to grasp. Once you know this his arguments make perfect sense.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:12 pm to Madking
Nah, you are just a regular liar. It's all good though. You can join the other cadre of retards who moan out my name for all I care. You strike me as a dude who is familiar with moaning out another man's name too.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:13 pm to Madking
Mental health issues. 
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:15 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Again, buddy, answer the question. Did the firebombing campaign succeed in its stated objectives. Yes or no.
Again.
We didn’t need to continue the firebombing campaign because a new weapon came in that meant we could massively reduce the threat to allied airmen
Had we not had the bomb, firebombing would have continued until Japan cried uncle
quote:
Another pretty good example of you missing the forest for the trees
Not at all. We didn’t firebomb Tokyo because that was the seat of the emperor and we felt that the emperor was the key to rebuilding as the imperial army and navy were seen as the real driving force behind the war.
quote:
Yeah bud, I don't think we are going to change our approach based on the meandering thoughts of a dude who casually mentions we should mimic our approach to Japan in 1944-45. That is just an incredibly funny reference to make for this situation and you won't ever understand why.
Because emotional rats like you cower at the thought of doing what is necessary to win.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:16 pm to Powerman
quote:
This Iran conflict is more consequential than most people want to admit.
But not for the reasons you Leftoids imagine. You would think after years of trying to predict Trump and getting completely embarrassed by reality you'd have given up by now but no, TDS is terminal brain-rot for you.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:17 pm to crazy4lsu
Continue proving my point of you like but it’s already been confirmed.
This post was edited on 4/11/26 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:18 pm to LSUBALLER
It’s the mental health crisis of our species.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:22 pm to beerJeep
quote:
We didn’t need to continue the firebombing campaign because a new weapon came in that meant we could massively reduce the threat to allied airmen
Again, did the firebombing campaign produce the desired results? Hint: Look at the Japanese reactions dummy.
quote:
Not at all. We didn’t firebomb Tokyo because that was the seat of the emperor and we felt that the emperor was the key to rebuilding as the imperial army and navy were seen as the real driving force behind the war.
Oh, this sounds like some leftist speak. Muh hand's behind our back!
quote:
Because emotional rats like you cower at the thought of doing what is necessary to win.
Dummy, do you think I'm in charge of anything? Maybe you do and that's why you think we can magically produce the amount of materiel we used in our efforts against Japan in 1944-45.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:23 pm to Madking
Sure thing bud.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:24 pm to Clames
quote:
But not for the reasons you Leftoids imagine. You would think after years of trying to predict Trump and getting completely embarrassed by reality you'd have given up by now but no, TDS is terminal brain-rot for you.
If I had nothing to say I'd probably cling to cheap slogans like TDS as well.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:26 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Again, did the firebombing campaign produce the desired results? Hint: Look at the Japanese reactions dummy.
Again. We didn’t need to continue it because of the bomb
Ask again. I’ll respond the same
quote:
Oh, this sounds like some leftist speak. Muh hand's behind our back!
Nope. Strategic decision. They weren’t scared of the fallout of doing so.
quote:
Dummy, do you think I'm in charge of anything? Maybe you do and that's why you think we can magically produce the amount of materiel we used in our efforts against Japan in 1944-45.
You aren’t even in charge of your emotions, zero chance you would be placed in any form of position of power.
We absolutely could ramp up production domestically like we did in WWII.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:30 pm to Madking
quote:
Continue proving my point of you like but it’s already been confirmed.
I don't recall you ever having a point about anything. You're a cartoon character
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:37 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Again. We didn’t need to continue it because of the bomb
Ask again. I’ll respond the same
Yes, your intellectual cowardice is noted.
quote:
Nope. Strategic decision. They weren’t scared of the fallout of doing so.
Muh hands. Strategic decisions should be based only on causing massive death and destruction and not for a specific purpose.
quote:
You aren’t even in charge of your emotions, zero chance you would be placed in any form of position of power.
Lol, buddy.
quote:
We absolutely could ramp up production domestically like we did in WWII.
Over the course of several years, yes. It isn't really an immediate answer to the crisis at hand. And despite you not asking, the state of American shipbuilding is pitiful. Labor shortages, outdated infrastructure, and apparently shipyard space. The Trump administration did do an EO and the report produced, called the Maritime Action Plan, suggests that we have some serious issues that need to be rectified. The labor shortage is the limiting factor and while the plan does discuss new training programs, it also suggests some interesting measures to stabilize that workforce.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:44 pm to Powerman
Projection and dishonesty like I said
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:45 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Yes, your intellectual cowardice is noted.
By continuing to answer your question? I’m sorry your reading comprehension is arse
quote:
Muh hands. Strategic decisions should be based only on causing massive death and destruction and not for a specific purpose.
Not doing something because you are scared of what others will think and not doing something for strategic reasons are not the same, but I understand why a low brow emotional rat like yourself would think so.
quote:
The labor shortage is the limiting factor
A true wartime economy would see this fixed quickly. As will the increasing use of automation and robots.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:49 pm to Powerman
quote:
No one wants to admit the truth. Iran has a lot of leverage here.
They're the ultimate chaos agent
All the more reason to obliterate them.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:56 pm to beerJeep
quote:
By continuing to answer your question? I’m sorry your reading comprehension is arse
Yeah bud, they surely were going to continue firebombing if not for the atomic bomb. Of course, why would they need the bomb if firebombing was producing the intended effect?
quote:
Not doing something because you are scared of what others will think and not doing something for strategic reasons are not the same, but I understand why a low brow emotional rat like yourself would think so.
Oh wow, so you can see that occasionally it is in your own strategic interest to not lay wanton death and destruction.
quote:
A true wartime economy would see this fixed quickly. As will the increasing use of automation and robots.
Yeah again, the report, produced by the Trump Administration, does not paint a very optimistic picture. If we eventually outsource shipbuilding to Korea and Japan, as has been floated as a possible idea, will be proof enough.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 3:02 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Yeah bud, they surely were going to continue firebombing if not for the atomic bomb.
Correct. Not sure why you think differently
quote:
Of course, why would they need the bomb if firebombing was producing the intended effect?
For the… what… 5th time? Because now with ONE plane they can do what they needed HUNDREDS of planes to do. Thus limiting the threat to allied airmen.
Jesus.
fricking.
Christ.
Also…. The bomb was kind of a little secret that the planners of the firebombing raids were not made aware of until the bomb was ready to go……
quote:
Oh wow, so you can see that occasionally it is in your own strategic interest to not lay wanton death and destruction.
Yep. Doing so for strategic reasons is one thing. Doing so because “muh war crimes” or “think of the children!” Is another. I’m shocked you can’t figure that out… oh wait. No I’m not. You’re retarded.
quote:
Yeah again, the report, produced by the Trump Administration, does not paint a very optimistic picture. If we eventually outsource shipbuilding to Korea and Japan, as has been floated as a possible idea, will be proof enough.
Kinda like the reports pre wwii and pre war mobilization?
Weird how things can radically change when men are in charge to do what is necessary.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News