re: Judge Boasberg now wants Cabinet Level Privileged Information- 3/20/25

quote:

---

and you think that won’t happen?

---

So far the judge has ordered them to do one or the other multiple times and they haven’t.

Maybe eventually they will, but so far they aren’t obeying the law.

quote:

---

Oh my. Is you LSU JD your final degree? How embarrassing.

---

Did you go to Harvard to learn to make 7 posts about a law you don’t understand?

quote:

---

Judge Boasberg now wants Cabinet Level Privileged Information- 3/20/25

---

Of course, this hinges on whether deporting some gang members is a national security concern as in statecraft.

Rather specious argument in my opinion but the Trump II administration is pushing the limits of what they think they can get away with to find their limits amongst the checks and balances system.

quote:

---

Blindly following authority isn’t “law and order”.

---

Who are you saying is blindly following authority?

quote:

---

tate Secret Provilege requires them to produce enough information for the judge to evaluate whether it’s a legitimate state secret.

---

Doesnt need “state secret” privelege when executive privilege exists.

Further if the President cannot access SS documentation within his own branch… there’s zero reason to think another branch can have access to another branch’s documents. Zero. Zip. Nada. Zilch. None.

quote:

---

Doesnt need “state secret” privelege when executive privilege exists.

Further if the President cannot access SS documentation within his own branch… there’s zero reason to think another branch can have access to another branch’s documents. Zero. Zip. Nada. Zilch. None.

---

There is a lot of reasons to think otherwise...the rest of US jurisprudence and case law.

quote:

---

Doesnt need “state secret” privelege when executive privilege exists.

---

It exists but it doesn’t apply here.

But if you disagree maybe write a letter to the DOJ and let them know they should claim it instead of suggesting they may claim
state secret privilege.

quote:

---

Who are you saying is blindly following authority?

---

Im sorry if you can’t figure out it is. It’s obvious to everyone around here I’d guess. Maybe someone else will fill you in. You need more help than I’m willing to provide.

For now… Jus follow zee orrders und get und zee rail car.

quote:

---

For now… Jus follow zee orrders und get und zee rail car.

---

who is putting people on a plane to a human rights violation factory in el salvador and arguing that he shouldn’t have any judicial oversight while he does it?

Is that my guys?

Or are yall loading the box cars?

This whole thread is y’all arguing “Trump is right and I don't even want him to have to prove to anyone he’s right”

If that’s not blindly following someone idk what is.

quote:

---

So far the judge has ordered them to do one or the other multiple times and they haven’t.

---

WHO GIVES A frick WHAT THIS JUDGE ORDERS. This judge is on the lowest rung of the judiciary.

There are 600 of these fricking judges in the US. More than congress and it takes a vote of Congress. And they are only in charge of their little district not the entire US

One, essentially federal traffic court judge, DOES NOT have the authority to demand the Executive not perform their Constitutional duty

quote:

---

A Simple grammar error which is a standard Owl feature with his speech to text program

---

I will readily admit that I almost always use speech on my phone rather than type. On the computer I type but if I'm on my phone it's all talking