- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:18 am to TigerDoc
Look at all of that Russian collusion and campaign-related criminal activity!!!!!!!
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:19 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Judge
Just informational stuff here.
quote:
Amy Berman Jackson
On June 17, 2010, President Obama nominated Jackson to fill a vacant seat on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that was created by the transition to senior status in 2007 by Judge Gladys Kessler.[4] Her nomination lapsed at the end of 2010, but Obama renominated her on January 5, 2011. The United States Senate confirmed Jackson in a 97-0 vote on March 17, 2011
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:25 am to MrLarson
quote:
What does going to jail have to do with being great at something?
Maybe its just me but there is a huge difference between being good and competent.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:25 am to TheHumanTornado
quote:
The best people folks.
It's hard to clear the swamp when you are restocking it with more swamp things.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:27 am to Jjdoc
So Trump's campaign manager, while waiting to be tried for crimes including but not limited to FARA violations and conspiracy against the United States, committed more crimes in attempting to influence witnesses to get him off for his previous crimes?
WITCH HUNT!
WITCH HUNT!
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:27 am to Jjdoc
And while Trump has disavowed Manafort (his hair and his skin), Huma is still flicking HRC's bean on a daily basis scot-free.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:27 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
How many directly related to the campaign? Zero
Tigerdoc, you’re a smart guy. I honestly don’t get why it is not enough for you to oppose trump on policy? Why have you gone full Louise mensch?
Don’t take this as a barb, but I hardly ever see you discuss policy in threads on here
Fair question, though I'll take exception with the Louise Mensch slander.
I don't see much good faith debate here, so I do that elsewhere.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:29 am to BamaAtl
quote:
So Trump's campaign manager
He's not Trump's campaign manager. Why do you insist on being dishonest?
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:30 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Louise Mensch slander.
Wait. You want good faith debate, but empathize with Louise Mensch? Oh Doc.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:30 am to BamaAtl
quote:
So Trump's campaign manager,
You aren't aware that the crimes he is accused of occurred while working with the Podestas?
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:32 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Wait. You want good faith debate, but empathize with Louise Mensch? Oh Doc.
I was joking about me being slandered by being compared to Mensch.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:34 am to Jjdoc
Just looking back a little. Have prior SCs gone back and tried to prosecute an associate of the investigation’s target for unrelated charges completely outside of the counsel’s scope? Manafort can hang for all I care, but I can’t recall this happening with Starr or Fitzgerald.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:35 am to BBONDS25
quote:you aren't aware Trump hired a known criminal?
You aren't aware that the crimes he is accused of occurred while working with the Podestas?
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:36 am to Byron Bojangles III
That’s pretty weak. If trump knew he was a criminal then so did everyone else he worked for. And he didn’t discriminate.
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:36 am to Byron Bojangles III
quote:He worked on multiple other campaigns for decades prior, including reagan.
you aren't aware Trump hired a known criminal?
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:39 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:You should probably review the scope of the SC for starters
ve prior SCs gone back and tried to prosecute an associate of the investigation’s target for unrelated charges completely outside of the counsel’s scope?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News