Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Judge says she doesn’t believe ‘anti-weaponization’ fund is dead; extends order blocking

Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:27 pm
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42999 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:27 pm
it.

quote:

A federal judge on Friday said she doesn’t believe President Donald Trump’s plan for a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization fund” is fully dead, and issued an order indefinitely blocking the proposal.

Judge Leonie Brinkema in the Eastern District of Virginia said she has decided to block the fund under a court order because acting Attorney General Todd Blanche or others haven’t said under oath the proposed fund was dead, that they haven’t rescinded the so-called settlement agreement between Trump and the IRS establishing the fund, and that Trump himself has suggested he still wants the fund to exist.

“When the President of the United States says” he wants something to happen, Brinkema said in court Friday morning, “that’s a pretty good indicator there will be an incentive and motive to make it happen.”

The fund could “rear its head” again in the future, the judge added, describing the prospect of US Capitol rioters getting payments as “problematic.”

In a written ruling issued later Friday, Brinkema said officials are barred “from taking any action to create or operate” the fund, as well as “reconstituting the Anti-Weaponization Fund under a different name.” She instructed the Justice Department to update her by next Friday on its compliance with her ruling.

The judge’s decisions Friday, building on a separate court hearing earlier this week in a different challenge to the fund, add fuel to the continued controversy over the program – even as the acting attorney general has said it will not move forward.

Brinkema and Judge Richard Leon in Washington, DC, both made clear in their respective hearings that they are skeptical the Trump administration is sincere in saying they no longer have a plan to pay off Trump supporters previously convicted of crimes.

Brinkema, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, is giving the Justice Department a week to decide whether it wants to submit a sworn statement from a top official stating in “unambiguous” terms that the fund is dead for good. If she receives such a promise, she said, she may decide that the case is moot.

“I do not have in this record the type of uncontestable evidence that this could not be repeated,” she told Justice Department attorney Andrew Block.

Brinkema originally blocked the fund late last month on a short-term and temporary basis as lawmakers from both parties rebelled against the proposal, eventually leading to Blanche telling a congressional committee it would not move forward.

But Trump and Blanche continue to express interest in creating some kind of mechanism to pay those they believe have been victimized by prior administrations and DOJ has not issued anything in writing reversing its earlier orders.

The Justice Department has argued the fund was dead, and any court order wasn’t needed.


https://lite.cnn.com/2026/06/12/politics/anti-weaponization-fund-ruling

They really really don't want this fund to happen.

What are they so afraid of?
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
38626 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

They really really don't want this fund to happen.



I don't either. It's a terrible idea. It's going one step beyond just trolling and sets a terrible precedent.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14005 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:34 pm to
They had no problem with Biden’s DOJ paying big money to people like Lisa Page, McCabe and Strozyk.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
14160 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

A federal judge on Friday said she doesn’t believe President Donald Trump’s plan for a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization fund” is fully dead, and issued an order indefinitely blocking the proposal.


Telling me that you’re a stage five TDS sufferer. Now, they’re writing injunctions on stuff he MIGHT do.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
11250 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:53 pm to
What's gonna happen is the individuals that were wronged will next file law suits against the DOJ who will agree with the plaintiffs or go to trial with full discovery of the democrates behavior. There was one filed last week for 18 million dollars.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8517 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 3:45 pm to

Is this judge effectively telling the DOJ and the IRS they cannot ever settle his lawsuit with Trump
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15041 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 3:53 pm to
Why is it the congressional slush fund for any sexual harassment claims against elected officials never brought up in conjunction with the blocking of this weaponization fund?
How can these judges and lawmakers say with a straight face that Trump cannot utilize his fund while they all hold their hands out to use taxpayer dollars to squash any sexual harassment claims against themselves. Then, on top of that, it's all classified and you can't get to the information about who was paid off and who did the utilize the fund.....It's complete and utter hypocrisy and bullshite.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42999 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

What's gonna happen is the individuals that were wronged will next file law suits against the DOJ who will agree with the plaintiffs or go to trial with full discovery of the democrates behavior. There was one filed last week for 18 million dollars.


Some republicans participated in that behavior.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42999 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

.It's complete and utter hypocrisy and bullshite.


Yup!
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
144298 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

It's going one step beyond just trolling and sets a terrible precedent.


that's one to look at it, I suppose.

but you could also say the suspension of rights, false imprisonment, and political prosecutions of such a large group of citizens set a bad precedent too.

Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
38626 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

but you could also say the suspension of rights, false imprisonment, and political prosecutions of such a large group of citizens set a bad precedent too.



Totally it does for the J6 folks. None of them deserved the treatment they got but a President should not get in the business of creating slush funds like these. If they feel they were wronged, there are certainly avenues they can take for justice. And I'm certain this administration would be more than happy to help them out.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116048 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

They had no problem with Biden’s DOJ paying big money to people like Lisa Page, McCabe and Strozyk.


Exactly. frick these judges.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
8240 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 9:54 pm to
So what happens to his lawsuit??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram