re: Judge Beryl Howell goes all in blocks another Trump EO - Perkins Coie

Asking the "legal eagles" about this. There has to be something, somewhere that it is written on just how widespread the jurisdiction is for these judges. I am not sure, as an example, why some random judge in San Fransisco would have any say on what I can or can not do in Mississippi. If's there is something written that limits these injunction and restraining orders, why doesn't the SCOTUS curb stomp some of these asshat rulings?

quote:

---

Now he's moving into the attack phase because he can not and will not address the concern.

---

What concern?

I called the impending reliance on vague conspiracies and the very next post was such a post.

It has nothing to do with pivoting, which was your response.

quote:

---

So we've shifted from Perkins Coie to the DOJ in 2016-2017 to some vague allegations in 2020?

---

My allegation is quite specific.

Edit: Also, i just jumped into this conversation like 10 minutes ago, so i haven't shifted at all.

quote:

---

there's more than enough evidence to reach the conclusion that they were trying to get him out of office.

---

The DOJ? Or Perkins Coie?

What actions related to Russia-gate do you have by Perkins Coie post-election ( you said "out of office" which implies post-election) to defend this?

Perkins Coie is a super powerful D.C. firm.

It was expected that they would get some hits in.

They know who is who and how to land the right judges.

quote:

---

Then remove them for the DOJ, because that's the only actors being discussed in that post.

---

Lying again......


Section 1. Purpose. The dishonest and dangerous activity of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP (“Perkins Coie”) has affected this country for decades. Notably, in 2016 while representing failed Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Perkins Coie hired Fusion GPS, which then manufactured a false “dossier” designed to steal an election. This egregious activity is part of a pattern. Perkins Coie has worked with activist donors including George Soros to judicially overturn popular, necessary, and democratically enacted election laws, including those requiring voter identification. In one such case, a court was forced to sanction Perkins Coie attorneys for an unethical lack of candor before the court.

quote:

---

What actions related to Russia-gate do you have by Perkins Coie post-election ( you said "out of office" which implies post-election) to defend this?

---

You may want to back up and see what you and I are discussing. It's the goal of Russia-gate.

quote:

---

You are lying again.

---

No I'm not. You just don't understand what's being discussed.

What you bolded has nothing to do with the actual allegations of illegality being posted in this thread (which are exclusively acts of the DOJ).

What you bolded is something else. I described it earlier ITT:

quote:

---

Based on that argument, any political campaigning for the losing side is now "attempting to overthrow an elected government", which is patently absurd.

---

Punishing someone for representing your political opponent (or someone associated with that opponent) in a race is viewpoint discrimination pretty clearly.

quote:

---

No I'm not. You just don't understand what's being discussed.

---

Oh I do. It's just you not wanting this:

Section 1. Purpose. The dishonest and dangerous activity of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP (“Perkins Coie”) has affected this country for decades. Notably, in 2016 while representing failed Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Perkins Coie hired Fusion GPS, which then manufactured a false “dossier” designed to steal an election. This egregious activity is part of a pattern. Perkins Coie has worked with activist donors including George Soros to judicially overturn popular, necessary, and democratically enacted election laws, including those requiring voter identification. In one such case, a court was forced to sanction Perkins Coie attorneys for an unethical lack of candor before the court.


To be part of the topic anymore because it kills all of your stupid takes on this.

The fricking judge doesn’t get security clearance why should thes law firms