- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge rules no attorney-client privilege for Nathan Wade’s former lawyer
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
Does getting her booty call in on the money impugn the whole case to begin with, as she can only do this if there are charges?
And a grand jury will indict a fricking ham sandwich if the DA tries hard enough.
And a grand jury will indict a fricking ham sandwich if the DA tries hard enough.
0
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:55 pm to TDTOM
quote:
I hope they both end up working at popeyes.
20 minutes on the spicy
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:56 pm to teke184
quote:
20 minutes on the spicy
Enough time for a quickie.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:57 pm to mtntiger
quote:
How can he not have attorney-client privilege?
The question isn't whether "some" material may fall under privilege, they were wanting 6 years of this guys friendship covered under privilege too. They wanted to blanket the whole thing.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:57 pm to teke184
Under any scope, all this is sketch af. Her Bs reasons for funneling money to a lover, the bs charges, need for private security, lying boldly about him being with her, saying she didn't know the County disclosure laws (as the damn DA),
They tried to take any and everything and roll privilege into it. That doesn’t work when you are friends and convey information that didn’t relate to a relative legal matter.
Black privilege is the only reason this unprofessional, crooked “lawyer” has a job .
Did you hear her talk about the easy money she made being a judge?
They tried to take any and everything and roll privilege into it. That doesn’t work when you are friends and convey information that didn’t relate to a relative legal matter.
Black privilege is the only reason this unprofessional, crooked “lawyer” has a job .
Did you hear her talk about the easy money she made being a judge?
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:01 pm to RealDawg
It is sketchy but it is a thing in that community, much like Ben Crump saying it is a culture thing for blacks to commit crimes.
Whenever someone gets control over an organization, the temptation is to use that organization’s resources to enrich “their tribe”, either for existing connections or for people they want indebted to them.
Whenever someone gets control over an organization, the temptation is to use that organization’s resources to enrich “their tribe”, either for existing connections or for people they want indebted to them.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:17 pm to Riverside
quote:
Negative ghost rider. Not atty-privilege, no atty-client confidentiality.
Incorrect.
Privilege is an evidentiary exception created by statute that can (as was in this case) be determined not to apply. That does not mean the communication is not still subject to the confidentiality requirements of Rule 1.6.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:18 pm to TDTOM
quote:
I hope they both end up working at popeyes.
They will both end up with some cush gig at CNN or MSNBC.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:21 pm to teke184
quote:
never someone gets control over an organization, the temptation is to use that organization’s resources to enrich “their tribe”, either for existing connections or for people they want indebted to them.
So reparations? What’s the problem here? Now they can fire that idiot that’s looking into how to distribute the reparations, fat fani already completed that task. Win win.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:23 pm to udtiger
I thought during the hearing they all basically said the confidentiality part didn't apply
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I thought during the hearing they all basically said the confidentiality part didn't apply
I can't speak to that. I didn't listen to the hearing. But that is odd.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:32 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:37 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Enough time for a quickie.
Twice!
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:48 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
No going to lie.... this has been as satisfying a story to me as watching the FBI investigate Hillary or watching Trump win.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:51 pm to mtntiger
quote:
How can he not have attorney-client privilege?
What am I missing?
BTW - not taking the Willis-Wade side, just seems like an odd ruling to me.
I've been watching a good bit of The Lead Attorney on YouTube covering this case (he's an Atlanta lawyer)
He described it as well as possible...
Basically... there's a difference between pro talk & bro talk
I guess the judge determined there was a lot more bro talk than pro talk exchanged between the 2
This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:58 pm to mtntiger
quote:
How can he not have attorney-client privilege?
Watching the hearing I was wondering if the dude was ever even actually his attorney at all. There was no engagement letter, no invoices for his services, and I don't believe the dude ever even had a file for Wade. I got the impression Wade was representing himself and having his partner rubber stamp the documents.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 8:18 pm to KCSilverTiger
quote:
Watching the hearing I was wondering if the dude was ever even actually his attorney at all. There was no engagement letter, no invoices for his services, and I don't believe the dude ever even had a file for Wade
SFP would say that they just don’t know any better.
The next atty I meet that doesn’t make me sign an engagement letter or doesn’t know how to bill me very effectively will be the first.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 8:19 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Fani's other special prosecutor, Ms Cross, has already established that Wade's former lawyer was a liar. I didn't understand her strategy at the time, but now it makes sense. They'll move to impeach the witness so the witness won't have a chance to testify to further undermine Fani and Wade. Hopefully the judge doesn't fall for the trap
Viva Frei (who I love) has a theory that this was a HUGE F’Up by this Cross Lady.
She threw him under the bus and embarrassed him about a settlement. Now he’s pissed. It won’t go well for Fani and Wade. He’ll spill all their dirty laundry and won’t have any desire to protect either of these morons
Posted on 2/26/24 at 8:21 pm to Wednesday
Going for a kill shot on a guy who just covered for you is a bold move, Cotton.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 8:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't think any of them understood proper billing, accounting, etc. procedures.
If only there were a common factor….
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News