- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judges must be held accountable for their decisions on the bench
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:05 pm to ELVIS U
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:05 pm to ELVIS U
Since my previous post apparently offended someone's sensibilities, let's try this . . .
Boards and disciplinary panels are not accountability. For the principle of accountability in this case, see below.
"But if the ox has been accustomed to gore in the past, and its owner has been warned but has not kept it in, and it kills a man or a woman, the ox shall be stoned, and its owner also shall be put to death." Exodus 21:29
quote:
There are ways to hold them accountable (appeals, disciplinary boards, etc) if you want to hold them accountable.
Boards and disciplinary panels are not accountability. For the principle of accountability in this case, see below.
"But if the ox has been accustomed to gore in the past, and its owner has been warned but has not kept it in, and it kills a man or a woman, the ox shall be stoned, and its owner also shall be put to death." Exodus 21:29
0
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:06 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Well, those damned judges should just keep EVERYONE in jail pre-trial. Screw the Constitution
In most cases, yes.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:12 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Well, those damned judges should just keep EVERYONE in jail pre-trial. Screw the Constitution.
The left are very different than we are.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:17 pm to hogcard1964
quote:And here we see a near perfect exemplar of the difference between a constitutional conservative and a mindless populist.
Well, those damned judges should just keep EVERYONE in jail pre-trial. Screw the Constitutionquote:
In most cases, yes.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:18 pm to L.A.
Gotta start arresting and imprisoning some for accessory to negligent homicide, etc
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:41 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Well, those darned judges should just keep EVERYONE in jail pre-trial. Forget the Constitution.
Sorry. I had to remove the profanity from your quote before I responded. I understand your frustration, but we are hopefully moving into a time when the Constitution actually protects those who deserve protecting and allows society to inflict swift and righteous punishment on those who dont deserve the same.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:43 pm to L.A.
Eventually we will get to a point when people snap over these repeat offenders and start to go after judges
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:47 pm to Big4SALTbro
quote:
Eventually we will get to a point when people snap over these repeat offenders and start to go after judges
This is just something people say to try to feel better about the future. The truth is most of our society isn’t motivated enough to get involved when it’s their own loved ones much less strangers.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 6:26 pm to BrodyDad
quote:I don't see "screw" as being particularly profane, but I respect your decision to edit.
Sorry. I had to remove the profanity from your quote before I responded.
quote:Here is where we differ.
we are hopefully moving into a time when the Constitution actually protects those who deserve protecting and allows society to inflict swift and righteous punishment on those who dont deserve the same.
The Bill of Rights is designed to place limits on governmental action ... vis-a-vis EVERYONE, not just those that you deem to be "deserving" of those limitations.
Just as an example, if we decide that the First Amendment does not prevent the government from jailing those who do not "deserve" to speak freely ... how long will it be before someone decides that YOU do not "deserve" to speak freely?
Don your thinking cap and get back to me.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 6:40 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Just as an example, if we decide that the First Amendment does not prevent the government from jailing those who do not "deserve" to speak freely ... how long will it be before someone decides that YOU do not "deserve" to speak freely?
Don your thinking cap and get back to me.
I understand what you are saying and that is very true in the current system. However, I am hoping and praying that we are on the cusp of moving away from outdated ideas of equality and equity in government.
Constitutional protections like the Bill of Rights only work when they protect the Godly and righteous. When even those who reject and mock God by words or deeds have protection, it hastens the downfall of society.
Those who follow and uphold a Biblical worldview are those who should both govern and enjoy the protection of the law. All are welcome to join, but first they must repent and come to heel.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 6:44 pm to BrodyDad
quote:So, full-on thecracy.
I am hoping and praying that we are on the cusp of moving away from outdated ideas of equality and equity in government.
Constitutional protections like the Bill of Rights only work when they protect the Godly and righteous. When even those who reject and mock God by words or deeds have protection, it hastens the downfall of society.
Those who follow and uphold a Biblical worldview are those who should both govern and enjoy the protection of the law. All are welcome to join, but first they must repent and come to heel.
Damn, I hope yours is a satire account.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 6:57 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
So, full-on thecracy.
I hope yours is a satire account
No...not theocracy. The appropriate word is Theonomy.
If you are interested, somehow I doubt it, I would recommend Institutes of Biblical Law by R.J.Rushdoony.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:25 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
So, full-on thecracy.
It's always full-on theocracy. Just depends on which theocracy is given ascendancy.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:39 pm to L.A.
It is the only way things will ever get truly better. It is absurd what these liberal judges have been doing, with zero fear of retribution. It is disgusting. I don't have the answer to fix it, but it needs to be a major focus....and I believe the Supreme Court should get involved in some of these ridiculous sentences (or non sentences). Give a very loud warning, and then punish a few to the extent of the law. That is the only thing that will ever stop them.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 9:58 pm to BrodyDad
quote:Read a couple of quick articles. Interesting perspective, but sounds like an awful system.quote:No...not theocracy. The appropriate word is Theonomy.
So, full-on thecracy.
I hope yours is a satire account
If you are interested, somehow I doubt it, I would recommend Institutes of Biblical Law by R.J.Rushdoony.
I'll just stick with the US Constitution.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:47 am to L.A.
All have something in common other than multiple arrests.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:49 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Well, those damned judges should just keep EVERYONE in jail pre-trial. Screw the Constitution.
After the 10th or so arrests with some involving violence? Yea… I think it’s time then to begin considering it.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:51 am to RelentlessAnalysis
Never change Hank
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:25 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
The Bill of Rights is designed to place limits on governmental action ... vis-a-vis EVERYONE, not just those that you deem to be "deserving" of those limitations.
Except for that pesky one that ends in “shall not be infringed”.
quote:
Just as an example, if we decide that the First Amendment does not prevent the government from jailing those who do not "deserve" to speak freely ... how long will it be before someone decides that YOU do not "deserve" to speak freely?
I believe that precedent was set when the Obama administration imprisoned a YouTube creator over Hillary’s Benghazi fiasco. Following which, Obama said in an address to the UN, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
Then we have the Biden Admin confirmed to have directed social media companies to regulate speech. Especially concerning the “covid 19 conspiracies” such as blaming the Wuhan lab for the pandemic and how ineffective masks, 6ft distancing, and the Covid 19 “vaccine” were.
And interestingly enough…. This had full backing of the media, the judicial branch, and pretty much all the people now incredibly worried about constitutional erosion.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 7:26 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:38 am to Hoops
quote:
The truth is most of our society isn’t motivated enough to get involved when it’s their own loved ones much less strangers
It's a sad reality I agree. Look at the Taiwan stabber. He went on a rampage and people were just watching.
Hell, the Bondi beach shooter was confronted by an Arab, not even a local from the beach area.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News