- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Beryl Howell goes all in blocks another Trump EO - Perkins Coie
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:30 am to RohanGonzales
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:30 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
another post to extend the thread, just like court, right?
I'm pretty well known for my efficiency in court, actually.
0
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:31 am to Jbird
quote:
Irrelevant to my point.
I tried to help you and make your point relevant
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:31 am to LSU2ALA
Shut the frick up the admin can choose what contractor to do business with and they can pull any security level they want. I hate progressives…
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:32 am to BCreed1
quote:
Perkins Coke is a domestic security risk for the United States
Has not been proven above echo chamber ramblings.
quote:
because its actions were a coordinated attack to overthrow the elected government
Calling this histrionics is being too kind.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:My point was spot on, viewpoint discrimination would have denied my Top Secret/SCI clearance period.
I tried to help you and make your point relevant
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:34 am to LSU2ALA
quote:
No, I understand how the first amendment works
you are so laughably wrong. quote:
This is the federal government imposing a penalty on another party based on the viewpoint they held. That is unconstitutional any day. This is not even close.
Nope. He simply removed security clearances of those involved with the Russia hoax. You don’t even know the facts of the case, much less how the 1st Amendment works.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:34 am to Strannix
Bottom line:
If TRUMP is involved, they gonna try and shut it down!
DEMS are digging a massive hole....
If TRUMP is involved, they gonna try and shut it down!
DEMS are digging a massive hole....
This post was edited on 5/3/25 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
any political campaigning for the losing side is now "attempting to overthrow an elected government"
lol
You carried your fun a little too far on that one.
You’re not this stupid.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:36 am to LSU2ALA
No you don’t
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:37 am to Hognutz
Maybe Trump needs to start shitting on these judges. That will at least get Roberts to respond.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:37 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
You carried your fun a little too far on that one.
You’re not this stupid.
No. I'm just not extrapolating for histrionic effect.
At best, your argument starts with the DOJ, but you still have a long way to show anything close to "overthrowing" (post-election actions to remove Trump are basically non-existent).
You can't even pivot to impeachment, as those had nothing do with Russia-Gate.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:40 am to SlowFlowPro
In your best legal opinion, who is intimately responsible for assigning or revoking security clearances? Is it congress? Is it these "impartial judges' ? Is it the president?
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:42 am to SlowFlowPro
What would you characterize the use of false information, knowingly and repeatedly, to mislead the FISA court for the purpose of surveilling the Administration and beginning the removal of a duly elected President?
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:42 am to Branson
quote:
In your best legal opinion, who is intimately responsible for assigning or revoking security clearances? Is it congress? Is it these "impartial judges' ? Is it the president?
It's the President, but the President is confined to behaving in line with the Constitution. The President must always act within his limited statutory and Constitutional authority, otherwise the action is illegal.
We just discussed this with the Aliens Enemies Act case yesterday/last night. Even in areas where the President has exclusive authority doesn't mean he has unlimited authority. He's always restrained by the Constitution (and/or statute, if the authority was given to him by Congressional act).
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
post-election actions to remove Trump are basically non-existent
- SFP
May 3, 2025
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:43 am to LuckyTiger
I may have to use that as my new sig quote.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:44 am to VOR
quote:
So , some of you are fine with a president targeting private law firms
that he doesn’t like? Would you feel the same if a Democrat did the same thing?
They aided a foreign, Russian-led scheme against a presidential candidate in favor of another. This derailed the will of the American people during Trump's first term. This is not "viewpoint discrimination."
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
patently absurd............But actively practiced in Germany, France, Romania , Ireland, England, Brazil , Pakistan, South Africa, Canada, Saudi Arabia, etc etc etc etc
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:45 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
What would you characterize the use of false information, knowingly and repeatedly, to mislead the FISA court
An action of the DOJ, not Perkins Coie.
Logically, Trump should strip the DOJ of its security clearances with this argument.
quote:
and beginning the removal of a duly elected President?
What specific actions were taken pursuant to Russia-Gate to remove Trump?
Impeachment? No.
Ultimately he was vindicated and it was one of his larger political victories in his first term. It ended up being great for him.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. I'm just not extrapolating for histrionic effect.
At best, your argument starts with the DOJ, but you still have a long way to show anything close to "overthrowing" (post-election actions to remove Trump are basically non-existent).
You can't even pivot to impeachment, as those had nothing do with Russia-Gate.
I swear. This might be the dumbest poster on this website. Why do yall keep engaging with such obvious nonsense?
Page 4 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News