Started By
Message

re: Judge orders brain-dead pregnant woman removed from ventilator

Posted on 1/25/14 at 7:59 am to
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170584 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Also the husband has no say in the termination of pregnancy. If she is dead, then she is dead

Well why wouldn't he have a say? Wouldn't he essentially be speaking on behalf of his deceased wife?

Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 8:04 am to
Ever notice how the people who throw their religion in your face seem to fear the afterlife the most? Here, if you truly believed in God, Heaven and that the fetus is a human being with a soul, you would know he/she is better off with a straight ticket there than having to endure the suffering he/she will invariably encounter on Earth.

I really count understand how people can oppose this or doctor assisted suicide. I put my dog down two years ago because her internal organs were consumed by cancer. She was clearly in pain and had no quality of life left. The idea that I "murdered" her the way these nuts are accusing the father of "murdering" these fetus is absurd. If we put animals down out of love I see no difference in putting down humans. Usually by doctor assisted suicide but also in the cases of brain dead people or deformed fetuses in brain dead people.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28158 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 11:24 am to
If this is a new law then it is just a case of the hospital trying to protect themselves. Sucks but major hospitals can't just choose not to follow the law. Problem is Texas doesn't have a dictator that can exempt them from the law.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 11:51 am to
quote:

This whole thing is ridiculous. Viability or lack of was established by early gestational age and later ultrasounds that show what sounds like profound deformities and abnormalities. These will not improve while this fetus continues to gestate inside a dead womans body.

This is NOT an abortion issue. Thump your bibles elsewhere. Were the woman 30+ weeks pregnant when she had this PE or whatever happened and the husband said "frick em' I can't handle it. pull the plug." Thats one thing. But 14 weeks and he is hell bent on murdering his baby??


Correct.

This case highlighted a problem with the Texas law that sparked this incident. The law is too vague and acted as a ctach all for any dead comatose pregnant woman regardless of the circumstances surrounding it. If the law is going to remain in Texas, it needs to be tweaked with viability stipulations and clarifications/exemptions to be added to the law for scenarios just like this one.
Posted by sugar71
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
9967 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

This case highlighted a problem with the Texas law that sparked this incident. The law is too vague and acted as a ctach all for any dead comatose pregnant woman regardless of the circumstances surrounding it. If the law is going to remain in Texas, it needs to be tweaked with viability stipulations and clarifications/exemptions to be added to the law for scenarios just like this one.


Wrong
. This case highlights a problem with so called 'small government ' right wing legislators /politicians who claim they want government out of our lives(Unless it's a woman's uterus , our bedrooms,personal lives ,etc......) In any other state this macabre spectacle would have ended weeks ago when the woman was declared 'dead' by the coroner. Even in Texas before this foolish & unnecessary law was passed by those small government legislators, the machines would have been turned off.

There is no such damn thing as 'dead comatose' woman. She is dead. There is no such thing as a 'brain dead' woman(Just as there is no such thing as 'heart dead'). She is dead .

They are artificially mimicking life by pumping oxygen into a slowly decaying corpse via 'mechanical parts'(lungs/heart).


It's the right wing obssession with fetuses/abortion which created this. The law states that air should be artificially pumped through the pregnant corpse (even against her & her family wishes) until the fetus is viable(which is around 30 weeks?)

The only law should be the machine should be turned off when . The coroner declares the person dead. If the fetus can survive outside the womb so be it , but to incubate it inside a corpse is sick.Mary Shelley if she were alive couldn't have imagined something so grotesque.





Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

The only law should be the machine should be turned off when . The coroner declares the person dead. If the fetus can survive outside the womb so be it , but to incubate it inside a corpse is sick.Mary Shelley if she were alive couldn't have imagined something so grotesque.





Notice how all the anti-abortion types have vanished.

They know they are inhumane, but can't bring themselves to admit it.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
85231 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Notice how all the anti-abortion types have vanished.


Checking in.
Now what are we discussing now?
Let me read the thread and then I'll be back to tell you why you suck.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Let me read the thread and then I'll be back to tell you why you suck.



Posted by willthezombie
the graveyard
Member since Dec 2013
1546 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Brain dead woman, non viable fetus. I don't see the problem. Husband agreed with the decision as well.


Yeah I agree withe Poewerman . The husband, hospital and family all agreed that it was time to pull the plug. I'm glad the judge didn't force hospital to keep her on ventilator for a baby that would have been stillborn anyway.

Sad story all around
Posted by The Veldt
Member since May 2013
822 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

asurob1
Some people were about to compare this to Terry Schiavo case. Not comparable.
Let the woman die in peace.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
85231 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 2:52 pm to
Ok-- having now read the thread you don't suck. I wouldn't let you babysit my kids but you don't suck.

This one confuses me, honestly. It's a sickening situation.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

There is no such thing as a 'brain dead' woman


I'm afraid the law disagrees with you there sugar.

quote:

It's the right wing obssession with fetuses/abortion which created this.


Agreed. This case here is really a no brainer and really no different than a miscarriage. Pro-life crowd has no business fighting this issue. It's not an abortion or pro-life issue.

A fetus is not viable at 14 weeks. Nothing can be done for that. It's impossible.

quote:

The law states that air should be artificially pumped through the pregnant corpse (even against her & her family wishes) until the fetus is viable(which is around 30 weeks?)


This is where the law screws up. If that law is here to stay, it needs to depend on the viability of the fetus as determined by licensed medical doctors and professionals, not some misplaced sense of diginity of wanting to save a life and ignoring the reality of the situation. It needs an overhaul.

The way I see it, there are two unreasonable sides in this issue. One side wants to bring a fetus up to viability all the way from 14 weeks and be perfectly fine with or ignorant of the baby being completely deformed and living a very short and painful life. That's sick, creepy and inhumane. The other side has no problem with letting a clearly viable fetus die because the mother is brain dead and really gone. That's basically aborting a fetus and IMO only the mother has the right to abort the fetus. Nobody else should hold that right for her even when she's brain dead, not the state or next of kin. If there's nothing on the DNR stating otherwise, the fetus needs to be protected since it would be clearly viable.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
44878 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 4:00 pm to
Hmmmm... I posted on the last page.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20996 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 4:15 pm to
If the baby may have been able to survive outside the womb, I have no problem with leaving her on life support long enough for a C-section. However, this clearly wasn't close.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram