- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge issues arrest warrant for @lascanner
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:41 pm to beachdude
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:41 pm to beachdude
quote:
18 USC 371. Conspiracy to obstruct justice. You may wish to read it.
I have.
As I said, if they're going this route, it's going to be very difficult if all he did was post objective location data and no inciting/instructing language otherwise.
This is like saying that posting locations of DWI checkpoints or cops running radar is obstruction of justice. Quite a few jurisdictions have had to pay large settlements for similar mistakes.
4
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:41 pm to DemonKA3268
quote:
Damn “counselor” no response to this?
She's prep'n her fricked up reBUTTal
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:42 pm to UncleFestersLegs
That case
My comment
Do you need me to explain the difference in confidential and public?
quote:
A former Washington, DC, police lieutenant was sentenced Friday to 18 months in prison for leaking confidential information to Enrique Tarrio about his force’s investigation into the Proud Boys leader’s burning of a Black Lives Matter flag and for misleading federal agents.
My comment
quote:
Did he post actual threats or just names and objective, public information?
Do you need me to explain the difference in confidential and public?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is probably not going to survive scrutiny if that's all they did.
You believed Trump raped someone because of an accusation with no evidence 25 years later
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:49 pm to texag7
quote:
You believed Trump raped someone because of an accusation with no evidence 25 years later
That's not an accurate re-telling of the story.
I don't believe her. He still lost the trial, and my comments only reflected that.
Now, I did use the wrong legal terminology, which I corrected. He was found liable, not convicted. Again, that doesn't mean *I* believe her. What you said objectively worse than my slight error.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Did you miss where he’s a felon on probation using a police scanner and in possession of guns?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I don't know that those are the basis for for his re-arrest.
Do you need me to explain the difference in confidential and public?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
frick u clown
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
He's on probation & using a scanner to disrupt police efforts, which is a crime. There is an actual penal code for it. So no, not like telling someone about a roadblock.
Also the FCC prohibits the unauthorized decoding of encrypted or scrambled police communications. He did that too.
47 U.S.C. § 605(a)
Penal Code Section 636.5
Also
Also the FCC prohibits the unauthorized decoding of encrypted or scrambled police communications. He did that too.
47 U.S.C. § 605(a)
Penal Code Section 636.5
Also
quote:
Those on probation or parole caught using a scanner unlawfully could face additional penalties or stricter supervision terms.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:54 pm to This GUN for HIRE
That’s a bingo
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
Biggest cocksucker on this board.
Make 4 chinnies look virginal.
Make 4 chinnies look virginal.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:55 pm to This GUN for HIRE
If that's what he was arrested for then that's much more likely to succeed clearly, but not what I was talking about.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
Of course cockgobbler it wasn't what you talked about.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:56 pm to This GUN for HIRE
quote:
He's on probation & using a scanner to disrupt police efforts, which is a crime. There is an actual penal code for it. So no, not like telling someone about a roadblock. Also the FCC prohibits the unauthorized decoding of encrypted or scrambled police communications. He did that too. 47 U.S.C. § 605(a) Penal Code Section 636.5 Also quote:Those on probation or parole caught using a scanner unlawfully could face additional penalties or stricter supervision terms.
SFP…
As an “educated” man, you knew about this.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:57 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Why in the world is Dan Bongino going after this guy? He needs to be looking for the magical Epstein guestbook that all of the pedophiles signed
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 6:58 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:59 pm to NC_Tigah
That fat frick looks like a young SFP
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
From what I can tell, 636.5 looks to be a misdemeanor. Are you familiar with criminal law much?
would that be enough to revoke his probation and send him back to jail on his felony charges if convicted?
would that be enough to revoke his probation and send him back to jail on his felony charges if convicted?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:59 pm to Proximo
What is his prior conviction for? Dude looks like he's 17yrs old.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:00 pm to Lsut81
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Stalking (of a vulnerable person apparently), it was a felony
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:He’s a felon Slow, he’s on probation and he is/was in possession of a police scanner and chose to provide “peaceful protesters” with names and locations of federal agents so that those protesters/rioters could converge on federal agents. He then said he’d shoot anyone who came for him, so he had/has a firearm in his possession. Again, he’s a felon on probation.
As I said, if they're going this route, it's going to be very difficult if all he did was post objective location data and no inciting/instructing language otherwise.
This is like saying that posting locations of DWI checkpoints or cops running radar is obstruction of justice. Quite a few jurisdictions have had to pay large settlements for similar mistakes.
Page 3 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News