Started By
Message
locked post

Judge Merrick Garland got Screwed over 4 years ago. Seriously

Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:37 pm
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7495 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:37 pm
By Obama. They threw a guy out there that had no chance of being elected and he was made a pawn by the Democrats.



Betcha thought I was going to say something else...

Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50304 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:38 pm to
It's true. He never had a chance of being confirmed.
Posted by Bonkers119
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
10127 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:40 pm to
Wrong, he was railroaded by the Republicans. Its funny how narratives change based on who's in the office. The republican party is just full of hypocrites.
Posted by mattloc
Alabama
Member since Sep 2012
4304 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:40 pm to
Supreme Court justices are nominated by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate... Unfortunately for Merrick, Obama failed to seek the advice of the Senate
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19281 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:41 pm to
It was a political gamble to make the Republicans pay for opposing a "moderate" judge. It was also to allay fears of Clinton appointing another Ginsburg. He lost.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58549 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

Wrong, he was railroaded by the Republicans. Its funny how narratives change based on who's in the office. The republican party is just full of hypocrites.



Obama was a lame duck. Different situation. And yes, Obama hung him out to dry.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64475 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:42 pm to
I do feel bad for him. Obama knew what was going to happen with the Democrats not having control of the Senate and put him up anyway for political posturing for Hillary's campaign. Pretty unfair to put him through that for almost a year
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58549 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

It was a political gamble to make the Republicans pay for opposing a "moderate" judge. It was also to allay fears of Clinton appointing another Ginsburg. He lost.


Yep.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79615 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:42 pm to
He never had the votes to be confirmed. It’s just a dead horse the Dems like to beat.
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
53807 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

Wrong, he was railroaded by the Republicans. Its funny how narratives change based on who's in the office. The republican party is just full of hypocrites.


Do you think if the senate was democratic controlled today that they would approve ACB?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79615 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

Wrong, he was railroaded by the Republicans.


Wrong, he wouldn’t have had the votes to be confirmed.
Posted by OverseasBengal
Member since Dec 2018
1107 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

Wrong, he was railroaded by the Republicans. Its funny how narratives change based on who's in the office. The republican party is just full of hypocrites.







Bonkers is a very apt screen name for you
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64475 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Wrong, he was railroaded by the Republicans. Its funny how narratives change based on who's in the office. The republican party is just full of hypocrites.

Sure, he was railroaded, which is exactly what Democrats have tried to do with now 3 Trump appointees. The big difference is the Republicans have the power to get their people in regardless. The Democrats didn't. Yes, it's one big political game, but it's one that the Democrats can't win. They know it, so they, instead, scream hypocrites when they would do the same exact thing were the roles reversed. They just don't like the rules when they don't provide them their desired results, and rules mind you that they implemented.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 5:09 pm
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101293 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Wrong, he was railroaded by the Republicans. Its funny how narratives change based on who's in the office. The republican party is just full of hypocrites.



Democrats throw massive fits over the smallest things they perceive to be a loss, yet they just sort of let this go by with barely a whimper. That seems weird if any of them thought it was such an awful "railroading."

In other words, Obama and the rest of the democrats knew exactly what was going on (it would have never been Garland if they didn't), and were all but okay with it, knowing Hillary would appoint who they really wanted in a few months.
Posted by ClampClampington
Nebraska
Member since Jun 2017
3963 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Wrong, he was railroaded by the Republicans. Its funny how narratives change based on who's in the office. The republican party is just full of hypocrites.


Railroaded how, exactly? Surely you know the difference between a nomination and a confirmation. A President doesn't just get to appoint a judge to the SCOTUS. Republicans could have done the whole dog and pony show with the hearings, and guess what..
Garland would have still be denied a seat on the bench.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64475 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

In other words, Obama and the rest of the democrats knew exactly what was going on (it would have never been Garland if they didn't), and were all but okay with it, knowing Hillary would appoint who they really wanted in a few months.

bingo, which is why I do actually feel bad for Judge Garland. He was nothing more than a tool for them.
Posted by Broadside Bob
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2012
1075 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:46 pm to
I've been wondering if he realized he was a pawn. I didn't like Obama's politics, but nominating Garland was very smart and a good hedge...either the republicans confirmed him, trading a solid conservative seat for someone center-left, or faced the potential for someone much further to the left with Hillary's inevitable election. If the republicans do not confirm, they catch heat. Win either way for Obama's team.

BTW, Happy Birthday Hillary Rodham Clinton!!
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71339 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Wrong, he was railroaded by the Republicans. Its funny how narratives change based on who's in the office. The republican party is just full of hypocrites.


By that argument, the Dems are hypocrites too.
Posted by IM4LSUTIGERS
Member since Dec 2006
974 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:47 pm to
Bonkers119

Hmmm; Sound a little butt hurt
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
51814 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:48 pm to
Thanks Harry!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram